Abstract
Over the last twenty years, an increasing interest has been developed in what concerns the contribution of HOS to the teaching of science in all levels of education. This interest has been expressed with: a) the creation of the International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group b) the organization of European and International Conferences (Paris 1988; Tallahassee-Florida 1989; Cambridge 1990; Madrid 1992; Szombathely 1994; Minneapolis 1995; Bratislava 1996; Pavia 1999; Calgary 2007; Notre Dame 2009) and c) the publication of the Journal: Science & Education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057-1095.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americas. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arons, A. B. (1989). Historical and philosophical perspectives attainable in introductory physics courses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 20(2), 13-23.
Arons, A. B. (1990). A guide to introductory physics teaching. New York: John Wiley.
Atwater, M. M. (1996). Social constructivism: Infusion into the multicultural science education research agenda. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 821-837.
Avraamidou, L., & Osborn, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683-1707.
Azcarate, C., Donel, M. G., & Romo, J. (1988). Galileo Galilei, la nueva ciencia del motimiato. De Catalunya, Bellatorra: Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona y Universitat Politencina.
Bauersfeld, H. (1995). The structuring of the structures: Development and function of mathematizing as a social practice. In L. P. Steffe, & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 137-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bevilacqua, F., & Gianneto, E. (1996). The history of physics and European physics education. Science & Education, 5, 235-246.
Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decision making and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78, 185-201.
Binnie, A. (2001). Using the history of electricity and magnetism to enhance teaching. Science & Education, 10, 379-389.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals. New York: McKay: Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.
Bostrom, A. (2006). Sharing lived experience. How upper secondary school chemistry teachers and students use narratives to make chemistry more meaningful. Unpublished Ph Disseratation, Stockholm University Press, Stockholm.
Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 1164-1172.
Brush, S. J. (1989). History of science and science education. Interchange, 20(2), 60-70.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50 (1), 66-71.
Cobb, P. (1994a). Constructivism in mathematics and science education. Educational Researcher, 23, 4. Cobb, P. (1994b). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development. Educational Researcher, 23, 13-20.
Cobb, P. (1995). Continuing the conversation: A response to Smith. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 25-27.
Conant, J. (1957). Harvard case histories in experimental science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Confrey, J. (1990). A review of research on student conceptions in mathematics, science and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3-56.
Day J. D., French, L. A., & Hall, I. K. (1985). Social influences on cognitive development. In D. L Forrest- Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 33-56). Theoretical perspectives. New York: Academic Press.
DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice, teachers. New York: College Press.
Dedes, C. (2005). The mechanism of vision: conceptual similarities between historical models and children’s representations. Science & Education, 14, 699-712.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Perigree.
Driver, R., & Oldham, V. (1985). A constructivist approach to curriculum development. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Duhem, P. (1905/1954). The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dunn, R. (1993). Empires of physics - a new initiative in science education. School Science Review, 75, 135-137.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Egan, K. (1988). Primary understanding. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Egan, K. (1986). Teaching as story telling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Egan, K. (1989). The shape of the science text: A function of stories. In S. de Castell, A. Luke, & C. Luke (Eds.), Language, authority and criticism: Readings on the school textbook (pp. 96-108). New York: The Falmer Press.
Egan, K. (1990). Romantic understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco: Jossey - Bass.
Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.), (1996). Constructivism: theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gajdamaschko, N. (2005). Vygotsky on imagination: Why an understanding of the imagination is an important issue for schoolteachers. Teaching Education, 16(1), 13-22.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2001a). Experts’ views on using history and philosophy of science in the practice of physics instruction. Science & Education, 10, 345-367.
Gallili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). The influence of an historically oriented course on students’ content knowledge in optics evaluated by means of facets- schemes analysis. American Journal of Physics, 68, 3-15.
Gallili, I., & Hazan, A. (2001). The effect of a history-based course in optics on Students’ views about science. Science & Education, 10, 7-32.
Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe, & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 17-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Stefanich, G. (2001). Imagination in science education. Contemporary Education, 71, 23-28.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16, 23-32.
Haywood, H. (1927). Fundamental laws of chemistry. School Science Review, 9, 92.
Heering, P. (1994). The replication of the torsion balance experiment, the inverse square law and its refutation by early 19th-century German physicists. In C. Blondel & M. Dorries (Eds.), Restaging Coulomb. Usages, controverses et réplications autour de la balance de torsion (pp. 47-67). Firenze: Leo S. Olschki.
Izquierdo, M. (1995). Cognitive models of Science and the teaching of science, history of science and curriculum. In D. Phillos (Eds.), European research in science education-Proceeding of the second Ph D. summer school, art of text. Thessaloniki.
Jung, W. (1994). Toward preparing students for change: A critical discussion of the contribution of the history of physics in physics teaching. Science & Education, 3, 99-130.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
Kindi, V. (2005). Should science teaching involve the history of science? An assessment of Kuhn’s view. Science & Education, 14, 721-731.
Kipnis, N. (1996). The ‘historical-investigative’ approach to teaching science. Science & Education, 5, 277-292.
Kipnis, N. (1998). Theories as models in teaching physics. Science & Education, 7, 245-260.
Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37(1-2), 31-61. Klopfer, L. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. International Journal of Science Education, 6, 87-96.
Kokkotas, P., Malamitsa, K., & Rizaki, Α. (2008). Story telling as a strategy for understanding concepts of electricity and electromagnetism. In Proceedings of the Munich conference “The second international conference on story in science teaching”. Available at http://scied.org/Story-08-Proc.htm
Kokkotas, P., Piliouras P., Malamitsa, K., & Stamoulis, E. (2009).Teaching physics to in-service primary school teachers in the context of the history of science: The case of falling bodies. Science & Education, 18, 609-629.
Kokkotas, P., Piliouras, P., Malamitsa, K., Kokkotas, V., Stamoulis, E., Maurogiannakis, M., et al. (2009). The pedagogogical foundations of science teachers professional development. In P. Kokkotas & F. Bevilacqua, (Eds.), Professional development of science teachers, teaching science using case studies from the history of science. Amazon: Electronic Book. https://www.createspace.com :443/3362423.
Koul, R., & Dana, R. (1997). Contextualized science for teaching science and technology. Interchange,
28(2-3), 121-144.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. In International encyclopedia of unified science (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kyle, W. C. (1997). Assessing students’ understanding of science. Journal Research Science Teaching, 34, 851-852.
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003), Individual and sociocultural views of learning in science education. Science & Education, 12, 91-113.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296-316.
Luhl, J. (1990). The history of atomic theory with it societal and philosophical implications in chemistry classes. In D. E. Hergit (Eds.), More history and philosophy of science in science teaching (pp. 266-273). Tallahassee, FL: University of Florida Science Education Dept.
Mach, E. (1886/1986). On instruction the classics and the sciences. In Popular scientific lectures. La Sale, IL: Open Court Publishing Company.
Manna, C., & Minichiello, G. (2005). Imagination without images. Teaching Education, 16(1), 51-60. Maria, K., & Johnson, J. M. (1989). Correcting misconceptions: Effects of type of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading conference, Austin, TX.
Masson, S., & Vazquez-Abad, J. (2006). Integrating history of science in science education through historical microworlds to promote conceptual change. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15 (3), 257-268.
Matthews, M. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. London: Routledge. Matthews, M. R. (1992). History, philosophy and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science & Education, 1(1), 11-47.
McDermott, L. C. (1984). Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics. Physics Today, 22, 2-10. McMullin, E. (1985). Galilean idealization. Studies in history and philosophy of science, 16, 247-273. Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond processes. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33-62.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee J. H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.), (1998). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: A model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81, 405-427.
Mott, W. B., & Lester, J. (2006). Narrative- centered tutorial planning for inquiry-based learning environ- ments. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). Jhongli, Taiwan.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nerssessian, N. J. (1989). Conceptual change in science and in science education. Synthese, 80, 163-183.
Nerssessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach? What they practice? Science of Education, 4, 203-226.
Niaz, M. (1993). If Piaget’s epistemic subject is dead, shall we bury the scientific research methodology of idealization? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 809-812.
Niaz, M. (2000). Cases as idealized lattices: A rational reconstruction of students’ understanding of the behavior of cases. Science & Education, 9, 279-287.
Nickels, T. (1992). Good science as bad history: From order of knowing to order of being. In E. McMullin (Eds.), The social dimensions of science. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.
Nielsen, H., & Thomson, P. (1990). History and philosophy of science in physics education. International Journal of Science Education, 12(3), 308-316.
Noddings, N., & Witherell, C. (1991). Epilogue: Themes remembered and foreseen. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and Dialogue in Education (pp. 279-280). New York: Teachers College Press.
Novak, J. (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of pcychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167-193.
Novak, J. D. (1985). Metalearning and metaknowledge strategies to help students to learn how to learn. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structures and conceptual change. Orlando, FL: Academic.
O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking science education: Beyond Piagetian constructivism toward a socio- cultural model of teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 791-820.
Pearson, K. (1900). The grammar of science (2nd ed.). London: Adam and Charles Black.
Piaget, J., & Garcia, R. (1987). Psychogenesis and the history of science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Piaget, J. (1926). The language and thought of the child. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Pozo, J. (1987). Aprendidizaje de la ciencia y pensamiento causal. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Riegler, A. (2001). Towards a radical constructivist understanding of science. Foundations of Science, 6, 1-30.
Rizaki, A., & Kokkotas, P. (2010). The use of history and philosophy of science as a core for a socio- constructivist teaching approach of the concept of energy in primary education. Science & Education (in press).
Rudge, D., & Howe, E. (2009). An explicit and reflective approach to the use of history to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 18, 561-580.
Rutherford, F., Holton, G., & Watson, F. (1970). The project physics course: Text. New York: Holt, Rienhart and Wintson.
Rutherford, J. (2001). Fostering the history of science in American science education. Science & Education, 10, 569-580.
Schwab, J. J. (1964). Problems, topics, and issues. In S. Elam (Ed.), Education and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Sequera, M., & Leite, L. (1991). Alternative conceptions and history of science in physics teacher education. Science Education, 75(1), 45-56.
Smith, E. (1995). Where is the mind? Knowing and knowledge in Cobb’s constructivist and socio-cultural perspectives. Educational Researcher, 24, 23-24.
Stefanidou, C., & Vlachos, I. (2010). Could scientific controversies be used as a tool for teaching science in the compulsory education? The results of a pilot based on the Galileo-del Monte controversy about the motion of the pendulum. In P. V. Kokkotas, K. S Malamitsa, & A. A. Rizaki (Eds.), Adapting historical science knowledge production to the classroom. The Netherlands: Sense Publishers (in press).
Steffe, L., & Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Stevenson, L., & Byerly, H. (2000). The many faces of science. An introduction to scientists, values, and society. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Stinner, A., & Teichmann, J. (2003). Lord Kelvin and the age-of-the-Earth debate: A dramatization. Science & Education, 12, 213-228.
Stinner, A. (1995a). Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education. Science Education, 79(5), 555-581.
Stinner, A. (1995b). The contexts of inquiry in physics education: Supporting a motivational base and providing a theoretical structure. In L. Kovacs (Eds.), History of science in teaching physics. Extended proceedings of history teaching physics conference Szombathely (pp. 160-170).
Stinner, A. (1996). Providing a contextual base and a theoretical structure to guide the teaching of science from early years to senior years. Science & Education, 5, 247-266.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147-176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Thomson, P. (1998). The Historical-Philosophical dimension in physics teaching: Danish experiences. Science & Education, 7, 493-503.
Tobin, K. (1993). The Practice of constructivism in science and mathematics education. Washington, DC: AAAS Press.
Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: Vol. 1. The collective use and evolution of concepts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
UNESCO. (2000). Report of the world conference on science: Framework for action science sector. Paris Unesco.
Viennot, L. (1979). Spontaneous learning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, I, 205-221.
von Clasersfeld, E. (2001). The radical constructivist view of science. Foundations of Science, 6, 31-43.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). The reluctance to change a way of thinking. Special issue: Radical constructivism, autopoiesis and psychotherapy. Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 83-90.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1999). How do we mean? A constructivist sketch of semantics. Cybernetics & Human Learning, 6(1), 9-16.
Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of knowledge restructuring in development. Review of Educational Research, 51, 51-67.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1) (R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock, (Eds.). New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky (Vol. 5) (R. W. Rieber, & J. Wollock, (Eds.). New York: Plenum Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2003). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wandersee, J. H. (1985). Can the history of science help science educators anticipate student’s mis- conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23, 581-597.
Wandersee, J. H. (1992). The historicality of cognition: Implications for science education research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 423-434.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wiser, M., & Carey, S. (1983). When heat and temperature were one. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 267-297). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Yamalidou, M. (2001). Molecular representations: Building tentative links between the history of science and the study of cognition. Science & Education, 10, 423-451.
Panagiotis Kokkotas, profesor and Aikaterini Rizaki, PhD Faculty of Primary Education
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece e-mail: kokkotas@primedu.uoa.gr
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kokkotas, P., Rizaki, A. (2011). Does History of Science Contribute To The Construction of Knowledge In The Constructivist Environments of Learning?. In: Kokkotas, P.V., Malamitsa, K.S., Rizaki, A.A. (eds) Adapting Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_5
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-349-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)