Disaster Risk Evaluation – Quantitative Methods in Canada

  • Nirupama Agrawal
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 49)


Understanding risk and vulnerabilities forms the basis for a comprehensive approach to addressing the potential impacts of disasters in populated areas. Risk is a function of hazard and people’s vulnerabilities. It must be noted that there is a likelihood of specific hazards occurring in certain geographic areas and/or certain times of year. When they do occur, we can expect adverse impacts on people’s health, lives, property and/or the environment. To keep the damage to a minimum, these impacts must be understood in advance. This chapter outlines three quantitative risk assessment methods developed by two of Canada’s most populous provinces, Ontario and British Columbia, as well as the federal agency, Public Safety Canada.


  1. ADRC (2005) Major disasters in FY2005. Accessed 10 Jan 2016
  2. Armenakis C, Nirupama N (2014) Flood risk mapping for the City of Toronto. Proc Econ Fin, Elsevier 18:320–326Google Scholar
  3. EMDAT (2015) International disaster database. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Accessed 17 Jan 2016
  4. EMO (2012) Hazard identification and risk assessment for the Province of Ontario, Emergency Management Ontario. Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  5. Ferrier N, Haque CE (2003) Hazards risk assessment methodology for emergency managers: a standardized framework for application. Nat Hazards 28(2):271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Government of Ontario (2009) Emergency management and Civil Protection Act, RSO 1990, cE9, December 15, 2009, Ministry of Community Safety & Correctional Services, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  7. HIRA (2012) The Ontario provincial hazard identification and risk assessment. Ministry of Community Safety and Correctional Services. Accessed 27 Jan 2016
  8. HRVA (2004) Hazard, risk, and vulnerability assessment toolkit. Emergency Management British Columbia, Canada.
  9. Jonkman SN, van Gelder PHAJM, Vrijling JK (2003) An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. J Hazard Mater A99:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. National Hurricane Center (NHC) (2016) Accessed 11 Mar 2016
  11. Natural Resources Canada (2016) Natural Resource Canada, Government of Canada.
  12. Nirupama N, Armenakis C, Montpetit M (2014a) Is flooding in Toronto a concern? Nat Hazards 72(2):1259–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nirupama N, Adhikari I, Sheybani A (2014b) Natural hazards in Ontario Canada – taking stock for mitigating disasters. Procedia Economics and Finance, Elsevier 18:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. NOAA (2009) Weather, national oceanic and atmospheric association. Accessed 14 Jan 2016
  15. NOAA (2016) National oceanic and atmospheric administration,
  16. NWS (2009) National weather service. Accessed 14 Jan 2016
  17. PSC (2015) The Canadian disaster database, Public Safety Canada., Accessed 11 Mar 2016
  18. PSC (2016) All hazards risk assessment (AHRA) methodology guidelines 2012–2013. Public Safety Canada Accessed 17 Jan 2016
  19. Statistics Canada (2015) Accessed 17 Jan 2016
  20. World Bank (2016) Data, World Bank. Accessed 11 Mar 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nirupama Agrawal
    • 1
  1. 1.York UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations