Skip to main content

Coupling Traffic and Gas Dispersion Simulation for Atmospheric Pollution Estimation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: GeoJournal Library ((GEJL,volume 118))

Abstract

A CyberGIS approach is presented in this chapter where microscopic traffic simulation and gas dispersion simulation systems are combined in order to estimate atmospheric pollution for different scenarios. The combination of these two simulation models allows for detailed investigations of different situations such as the investigation of pollution impacts of different traffic infrastructure variants, as well as for prediction of expected pollution and whether pollutant thresholds will be exceeded. For different case studies, real data about traffic movements provided by the state government, a digital terrain model of the area as well as real measurements of atmospheric data have been used. The evaluation of the approach shows that variations in the settings, regarding traffic or atmospheric conditions, lead to different patterns of observed pollution. The CyberGIS environment described is used to run multiple simulations on a distributed cyberinfrastructure, where the high-end computational resources are available on servers in Europe and in North America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.openstreetmap.org.

  2. 2.

    http://www.geotools.org.

References

  • Acutt MZ, Dodgos, JS (1998) Transport and climate change: a review. J Trans Geogr 15(5):354–367. pages 20–37. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zanaidi M, Singh MP, El-Karim M (1994) Traffic co-dispersion pattern in Kuwait. Atmos Environ 25A(5/6):909–914

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer M, Rieser M, Meister K, Charypar D, Lefebvre N, Nagel K, Axhausen K (2008) MATSim-T: architecture and simulation times. In: Bazzan ALC, Klügl F (eds) Multi-agent systems for traffic and transportation engineering

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervone G, Franzese P, Ezber Y, Boybeyi Z (2008) Risk assessment of atmospheric emissions using machine learning. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:991–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman L (2007) Transport and climate change: a review. J Transp Geogr 15(5):354–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallmeyer J, Lattner AD, Timm IJ (2011) From GIS to mixed traffic simulation in urban scenarios. In: Liu J, Quaglia F, Eidenbenz S, Gilmore S (eds) 4th international ICST conference on simulation tools and techniques, SIMUTools ’11, Barcelona, Spain, March 22–24, 2011. ICST (Institute for computer sciences, social-informatics and telecommunications engineering), Brüssel, pp 134–143. ISBN 978-1-936968-00-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmeyer J, Lattner AD, Timm IJ (2012) Pedestrian simulation for urban traffic scenarios. In: Bruzzone AG (ed) Proceedings of the summer computer simulation conference 2012. 44rd summer simulation multi-conference (SummerSim’12). Curran Associates, Inc., pp 414–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmeyer J, Schumann R, Lattner AD, Timm IJ (2012) Don’t go with the ant flow: ant-inspired traffic routing in urban environments. In: Seventh international workshop on agents in traffic and transportation (ATT 2012), Valencia, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallmeyer J, Taubert C, Lattner AD, Timm IJ (2012) Fuel consumption and emission modeling for urban scenarios. In: Troitzsch KG, Möhring M, Lotzmann U (eds) Proceedings of the 26th EUROPEAN conference on modelling and simulation, pp 567–573. ISBN 978-0-9564944-4-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Delling D, Sanders P, Schultes D, Wagner D (2009) Engineering route planning algorithms. In: Lerner J, Wagner D, Zweig KA (eds) Algorithmics of large and complex networks, pp 117–139

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Di Sabatino S, Buccolieri R, Pulvirenti B, Britter R (2008) Flow and pollutant dispersion in street canyons using FLUENT and ADMS-Urban. Environ Model Assess 13:369–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-007-9106-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese P, Huq P (2011) Urban dispersion modelling and experiments in the daytime and nighttime atmosphere. Bound-Layer Meteorol 139:395–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-011-9593-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild M (Feb 2012) CyberGIS: what still needs to be done? Opening Keynote, CyberGIS Workshop, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualtieri G, Tartaglia M (1998) Predicting urban traffic air pollution: a GIS framework. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 3(5):329–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzopoulou M, Hao JY, Miller EJ (2011) Simulating the impacts of household travel on greenhouse gas emissions, urban air quality, and population exposure. Transportation 38:871–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey T (2012) Cyberinfrastructure moves forward. Accessed 10 Sep 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Ketzel M, Vardoulakis S, Pirjola L, Britter R (2011) Dynamics and dispersion modelling of nanoparticles from road traffic in the urban atmospheric environment-a review. J Aerosol Sci 42(9):580–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li K, Waters N (2005) Transportation networks, case-based reasoning and traffic collision analysis: a methodology for the 21st century. In: Methods and models in transport and telecommunications, pp 63–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J de Phys I 2(12):2221–2229

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxendine C, Sonwalkar M, Waters N (2012) A multi-objective, multi-criteria approach to improve situational awareness in emergency evacuation routing using mobile phone data. Trans GIS 16(3):375–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders P, Schultes D (2005) Highway hierarchies hasten exact shortest path queries. In: Brodal GS, Leonardi S (eds) Algorithms–ESA 2005, Proceedings of the 13th annual European symposium, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, 3–6 Oct 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3669. Springer, pp 568–579. ISBN 3-540-29118-0

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Schäfer R-P (1998) An integrated simulation system for traffic induced air pollution. Environ Model Soft 13(3–4):295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh MP, Goyal P, Basu S, Agarwal P, Nigam S, Kumari M, Panwar TS (1990) Predicted and measured concentrations of traffic carbon monoxide over Delhi. Atmos Environ 24A(4):801–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow A, Lux T, Mieth P, Schäfer R-P (1997) Simulation of traffic-induced air pollution for mesoscale applications. Math Comput Simul 43(3–6):285–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes RI, Gabruk RS (1997) A second-order closure model for the effect of averaging time on turbulent plume dispersion. J Appl Meteorol 36:165–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes RI, Lewellen WS, Parker SF (1984) A turbulent transport model for concentration fluctuation and fluxes. J Fluid Mech 139:193–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Anselin L, Bhaduri B, Crosby C, Goodchild MF, Liu Y, Nyerges TL (2013) Cybergis software: a synthetic review and integration roadmap. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, (ahead-of-print):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters NM (2002) Modeling the environmnent with GIS: a historical perspective from geography. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work performed under this project has been partially supported by the US Department of Transportation award 202717 (RITARS-12-H-GMU, CFDA), and by the MainCampus scholarship of the Stiftung Polytechnische Gesellschaft Frankfurt am Main. Special thanks to Hessen Mobil for providing ODM (Origin-Destination-Matrices) of the modelled simulation area and to the Hessisches Landesamt für Bodenmanagement und Geoinformation for allocation of a Digital Terrain Model of the measurement area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Cervone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cervone, G., Dallmeyer, J., Lattner, A.D., Franzese, P., Waters, N. (2019). Coupling Traffic and Gas Dispersion Simulation for Atmospheric Pollution Estimation. In: Wang, S., Goodchild, M. (eds) CyberGIS for Geospatial Discovery and Innovation. GeoJournal Library, vol 118. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1531-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics