Abstract
Promoting students’ understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS) has become a core element in science education. The understanding of NOS is emphasized both in the junior and the new senior science curricula in Hong Kong. This chapter reports the outcomes of a project which was a collaboration between the Hong Kong Institute of Education and a local secondary school. This chapter provides a summary of experience gained from a series of learning and teaching activities designed with an intention to raise junior secondary students’ understanding of NOS. The teaching strategies adopted followed an explicit approach to the teaching of NOS, and included the use of science stories, newspaper articles, an activity using a black box, and an activity inviting students to analyse some experimental data. These strategies were designed to stimulate students to consider the processes involved in a scientific investigation, the relationship between science and society, and the objective and subjective elements of data analysis. The chapter describes the considerations for designing, performing, and assessing science experiments, and the problems that teachers or students encountered in the process. Findings reflect what students have learnt, how their views of NOS may have changed, and whether the teaching activities can achieve the aims. The chapter concludes with teachers’ and students’ feedback, and recommendations for future development of teaching approaches that enhance students’ understanding of NOS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
Akerson, V., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmark for science literacy:A project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, R. L., Blair, L., Crawford, B., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on students’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509.
Bell, R. L., & Matkins, J. J. (2003, March). Learning about the nature of science in an elementary science methods course: Content vs context. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z. R., Letts, W. J., & Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 340–362.
Chalmers, A. (1982). What is this thing called science? New York: University of Queensland Press.
Clough, M. P. (2003). Explicit but insufficient: Additional considerations for successful NOS instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the association for the education of teachers, St. Louis, MO.
Curriculum Development Council. (2002). Science education: Key learning area curriculum guide (Primary 1 - Secondary 3). Hong Kong: The Education Department, The Hong Kong SAR Government.
Curriculum Development Council & the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2006). Science education key learning area: New senior secondary curriculum and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6), biology (Provisional final draft of curriculum part). Retrieved from http://www.emb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeid=2824&langno=1
Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leach, J., Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school classrooms. Science Education, 87, 831–848.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions about the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. J., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.
McComas, W. F. (2004). Keys to teaching the nature of Science. The Science Teacher, 71(9), 24–27.
National Science Teachers Association. (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Retrieved December 6, 2006, from http://www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
Ratcliffe, M., & Grace. M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. USA: Open University Press.
Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76, 559–580.
Sadler, T. D., Chambers, W. F., & Zeidler, D. (2002, April). Investigating the crossroads of socioscentific issues, the nature of science, and critical thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of National Association for Research in Science Teaching. New Orleans, LA.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Teacher Education, 88(4), 610–645.
Smith, C., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M. G. (2000). Sixth-grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349–422.
Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. UK: Open University Press.
Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1997). Beliefs about the nature of science and the enacted science curriculum. Science and Education, 6, 355–371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cheng, M.M.H. (2011). Towards the Development of an Instructional Model That Enhances Junior Secondary Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science. In: Cheng, M.M.H., So, W.W.M. (eds) Science Education in International Contexts. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-427-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-427-0_5
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-427-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)