Abstract
Rapidly evolving and ubiquitous digital communication technologies have played a crucial role in shaping the quality and textures of mobile intimacy in transnational family life. In this chapter, we illuminate how transnational caregiving performed through mobile devices and online platforms engenders intimate caregiving from afar. Drawing on data from in-depth interviews, we investigate how elite Filipino migrants in the United States use mobile media and a diverse range of networked platforms to deliver and negotiate caregiving at a distance among their left-behind and aging parents in the Philippines. This study extends the care circulation approach in the context of transnational familial communication through mobile media. We critically examine the role of mobile media in facilitating mediation of everyday and routinized carework, microcoordination of care, the management of tensions and conflicts, and the performance of care. Signicantly, we propose the term ‘mobile carework’ to articulate the intimate, personalised, mobile, and negotiated care practices of transnational family members that are often shaped by the fusion of socio-cultural and technological forces. In sum, this study provides critical insights on how familial intimacies and relations are sustained through the provision of digitalised and differential care routines.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
While universities in the Philippines are not formally ranked, the University of the Philippines, the Ateneo de Manila University, and De La Salle University are considered to be the top universities in the country. They are regularly listed in international rankings and are arguably the most difficult to get into. Their alumni associations in the Metropolitan Washington DC area are robust and active with large memberships.
References
Adey, P., Bissell, D., Hannam, K., Merriman, P., & Sheller, M. (2013). Introduction. In P. Adey, D. Bissell, K. Hannam, P. Merriman, & M. Sheller (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mobilities. New York: Routledge.
Aguilar, F. (2009). Labour migration and ties of relatedness: Diasporic houses and investments in memory in a rural Philippine village. Thesis Eleven, 98(1), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513609105485.
Baldassar, L. (2008). Missing kin and longing to be together: Emotions and the construction of co-presence in transnational relationships. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29(3), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860802169196.
Baldassar, L. (2014a). Guilty feelings and the guilt trip: Emotions and motivation in migration and transnational caregiving. Emotion, Space and Society, 16, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2014.09.003.
Baldassar, L. (2014b). Too sick to move: Distant ‘crisis’ care in transnational families. Revue Internationale de Sociologie, 24(3), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2014.954328.
Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2014a). Introduction: Transnational family caregiving through the lens of circulation. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 3–24). New York: Routledge.
Baldassar, L., & Merla, L. (2014b). Locating transnational care circulation in migration and family studies. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 25–60). New York: Routledge.
Baldassar, L., Baldock, C., & Wilding, R. (2007). Families caring across borders: Migration, ageing and transnational caregiving. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Baldassar, L., Nedelcu, M., Merla, L., & Wilding, R. (2016). ICT-based co-presence in transnational families and communities: Challenging the premise of face-to-face proximity in sustaining relationships. Global Networks, 16(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12108.
Baym, N. K. (2010). Personal connections in the digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Benitez, E. (2005). Changing patterns of filial responsibilities amongst Filipino families within the context of migration (Master’s Thesis). The University of South Australia, South Australia.
Blum-Ross, A., & Livingstone, S. (2017). ‘Sharenting,’ parent blogging, and the boundaries of the digital self. Popular Communication, 15(2), 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15405702.2016.1223300.
boyd, D. (2011). Participating in the always-on lifestyle. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 71–76). New York: New York University Press.
boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Brubaker, J. R., Hayes, G. R., & Dourish, P. (2013). Beyond the grave: Facebook as a site for the expansion of death and mourning. The Information Society, 29, 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.777300.
Burholt, V. (2004). Transnationalism, economic transfers and families’ ties: Intercontinental contacts of older Gujaratis, Punjabis and Sylhetis in Birmingham with families abroad. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27(5), 800–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987042000246354.
Bryceson, D., & Vuorela, U. (2002). The transnational family: New European frontiers and global networks. Oxford: Berg.
Cabalquinto, E. C. (2018a). I have always thought of my family first’: An analysis of transnational caregiving among Filipino migrant adult children in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Communication, 12, 4011–4029.
Cabalquinto, E. C. (2018b). ‘We’re not only here but we’re there in spirit’: Asymmetrical mobile intimacy and the transnational Filipino family. Mobile Media & Communication, 6(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157917722055.
Cabañes, J., & Acedera, K. (2012). Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: Calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media & Society, 14(6), 916–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811435397.
Claisse, G., & Rowe, F. (1993). Domestic telephone habits and daily mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 27(4), 277–290.
Commission on Overseas Filipinos. (2013). Stock estimates of overseas Filipinos as of December 2013. Manila: Commission on Overseas Filipinos. https://www.cfo.gov.ph/downloads/statistics/stock-estimates.html
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dai, Y.-T., & Dimond, M. (1998). Filial Piety. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 24(3), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-19980301-05.
Enli, G. S., & Thumim, N. (2012). Socializing and self-representation online: Exploring Facebook. Observatorio Journal, 6, 87–105.
Francisco, V. (2015). ‘The internet is magic’: Technology, intimacy and transnational families. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513484602.
Francisco-Menchavez, V. (2018). The labor of care: Filipina migrants and transnational families in the digital age. Oxfordshire: Marston Book Services Ltd.
Fresnoza-Flot, A. (2009). Migration status and transnational mothering: The case of Filipino migrants in France. Global Networks, 9(2), 252–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00253.x.
Goffman, E. (1959). Presentation of the self in everyday life. Garden City: Doubleday.
Hjorth, L., & Lim, S. S. (2012). Mobile intimacy in an age of affective mobile media. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2012.741860.
Hochschild, A. R. (2000). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In W. Hutton & A. Giddens (Eds.), On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130–146). London: Jonathan Cape.
Hoeffel, E. M., Rastogi, S., Kim, M. O., & Shahid, H. (2012). The Asian population: 2010 census briefs. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau.
Horst, H. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x.
Hutchby, I. (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 72, 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.012.
Kang, T. (2012). Gendered media, changing intimacy: Internet-mediated transnational communication in the family sphere. Media, Culture & Society, 34(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443711430755.
Keightley, E., & Reading, A. (2014). Mediated mobilities. Media, Culture & Society, 36(3), 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713517731.
Leinonen, A. M. (2011). Adult children and parental care-giving: Making sense of participation patterns among siblings. Ageing and Society, 31(2), 308–327. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001042.
Licoppe, C. (2004). ‘Connected’ presence: The emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1068/d323t.
Lim, S. S. (2016). Asymmetries in Asian families’ domestication of mobile communication. In S. S. Lim (Ed.), Mobile communication and the family: Asian experiences in technology domestication (pp. 1–12). London: Springer.
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Ling, R. (2004). The Mobile connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. London: Polity.
Lister, M., Dovey, J., Giddings, S., Grant, I., & Kelly, K. (2003). New media: A critical introduction. London/New York: Routledge.
Madianou, M. (2016). Ambient co-presence: Transnational family practices in polymedia environments. Global Networks, 16(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12105.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.
Mckay, D. (2016). An archipelago of care: Filipino migrants and global networks. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Medina, B. (2001). The Filipino family. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.
Merla, L. (2012). Salvadoran migrants in Australia: An analysis of transnational families’ capability to care across borders. International Migration, 53(6), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12024.
Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2000). The internet: An ethnographic approach. Oxford: Berg.
Moores, S. (2000). Media and everyday life in modern society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Morgan, D. H. G. (2011). Locating ‘family practices’. Sociological Research Online, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2535.
Nader, L. (1972). Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Reinventing anthropology (pp. 84–311). New York: Pantheon.
Nedelcu, M., & Wyss, M. (2016). ‘Doing family’ through ICT-mediated ordinary co-presence: Transnational communication practices of Romanian migrants in Switzerland. Global Networks, 16(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12110.
Ong, J. C., & Cabañes, J. V. (2011). Engaged, but not immersed: Tracking the mediated public connection of Filipino elite migrants in London. South East Asia Research, 19(2), 197–224.
Papacharissi, Z. (2009). The virtual geographies of social networks: A comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld. New Media and Society, 11(1–2), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808099577.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001a). Mothering from a distance: Emotions, gender, and intergenerational relations in Filipino transnational families. Feminist Studies, 27(2), 361–390.
Parreñas, R. S. (2001b). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford: Standford University Press.
Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Long distance intimacy: Class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families. Global Networks, 5(4), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00122.x.
Parreñas, R. S. (2014). The intimate labour of transnational communication. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3(3), 425–442.
Pe-Pua, R. (1989). Pagtatanong-tanong: A cross-cultural research method. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 13(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(89)90003-5.
Rafael, V. (1990). Nationalism, imagery, and the Filipino intelligentsia in the nineteenth century. Critical Inquiry, 16(3), 591–611.
Rakow, L., & Navarro, V. (1993). Remote mothering and the parallel shift: Women meet the cellular phone. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10(2), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039309366856.
Singh, S. (2016). Money, migration and family: India to Australia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Singh, S., & Cabraal, A. (2014). ‘Boomerang remittances’ and the circulation of care: A study of Indian transnational families in Australia. In L. Baldassar & L. Merla (Eds.), Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care: Understanding mobility and absence in family life (pp. 220–234). New York: Routledge.
Soriano, G. (1995). Filipino families in Australia. In R. Hartley (Ed.), Families & cultural diversity in Australia (pp. 96–120). St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.
Sung, K. T. (1998). Filial piety in modern times: Timely adaptation and practice patterns. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 17, 88–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6612.1998.tb00872.x.
Thai, H. C. (2012). The dual roles of transnational daughters and transnational wives: Monetary intentions, expectations and dilemmas. Global Networks, 12, 216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2012.00348.x.
Thumim, N. (2012). Self-representation and digital culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Uy-Tioco, C. (2007). Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: Reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum, 21(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310701269081.
Uy-Tioco, C. (2017). Transnational ties: Elite Filipino migrants and polymedia environments. In L. K. Lopez & V. Pham (Eds.), The Routledge companion to Asian American Media (pp. 249–260). London/New York: Routledge.
Vertovec, S., & Cohen, R. (2002). Conceiving cosmopolitanism: Theory, context, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vincent, J., & Fortunati, L. (2015). The emotional identity of the mobile phone. In G. Gerard & L. Hjorth (Eds.), The Routledge companion to mobile media (pp. 312–319). New York: Routledge.
We Are Social. (2019). Digital in 2019. Retrieved from https://wearesocial.com/global-digital-report-2019
Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x.
Wilding, R., & Baldassar, L. (2018). Ageing, migration and new media: The significance of transnational care. Journal of Sociology, 54(2), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783318766168.
World Bank. (2015). Open data. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Vincent Pham and Cheryll Ruth Soriano for the insightful comments and feedback they gave during their review of this chapter. We are also grateful for comments received during presentations of early versions of this chapter at the 2019 Immigration and Diaspora Studies Symposium at California State University San Marcos and the 2019 Cultural Studies Association conference at Tulane University, New Orleans, LA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uy-Tioco, C.S., Cabalquinto, E.C.B. (2020). Transnational Mobile Carework: Filipino Migrants, Family Intimacy, and Mobile Media. In: Cabañes, J.V.A., Uy-Tioco, C.S. (eds) Mobile Media and Social Intimacies in Asia. Mobile Communication in Asia: Local Insights, Global Implications. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1790-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1790-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1789-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1790-6
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)