Skip to main content

Getting to Know Your Tools as Science Teachers and Students

A Reflective Exercise on Laboratory Apparatus, Equipment and Instruments

  • Chapter
Science Education in International Contexts
  • 668 Accesses

Abstract

Coyne (1997) wrote in his book, The Laboratory Companion – A Practical Guide to Materials, Equipment, and Technique, that “the most dangerous person in the laboratory, to both equipment and other personnel, is the person who through pride, ego, or ignorance, claims knowledge that he or she does not have (pp. xviii)”. Most people working in a school laboratory setting are learners (teachers, technical staff and students) and are therefore unlikely to claim “knowledge that he or she does not have”. It is not a crime if we do not know some facts or information. However, if we do not make an effort to know what we should know in our studies, or to do our work properly, then that would not be a good learning or work attitude. This is especially so in the science laboratory. Such an attitude would put everyone working in the laboratory on the path of danger. Hence, as science teachers and students, we should make an effort to know our “tools of the trade” – the laboratory apparatus, equipment and instruments. We should try to know more about the hardware we are working with for the safety of all, including ours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, S., & Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 1188–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, S. G. (1997). The laboratory companion – a practical guide to materials, equipment, and technique. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Massachusetts, MA: Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. K. (2001). Teaching, learning, and assessment together. The reflective classroom. New York: Eye on Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, R. (1994). Teach for metacognitive reflection. Illinois, IL: Skylight Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. J., & Elliott, C. (2004). “Prompted” inquiry-based learning in the introductory chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(2), 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A., & Fry, R. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of group processes (pp. 33–58), London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Theory and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Physics Discovery and Intuition. (2003, April-June). Connections through time. Issue 19. Retrieved November 7, 2009, from http://www.p-i-a.com/Magazine/Issue19/Physics_19.htm

  • Selby, C. C. (2006). What makes it science? A modern look at scientific inquiry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 35(7), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. S. (2002). Reflective learning in the classroom. Review of Educational Research and Advances for Classroom Teachers, 21(2), 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. S. (2004). Keeping reflective journals. In S. K. Chang, J. A. Shek, & B. T. Ho (Eds.), Managing project work in schools: Issues and innovative practices (pp. 41–57). Singapore: Pearson Education Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. S. (2007). Using “What if..” questions to teach science. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1), Article 16. Retrieved November 7, 2009, from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/

  • Tan, K. S., & Goh, N. K. (2002, November). Reflective learning and the school science curriculum. Paper presented at the ERAS 2002 conference, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, P. (1995). Managing to learn. Aspects of reflective and experiential learning in schools. London: Casell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Jan, L. W. (1993). Thinking for themselves: Developing strategies for reflective learning. Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, Ks. (2011). Getting to Know Your Tools as Science Teachers and Students. In: Cheng, M.M.H., So, W.W.M. (eds) Science Education in International Contexts. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-427-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships