Skip to main content

Universities, Community Engagement and the ‘Public Good’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The University in its Place

Abstract

The prospects of regional partnerships may have been successfully boosted by public policies and economic circumstances of the past two decades, but the notion of public and community ‘engagement’, often understood at local level, has always been a distinctive mission associated with universities. In recent years, discourses of engagement have also tended to emphasise historical and geographical circumstances of universities as key drivers of expression of their civic engagement (Goddard 2009). It is with this attention to contexts in mind that this chapter seeks to highlight and analyse the patterns of public and community engagement observed in the case studies of our research project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the UK, a Higher Education—Business and Community Interaction (HE–BCI) survey has been conducted annually since 1999 by the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) for HEFCE, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS), the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), the Higher Education Funding Council for Wales (HEFCW) and the Department for Employment and Learning (DELNI). It focuses on ‘specific interactions with external partners, such as contract and collaborative research, consultancy, continuing professional development and intellectual property’ (HEFCE 2014). The survey has informed funding allocations for third stream activities of universities through the Higher Education Innovation Funding (HEIF) since 2006.

  2. 2.

    The six beacons were university-based collaborative centres that were set up in 2008 to support, recognise, reward and build capacity for public engagement, with a lifespan of four years. Details of the initiative are available at https://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/nccpe-projects-and-services/completed-projects/beacons-public-engagement (accessed November2017).

  3. 3.

    The economic output of the region was in 2008 (at the time of our fieldwork) almost £119 billion, which represented 13% of the total UK gross value added (GVA), the third largest of the nine English regions (Young and Sly 2011). Northville, where Glocal U is established, accounts for over half the population of the region and incorporates over half of its industrial capacity and service activities.

  4. 4.

    The Russell Group is a membership interest organisation currently comprising 24 of the most reputed and selective universities in the UK.

References

  • Adlong, W. (2013). Rethinking the talloires declaration. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 14(1), 56–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspirational University. (2007). Strategic plan 2007–11. Accessed May 2014, University website.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benneworth, P. (Ed.), (2013). University engagement with socially excluded communities. Dordrecsht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, G., Conway, C., & van der Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies, 37(9), 887–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Durazzi, N., & Séné, T. (2013). Things we know and don’t know about the wider benefits of higher education: A review of the recent literature. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. http://www.lse.ac.uk/businessAndConsultancy/LSEConsulting/pdf/BIS-report-Final.pdf. Accessed November 2015.

  • Dempsey, S. E. (2010). Critiquing community engagement. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 359–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, H. E., Bruns, K., Sonka, S. T., Furco, A., & Swanson, L. (2012). The centrality of engagement in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(3), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffikin, F., & Morrissey, M. (2008). A new synergy for universities: Redefining academy as an ‘engaged institution’. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 3(1), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J. (2009). Re-inventing the civic university. NESTA. https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/reinventing_the_civic_university.pdf. Accessed November 2015.

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2012). Key facts and figures: equality data overview for 2009–10. Bristol: HEFCE. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/whatwedo/leadershipgovernanceandmanagement/equalityanddiversity/equality_overview_200910.pdf. Accessed November 2015.

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2014). Higher education—business and community interaction survey (2012–2013). Bristol: HEFCE. Available at: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/2014/201410/HEFCE2014_10.pdf. Accessed November 2015.

  • Lebeau, Y., & Bennion, A. (2014). Forms of embeddedness and discourses of engagement: A case study of universities in their local environment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebeau, Y., & Cochrane, A. (2015). Rethinking the ‘third mission’: UK universities and regional engagement in challenging times. European Journal of Higher Education, 5(3), 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, E., & Laing, S. (2007). The CUPP model in context’. In A. Hart, E. Maddison, & D. Wolff (Eds.), (2007), Community-university partnerships in practice. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. (2010). Teaching and researching Africa in an ‘engaged’ way: the possibilities and limitations of ‘community engagement. Journal of Higher Education in Africa, 8(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northmore, S., & Hart, A. (2011). Sustaining community-university partnerships. Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement, 4, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. (2001). Re-inserting the ‘public good’ into higher education transformation. KAGISANO Higher Education Discussion Series, 1, 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2007). Managing civic and community engagement. McGraw-Hill/Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., & Sly, F. (2011). Portrait of the North West. Regional Trends, 43(1), 169–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Brennan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brennan, J., Cochrane, A., Lebeau, Y., Williams, R. (2018). Universities, Community Engagement and the ‘Public Good’. In: The University in its Place. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1296-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1296-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1294-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1296-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics