Accumulating Insights: The Problem of Motion Along Broken Chords Driving Conceptual Development

  • Jochen Büttner
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 335)


The chapter discusses how Galileo’s attempt to approximate motion along an arc by naturally accelerated motion along paths composed of a series of inclined planes, in or around 1602—and thus, as he believed, in due course pendulum motion—bestowed him with a number of new results. These results were to have repercussions far beyond the narrower context of the investigation into the relation between swinging and rolling from which they had originally ensued. Most of the insights achieved, propositions formulated and methods developed in that period, indeed became core assets of the new science of motion and found their way into the Discorsi more than 35 years later. It is, in particular, demonstrated how, as a by-product of his attempts to construct a proof for the so-called law of the broken chord, Galileo developed a new technique for rendering the kinematics of motion combining the representation of spacial and temporal aspects of motion in just one single diagram. In this period Galileo, in particular, scrutinized the especially challenging problem of finding the geometrical configuration under which the time of motion along a path allowed to vary in a geometrically defined manner became minimal. The problem remained unsolvable, yet his attempts at a solution resulted in the formulation of a set of new propositions complete with proof that were later included, many of them almost verbatim, in the Discorsi.


  1. Büttner, J. (2017). Shooting with ink. In M. Valleriani (Ed.), The structures of practical knowledge (pp. 115–166). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caverni, R. (1972). Storia del metodo sperimentale in Italia. New York: Johnson Reprint.Google Scholar
  3. Damerow, P., Renn, J., & Rieger, S. (2001). Hunting the white elephant: When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? In J. Renn (Ed.), Galileo in context (pp. 29–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Damerow, P., Freudenthal, G., McLaughlin, P., & Renn, J. (2004). Exploring the limits of preclassical mechanics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drake, S. (1978). Galileo at work: His scientific biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Galilei, G., Crew, H., & Salvio, A.D. (1954). Dialogues concerning two new sciences. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Palmieri, P. (2006). A new look at Galileo’s search for mathematical proofs. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 60, 285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Renn, J. (1990). Galileo’s theorem of equivalence: The missing keystone of his theory of motion. In T.H. Levere & W.R. Shea (Eds.), Nature, experiment, and the sciences: Essays on Galileo and the history of science in honour of Stillman Drake. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Wisan, W.L. (1974). The new science of motion: A study of Galileo’s De motu locali. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 13, 103–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wisan, W.L. (1981). Galileo and the emergence of a new scientific style (pp. 311–339). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Büttner
    • 1
  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for the History of ScienceBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations