Skip to main content

Social Change and Education Reforms in High Performing Education Systems: Policy Lessons from Singapore and Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalisation, Ideology and Education Reforms

Part of the book series: Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research ((GCEP,volume 20))

Abstract

Both Singapore and Hong Kong have been ranked top (first and second) in international rankings such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), Progress in International Reading Literacy Studies (PIRLS), and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) in recent years. As such they are thus widely admired as high performing education systems (HPES) and, not surprisingly, among the best education systems in the world. The success stories of Singapore and Hong Kong education have aroused widespread attention among different stakeholders such as policymakers, researchers and practitioners internationally to see if it is possible for their policies and practices to be learnt and borrowed by other countries. Moreover, we stress the importance of context in understanding policy phenomena and possibilities for policy transfer. The two HPES are also encountering problems arising from globalisation and social change, and how well they deal with these problems will determine if their present international standing continues into the future. In addition, as both Singapore and Hong Kong are in the stage of post-developmental states, this chapter provides a critical review of education policies and reforms in both Singapore and Hong Kong to see how they can be refined and adjusted in order to cope with challenges facing both education systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amir, H. (2013, August 26). Singaporeans want ‘compassionate meritocracy’. Today, 26 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, N. (2015). Negotiating Singapore’s meritocracy: A subtle shift? RSIS Commentary, No. 30, 12 February. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, M. (2014). The ruling elite of Singapore: Networks of power and influence. London/New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). Capitalism and social progress. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1988). The developmental city-state in an open world economy: The Singapore experience (Working Paper 31). Institute of International Studies. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census and Statistics Department, HKSAR Government. (2017. June 6). Press release: Census and Statistics Department announces results of study on household income distribution in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census and Statistics Department, HKSAR Government. (2018). Hong Kong annual digest of statistics, 2018 edition. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D., & Tan, J. (2008). Privatization and the rise of direct subsidy scheme schools and independent schools in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 464–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chua, V., & Ng, I. (2015). Unequal returns to social capital: The study of Malays in Singapore through a network lens. Asian Ethnicity, 16(4), 480–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davie, S. (2013, August 23). Widening doors to top schools. The Straits Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davie, S. (2017, August 20). S’pore students suffer from high levels of anxiety: Study. The Sunday Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Z., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau, HKSAR Government. (2019). Figure and statistics. Website: http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/about-edb/publications-stat/figures/index.html

  • Education Commission, HKSAR. (1999). Learning for life: Review of education system – Framework for education reform. Hong Kong: Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission, & HKSAR. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestier, K., Adamson, B., Han, C., & Morris, P. (2016). Referencing and borrowing from other systems: The Hong Kong education reforms. Educational Research, 58(2), 149–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. (1997, June 2). Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the opening of the 7th international conference on thinking. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, C. (2015, August 18). Tilting the playing field for a more equitable society. Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S. (2015). Education. Singapore: Straits Times Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S., & Lee, M. H. (2013). Reforming curriculum in Singapore and Hong Kong. In Z. Deng, S. Gopinathan & C. Lee (Eds.), Globalisation and the Singapore curriculum: From policy to classroom (pp. 225–240).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopinathan, S., & Mardiana, B. (2013). Globalisation, the state and curriculum reform. In Z. Deng, S. Gopinathan & C. Lee (Eds.), Globalisation and the Singapore curriculum: From policy to classroom (pp. 15–32).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng, S. (2012). Keynote address by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Minister for Education, at the Ministry of Education, Work Plan Seminar, 12 September. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, K. (2010). Social mobility in Singapore. In T. Chong (Ed.), Management of success: Singapore revisited (pp. 217–241). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, E. (2017). In search of equal and excellent basic education in Hong Kong: Insights from programme for international student assessment. In T. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong (pp. 73–94). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview with Tan Chuan-Jin. (2017). Early action to break cycle of poverty in Singapore. The Straits Times, 17 July 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C. (2017). Connecting for consensus and a better future: Manifesto of Carrie Lam chief executive election 2017. Hong Kong: Campaign Office of Carrie Lam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H. (2009). Private education policy at a crossroads: Comparing Hong Kong and Singapore. In K. Mok & R. Forrest (Eds.), Changing governance and public policy in East Asia (pp. 228–252). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H. (2010). Internationalizing universities: Comparing China’s Hong Kong and Singapore (1996–2006). In D. Chapman, W. Cummings, & G. Postiglione (Eds.), Crossing borders in East Asian higher education (pp. 283–315). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2017). National Day Rally speech 2017. Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2019). National Day Rally speech 2019. Singapore: Prime Minister’s Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Morris, P. (2016). Lifelong learning, income inequality and social mobility in Singapore. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 35(3), 286–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. H., & Tse, T. (2017). Introduction: Setting and issues. In T. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: Achievements and challenges (pp. 1–20). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Council, HKSAR. (2016). Fact sheet: Hong Kong in figures 2016. Hong Kong: Research Office, Legislative Council Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, Y., Chong, E., & Yuen, T. (2017). Civic education in Hong Kong: From the colonial era to the post-occupy movement era. In T. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: Achievements and challenges (pp. 127–144). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. (2013). Meritocracy, elitism, and egalitarianism: A preliminary and provisional assessment of Singapore’s primary education review. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, K. (2019). The trouble with trying to turn Hong Kong’s young people into ‘patriotic youth.’ South China Morning Post, 21 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. & Teng, K. (2017). Figuring out the right path for political evolution. The Straits Times, 22 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, M., Lim, L., & Teng, S. (2017). Parents’ perceptions of the Singapore primary school system. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (1987). Towards excellence in schools: A report to the Minister for Education. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2018). Education statistics digest 2018. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2019). Updates to PSLE2021 scoring system: Enabling students to progress, regardless of starting points, 25 July. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Finance, Singapore. (2019). Budget 2019: Building a strong, united Singapore. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K., & Tan, J. (2004). Globalisation and marketization in education: A comparative analysis of Hong Kong and Singapore. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. (2016). Education policy, cross-national tests of pupil achievement, and the pursuit of world-class schooling: A critical analysis. London: UCL Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. (2011). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016a). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016b). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, P. (2008). The phases and paradoxes of education quality assurance: The case of the Singapore education system. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(2), 112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, I. (2013). Education and intergenerational mobility in Singapore. Educational Review, 2013, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 results: Students’ well-being. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2019). Results from TALIS (Teaching and Learning International Survey) 2018: Singapore. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Y. (2019). Ministry of Education Financial Year 2019 Committee of Supply Debate Response by Minister for Education Ong Ye Kung, 5 March. Singapore: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament: KidStart scheme to start with 1,000 vulnerable children in second half of 2016. The Straits Times, 12 April 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seow, J. (2017). Reserved presidential elections unique stabiliser in S’pore system: ESM Goh. The Sunday Times, 20 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsuri, J. (2015). Evaluating the work of Singapore’s Malay-based organizations in raising the educational attainment of the ethnic community: A continuing analysis. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 4(1), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New directions in the Singapore school system? Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Department of Statistics. (2018a). Key household income trends (p. 2018). Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Department of Statistics. (2018b). Yearbook of statistics Singapore 2018. Singapore: Department of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (2015). Economization of education: Human capital, global corporations, skills-based schooling. New York/Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (1997). Improving Malay educational achievement in Singapore: Problems and policies. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 17(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (1998). The marketisation of education in Singapore: Policies and implications. International Review of Education, 44(1), 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2006). Limited decentralization in the Singapore education system. In C. Bjork (Ed.), Educational decentralization (pp. 59–70). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2008). Meritocracy and elitism in a global city: Ideological shifts in Singapore. International Political Science Review, 29(1), 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2010a). Education in Singapore: Sorting them out? In T. Chong (Ed.), Management of success: Singapore revisited (pp. 288–308). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2010b). The transformation of meritocracy. In T. Chong (Ed.), Management of success: Singapore revisited (pp. 272–287). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. (2012). Fourth way in action: Teacher education in Singapore. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2014). Closing the achievement gap in Singapore. In J. Clark (Ed.), Closing the achievement gap from an international perspective (pp. 251–262). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2017). Governing global-city Singapore: Legacies and futures after Lee Kuan Yew. Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. (2018). Singapore: Identity, brand, power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2019a). Equity and meritocracy in Singapore. In S. Teng, M. Manzon, & K. Poon (Eds.), Equity in excellence: Experiences of East Asian high-performing education systems (pp. 111–126). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, J. (2019b). University governance and management in Singapore: The case of the Singapore Institute of Management University (UNSIM). In D. Chang, M. Lee, & H. Loke (Eds.), The governance and management of universities in Asia: Global influences and local responses (pp. 112–118). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., & Dimmock, C. (2015). Tensions between meritocracy and equity in Singapore: Educational issues in preparing a workforce for the knowledge-based economy. Singapore: The Head Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2018). Worldwide educating for the future index 2018: Building tomorrow’s global citizens. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Heritage Foundation. (2019). 2019 index of economic freedom. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • The rich are always with us. The Economist, 16 July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, W. (2011). Analysis of education policy in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (xianggang tequ jiaoyu zhengce fenxi). Hong Kong: Joint Publishing. [in Chinese].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, T. (2008). Choices for whom? The rhetoric and reality of the Direct Subsidy Scheme in Hong Kong (1988–2006). Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 628–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse, T. (2017). Should there be public reporting of school performance?: The lessons from the school inspection reports disputes. In T. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: achievements and challenges (pp. 161–179). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee, HKSAR Government. (2018). University Grants Committee annual report 2017–18. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, B. (2013). Political meritocracy in Singapore: Lessons from the PAP government. In D. Bell & C. Li (Eds.), The East Asian challenge for democracy: Political meritocracy in comparative perspective (pp. 288–313). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, J. (2017). Parental choice in the new education market: Aided-turn-direct subsidy scheme schools in focus. In T. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: Achievements and challenges (pp. 40–53). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2017a). The inclusive growth and development report 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2017b). The global human capital report 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2018). The global competitiveness report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuen, C. (2017). Changing student diversity, changing cultures and changing education policies: Cross-boundary students, Chinese immigrant students and non-Chinese speaking students in focus. In T. Tse & M. Lee (Eds.), Making sense of education in post-handover Hong Kong: achievements and challenges (pp. 200–214). Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2014). Debunking the myth of the lazy Malays. MENDAKI occasional paper series: Education, No. 1. Singapore: Yayasan Mendaki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y. (2015). Lessons that matter: What should we learn from Asia’s school systems? Mitchell Institute discussion and policy paper No. 04/2015. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute for Health and Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael H. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, M.H., Gopinathan, S. (2020). Social Change and Education Reforms in High Performing Education Systems: Policy Lessons from Singapore and Hong Kong. In: Zajda, J. (eds) Globalisation, Ideology and Education Reforms. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1743-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1743-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1742-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1743-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics