Skip to main content

Abstract

Devising, or in generic terms, playbuilding, in widespread use in classrooms and applied theatre settings, has much to offer democratic pedagogy. Often devising has aspired to build community and create cohesive ensembles but what may these aspirations mask and in what ways might they insist on sameness rather than difference? This is important to consider because if these goals of devising are not made explicit and examined critically, there is the danger that these collectively created projects, however well-intentioned, become vehicles of conformity. If devising, in its efforts to build community demands sameness at the expense of difference, the potential for democratic pedagogy is lost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boler, M. (2005). Editor’s introduction: Troubling speech, Disturbing silence. In M. Boler (Ed.), Democratic dialogue in education: Troubling speech and disturbing silence. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castagno, A. E. (2008). “I don’t want to hear that!”: Legitimating whiteness through silence in schools. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 39(3), 314-333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, T. (2006). Letting the Drama into group work: Using conflict constructively in performing arts group practice. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5(33), 33-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In F. Barker, P. Hulme, & M. Iverson (Eds.), Postmodernism and the re-reading of modernity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. (2007). The theatre of urban: Youth and schooling in dangerous times. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govan, E., Nicholson, H., & Normington, K. (2007). Making a performance: Devising histories and contemporary practices. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddon, D., & Milling, J. (2006). Devising performance: A critical history. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey, L. L. (2005). Rethinking silencing silences. In M. Boler (Ed.), Democratic dialogue in education: Troubling speech and disturbing silence. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, E. (2008). Towards a poetics of popular theatre: Directing and authorship in community-based work. In B. Barton (Ed.), Collective creation, collaboration and devising. Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, H. (2005). Applied Drama: The gift of theatre. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). The ideal of community and the politics of difference. In L. Nicholson (Ed.), Feminism postmodernism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wessels, A. (2011). Devising as Pedagogy. In: Schonmann, S. (eds) Key Concepts in Theatre/Drama Education. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-332-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships