Skip to main content

Human Rights as an Instrument of Social Cohesion in South Asia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights Education Globally

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 22))

Abstract

The chapter links human rights international standards and institutions to grass-roots human rights culture and its impact on social cohesion in South Asia. It begins with the analysis of the linkage between the concepts of human rights and social cohesion and draws attention to some complementarity of both concepts. Then it analyses how the international human rights standards and associated implementation machinery could be used to advance social cohesion around the world. The chapter analyses the contemporary social cohesion trends globally and in South Asia, and examines the role of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in advancing human rights culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a good discussion of the concepts of cultural relativism and universality of human rights see: Donnelly (1984).

  2. 2.

    There are also authors who argue that human rights are not universal in their nature. For example, some suggest that human rights serve to advance western domination (Douzinas 2000; Hopgood 2013). Others insist that, for human rights to apply in Islamic societies, Sharia law must also be reflected.

  3. 3.

    Since its creation in 2006 the UNHRC has convened some 30 urgent sessions with about 40% of them focussing on Israel and none on China, Iran, North Korea, Turkey, Yemen or Zimbabwe. UNHRC condemned Israel in more than 70 of its resolutions, that is about 50% of all resolutions since 2006 and the UNHRC only permanent agenda item reads: “Item 7. Human rights abuses by Israel.”

  4. 4.

    The UN experts include: Ms. E. Tendayi Achiume, Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance; Mr. Michal Balcerzak, Chairperson of the Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent; Mr. Jose Francisco Cali Tzai, Acting Chairperson of the Committee for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination; Mr. Felipe González Morales, Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants; Mr. Fernand de Varennes, Special Rapporteur on minority issues; Mr. Victor Madrigal-Borloz, Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity; Ms. Alda Facio, Chairperson of the Working Group on the issue of discrimination against women in law and in practice; Ms. Urmila Bhoola, Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of slavery, including its causes and consequences; Ms. Agnes Callamard, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights expert: Ms. Margarette May Macaulay, Rapporteur on the rights of Afro-descendants and against racial discrimination.

  5. 5.

    There are also some other significant challenges emerging to social cohesion in Australia. See: Ozdowski, S. (2017a, b). See also: Dunn et al. (2009).

  6. 6.

    For discussion of NHRI characteristics see: Ozdowski, S. (2003).

  7. 7.

    See also: Ozdowski, S (2009).

  8. 8.

    For discussion about human rights education in Australia see: Ozdowski There is also a range of good human rights education materials available elsewhere, see for example Council of Europe (2010) or European Commission (2012).

  9. 9.

    The first ICHRE was convened in 2010 in Sydney and since then the Conference has been held in: Durban, South Africa; Cracow, Poland; Taipei, Taiwan; Washington DC, USA; Middleburg, the Netherlands; Santiago, Chile; and Montreal, Canada; Sydney, Australia and Kathmandu (planned), Nepal. For more see the 9th ICHRE website: http://ichre2018.com.au; see also: www.westernsydney.edu.au/equity_diversity/equity_and_diversity/conferences

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sev Ozdowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ozdowski, S. (2020). Human Rights as an Instrument of Social Cohesion in South Asia. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Human Rights Education Globally. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1913-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1913-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1912-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1913-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics