Skip to main content

The Role of Elite Universities in National Higher Education and Research Systems, and the Challenges of Prosecuting the Case for Concentrating Public Investment in their Development in Australia

  • Chapter
Book cover Paths to a World-Class University

Part of the book series: Global Perspectives on Higher Education ((GPHE,volume 23))

Abstract

Around the world there is an interest on the part of governments in the capacity and performance of elite research universities within national higher education and innovation systems (Salmi, 2009). However, the level of interest and initiative varies, and for many countries, the motives are mixed and the measures vexed (Altbach and Balan, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altbach, P., & Balan, J. (2007). World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arai. K. (2007). An interview in “The Future Of Research Universities”. EMBO Reports, 8(9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Archbishop of Canterbury. (2006). China - What is a university? Speech given in Wuhan. Retrieved http:// www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/698

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada. (2008). Momentum: The 2008 report on university research and knowledge mobilization. Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2009). Strengthening the AQF: An architecture for Australia’s qualifications. Consultation Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Byrkjeflot H. (2002). Changing knowledge regimes - Universities in a new research environment. Higher Education, 44(2-3), 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2007). Systematic integration and macro steering. In Main transformations, challenges and emerging patterns in higher education systems, UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper No. 16. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, D. (1990). Universities and the future of America. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, G., & Lucas, C. (2008). What are universities for? Leuven: LERU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1996). Co-Opetition: A revolution mindset that combines competition and cooperation. The game theory strategy: That’s changing the game of business. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink, C. (2009, July 1-3). On quality and standards. Keynote Address at The Australian Universities Quality Forum. Alice Springs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, V. (1945). Science the endless frontier: A report to the President. Washington, DC: United States Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, T. (2008). Venturous Australia: Building strength in innovation. Report of the Review of Australia’s National Innovation System. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Weert, E. (2009). Graduates in the knowledge society: Employer and higher education perspectives. Presentation at ANECA Conference, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, J. A., King, C. J., & Feller, I. (2009). A room with a view: Globalization, universities, and the imperative of a broader U.S. perspective. Berkeley, CA: Center for Studies in Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. G. (2004). Econometric studies of higher education. Journal of Econometrics, 121, 19-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, J. (2009) U.S. higher education: Contemporary challenges, policy options, In Palfreyman, D. & Tapper, T. (Eds.). Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. (2009). Diversify, differentiate, innovate: Airport strategies for success in a new world. Exambela Consulting. Retrieved from http://www.exambela.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, R. L. (2009). The Ivy League. In D. Palfreyman, & T. Tapper (Eds.), Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons. M. (2004). Globalisation, innovation and socially robust knowledge. In King, R. (Ed.), The university in the global age. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guri-Rosenblit, S., Sebkova, H., & Teichler, U. (2007). Massification and diversity of higher education systems: Interplay of complex dimensions. In Main transformations, challenges and emerging patterns in higher education systems. Paris: UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper No. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn, E. (2008). Learning to live with league tables and ranking: The experience of institutional leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21, 193-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE. (1999). The role of selectivity and the characteristics of excellence. HEFCE Review of Research Policy and Funding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2002). Current science policies and their implications for the concept of Academic identity. In Proceedings of the international workshop science, training and career: Changing modes of knowledge production and labour markets. Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humboldt, W. Von. (1810). Über die innere und aeussere organisation der hoeheren wissenschaftlichen Anstalten in Berlin. In Leitzmann, et al. (Eds.), Wilhelm von Humboldts Gesammelte Schriften. Band X. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm. B. & Pasternack, P. (2009), The German “Excellence Initiative”. In Palfreyman, D. & Tapper, T. (Eds.), Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, R. (2007). Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 385-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third missions on universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities. In Diversification of higher education and the changing role of knowledge and research. UNESCO Forum Occasional Paper Series No. 6. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litan, R., & Mitchell, L. (2008). Should universities be agents of economic development? In C. J. Schramm, et al. (Eds.), The future of the research university: Meeting the global challenges of the 21st century. Missouri: Kauffman Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Where to from here? Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Association for International Education, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2007). Global university rankings: Implications in general and for Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 29(2), 131-142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B. R., & Tang, P. (2007). The benefits from publicly funded research. SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No. 161. University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L. (2000). Understanding diversity and differentiation in higher education: An overview. Higher Education Policy, 13, 1-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L., & Davies, D. (2009). Policy dynamics in higher education and research: concepts and observations. In V. L. Meek, U. Teichler, & M. Kearney (Eds.), Higher education, research and innovation. Kassel: International Center for Higher Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mian, S., & W. Hulsink (2009). Building knowledge ecosystems through science and technology parks: A comparative review of the emerging US and European regional models. Paper prepared for the XXVI IASP World Conference on Science and Technology Parks, June 1-4, RTP, North Carolina, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2009). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21, 5-27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. (2009). Four tiers. Higher Education, 58, 302-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in National innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & Nelson. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natelson, D. (2007). Long-Term research, companies and universities. Retrieved from http://nanoscale. blogspot.com/2007/03/long-term-research-companies-and.html

    Google Scholar 

  • National Board of Employment, Education and Training. (1993). The effects of resource concentration on research performance. Commissioned Report, No. 25. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Intelligence Council. (2008). Global trends 2025: A transformed world. Washington: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html. Newman, J. H. (1852). The idea of a university. Longmans, Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking science: Knowledge and the public age of uncertainty. London: Polity press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfreyman, D., & Tapper, T. (2009). What is an “Elite” or “Leading Global” university? In D. Palfreyman, & Tapper, T. (Eds.) Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. (1957). Report of the committee on Australian universities. Canberra. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (2001). Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from us theory and practice? Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharmaceuticals Asia Product News. (2009). Key trends in offshoring pharmaceutical R&D: Company strategies, emerging markets and impact on ROI. Aarkstore. Retrieved from http://aarkstore.com/ reports/KeyTrendsinOffshoring

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter. M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2007). Public support for science and innovation. Research Report. Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2008). The future of higher education teaching and the student experience. Report prepared for The Review of Higher Education in the United Kingdom. HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothblatt, S. (2009). Foreword to structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. In D. Palfreyman, & Tapper, T. (Eds.) Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott. P. (2005). Mass higher education - ten years on. Paper presented at the AUA Annual Conference, Coventry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P. (2009). Structural changes in higher education: The case of the united kingdom. In D. Palfreyman, & Tapper, T. (Eds.) Structuring mass higher education: The role of elite institutions. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, H. T. (2001). Professional education and the soul of the American research university. MichiganL: Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2006). Changing structures of higher education systems: The increasing complexity of underlying forces. Higher Education Policy, 19(4), 447-461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (2008). Entrepreneurial universities: The view from Israel. In C. J. Schramm, et al. (Eds.), The future of the research university: Meeting the global challenges of the 21st century. Missouri: Kauffman Foundation. Retrieved from http://ssm.com/abstracts=1352645

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1973) Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Berkeley, California: Carnegie Commission on Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow. M. (2003), On Mass Higher Education and Institutional Diversity. In University education and human resources. Tel Aviv: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, A. (2009, May 21-24). Ten years back and ten years forward: Developments and trends in higher education in the Europe region. Paper prepared for the UNESCO Forum on Higher Education in the Europe Region: Access, Values, Quality and Competitiveness. Bucharest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J. (2007). The future of research universities. Science and society interviews. EMBO Report, 8(9).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallagher, M. (2011). The Role of Elite Universities in National Higher Education and Research Systems, and the Challenges of Prosecuting the Case for Concentrating Public Investment in their Development in Australia. In: Liu, N.C., Wang, Q., Cheng, Y. (eds) Paths to a World-Class University. Global Perspectives on Higher Education, vol 23. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-355-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships