Abstract
Historically, the most prominent and influential concepts regarding Critical Thinking were advanced by Ennis (1987), Paul, Binker and Weil (1995), Lippman (1991), Siegel (1988) and Sternberg (1985a, b; 1987) among others. However, due to the great difficulty in defining and therefore in assessing Critical Thinking, these conceptualizations only revealed different and often contradictory aspects of Critical Thinking instead of leading to a coherent theory. These multiple conceptualizations reflected where emphasis was given each time and consequently led to different approaches for assessment – i.e. as logical fallacies (Dreyfus, & Jungwirth, 1980; Jungwirth, 1987; Jungwirth, & Dreyfus, 1990), as formal reasoning processes or skills (Blair, & Johnson, 1980; Lawson, 1982, 1985; Obed, 1997), as scientific reasoning in general (Friedler, Nachmias, & Linn, 1990) etc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Sense Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malamitsa, K., Kasoutas, M., Kokkotas, P. (2011). Developing Greek Primary School Students’ Graph/Chart Interpretation and Reading Comprehension as Critical Thinking Skills. In: Kokkotas, P.V., Malamitsa, K.S., Rizaki, A.A. (eds) Adapting Historical Knowledge Production to the Classroom. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-349-5_13
Publisher Name: SensePublishers
Online ISBN: 978-94-6091-349-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)