Skip to main content

Abstract

Interviewer: What would you say to a student who is thinking about applying for the AP [Accelerated Program]? Student: You get a second chance. You’ll have another opportunity to get to the ninth grade. The teachers will actually help you instead of saying that they will. They communicate with you. This student participated in a special program that 36 over-age students entered as seventh graders and 31 (86%) left as rising ninth graders. The program graduated 33 of 35 students (86%) the previous year. What happens in the Accelerated Program (AP) that allows struggling students a chance at success? Their success lies largely in the AP environment that gives over-age students a second chance to develop a sense of accomplishment, belonging, and engagement–all ingredients necessary to school and life success (Finnan, 2009).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, K., Entwisle, D. & Dauber, S. (2003). On the success of failure (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeland, J. M., Dilulio, J. J. & Morison, K. B. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Civic Enterprises. Retrieved July 16, 2007, from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/nr/downloads/ed/thesilentepidemic3-06final.pdf

  • Center for Mental Health in Schools. (2006). Grade retention: What’s the prevailing policy and what needs to be done? Los Angeles: Center for Mental Health in Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. P., & Joyner, E. T. (2006). Translating theory and research into practice through the Yale Child Study Center school development program. In M. A. Constas & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Translating theory and research into educational practice: Developments in content domains, large-scale reform, and intellectual capacity (pp. 151–172). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P. & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunner & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology (V.23, pp. 43–77).

    Google Scholar 

  • Courrege, D. (2007, September 4). “Mercedes of MGAP” gets students on track. The Post and Courier, pp. 1A, 9A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1900).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D. & Owings, J. (2006). The adult lives of at-risk students: The roles of attainment and engagement in high school. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnan, C. (2009). The upper elementary years: Ensuring success in grades 3–6. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, K. A., Kwok, O. & Hughes, J. N. (2007, March). The short-term effect of grade retention on peer relations and academic performance of at-risk first graders. The Elementary School Journal, 107(4), 327–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. (2005). Effects of Kindergarten retention policy on children’s cognitive growth in reading and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27, 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagaoka, J., & Roderick, M. (2004). Ending social promotion: The effects of retention. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research. Retrieved February 21, 2007, from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/publications.php?pub_id=12

  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (2006). Grade retention. The Condition of Education 2006. Retrieved March 1, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2006/pdf/25_2006.pdf

  • Pierson, L. H. & Connell, J. P. (1992). Effect of grade retention on self-system processes, school engagement, and academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 300–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, A. (1992). Grade retention and school adjustment: An explanatory analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roderick, M. (1993). The path to dropping out: Evidence for intervention. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spindler, G. D. (1978). The making of psychological anthropology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasley, P. A., Hampel, R. L., & Clark, R. W. (1997). Kids and school reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Finnan, C., Finnan, K.C., Mcpartland, C. (2011). We Are Family. In: Beyond the One Room School. SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-287-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships