Skip to main content

China’s Rising Power in Southeast Asia and Its Impact on Regional Institution-Building: Who Is Leading Whom?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Initiatives of Regional Integration in Asia in Comparative Perspective

Part of the book series: United Nations University Series on Regionalism ((UNSR,volume 14))

Abstract

The chapter explores China’s rise from a leadership perspective using Southeast Asia as a test case. Leadership is conceptualized in materialist and constructivist terms. It is argued that China increasingly sets the rules in this world region. Competing with Japan and the US over regional leadership China forges strategic links to Southeast Asian neighbours in terms of investments, trade relations and aid. China also increasingly engages in multilateral cooperation and sets up respective initiatives to manage international problems. This should not be taken as a preference for multilateralism per se, but has to be seen in the light of China’s core interests of regional stability and resource seeking. The ASEAN states make room for a rising China as they benefit from increasing trade and stability. Due to the different interests of ASEAN, China’s rise brings also the potential for greater conflict in inner-ASEAN relations. The argument is developed by linking theories of regional powers, leadership and regionalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more details on the development of merchandise trade between China and ASEAN member-countries (based on UNCOMTRADE data) see also Chen, Chap. 2, in this volume.

  2. 2.

    See also Loewen, Chap. 5, in this volume.

  3. 3.

    See also Krahl and Dosch, Chap. 4, in this volume.

  4. 4.

    On the China-ASEAN FTA see also Chen, Chap. 2, in this volume.

References

  • Acharya, A. (1999). Containment, engagement, or counter-dominance? Malaysia’s response to the rise of China. In A. I. Johnston & R. S. Ross (Eds.), Engaging China: The management of an emerging power (pp. 129–151). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (2012). ASEAN Statistics. http://www.asean.org/resources/2012-02-10-08-47-55/asean-statistics.

  • Ba, A. (2003). China and ASEAN: Renavigating Relations for a 21st century Asia. Asian Survey, 43(4), 622–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ba, A. (2010). Who’s socialising whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC Monitoring Global Newsline Asia Pacific Economic file, 3 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1979). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussman, M., & Oneal, J. R. (2004). Can A hegemon distribute private benefits to its allies? A test of power Transition theory. Paper presented for presentation at the annual ISA Convention, Montreal, March 17–20, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünte, M. & Schüller, M. (2011). China and Southeast Asia, unpublished report, Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies, p 170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünte, M., & Nabers, D. (2013). Turning material capabilities into leadership. China in Southeast Asia. In X. Huang & R. Patman (Eds.), China and the international system. Becoming a world power (pp. 108–125). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., & Weaver, O. (2003). Regions and powers. The structure of international security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, S. Y. (2004). The rise of China and emergent East Asian regionalism. In K. Ryosei & W. Jisi (Eds.), The rise of China and a changing East Asian order (pp. 49–76). Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dent, C. (2008). East Asian regionalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosch, J. (2010). Relations between China and Southeast Asia: A new regional order in the making? In L. Dittmer & G. T. Yu (Eds.), China, the developing world, and the new global dynamic (pp. 61–82). Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosch, J., & Hensengerth, O. (2006). Subregional cooperation in Southeast Asia: The Mekong Basin. European Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(2), 263–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economy, E. (2005). China’s rise in Southeast Asia: Implications for the United States. Journal of Contemporary China, 14(44), 409–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FMPRC – Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC (1997)..Speech by President Jiang Zemin at the 5th APEC Informal Leadership Meeting, 25 November 1997. http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjdt/zyjh/t24914.htm. Accessed 5 Jan 2011.

  • Gilpin, R. (1981). War and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godehard, N., & Nabers, D. (2011). Regional powers and regional orders. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goh, E. (2007). Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia. Analysing regional security strategies. International Security, 32(3), 13–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, X., & Li, M. (2009). Beibu Gulf: Emerging Sub-regional Integration between China and ASEAN. Working Paper, No. 168. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. http://www.rsis.edu.sg/publications/WorkingPapers/WP168.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2011.

  • Hosokawa, D. (2009). Pan Bei Bu Gulf Economic Cooperation: China’s new cooperation initiative in cooperation with ASEAN. Osaka Kaida Ronshu, 60(2), 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, A. (2004). Hegemony and regional governance in the Americas. Global Law Working Paper, No. 05/04. New York: NYU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990). Socialisation and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44(3), 283–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF (International Monetary Fund) (2009). Direction of Trade Statistics, Washington D.C.: IMF Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Times, 14 July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, D. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security, 27(4), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1989). The theory of hegemonic stability and change in international economic regimes, 1967–1977. In R. Keohane (Ed.), International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory (pp. 74–100). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraser, S. (1985). Structural conflict: The third world against global liberalism. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, S. C. Y. (2006). China’s changing political economy with Southeast Asia: Starting a new page of Accord. Asian Perspective, 30(4), 113–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kugler, J., & Lemke, D. (2000). The power transition research program. In M. Midlarsky (Ed.), Handbook of war studies (2nd ed., pp. 129–163). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurlantzick, J. (2007). Charm offensive: How China’s soft power is transforming the world. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, C. H. (2001). Yen Bloc. Toward economic integration in Asia. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, D. (2002). Regions of war and peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1994). Power, trade and war. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCartan, B. (2009). A helping Chinese hand: Trade and aid with Southeast Asia. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 22(May 25.) http://www.japanfocus.org/-B-McCartan/3153. Accessed 24 Oct 2012.

  • Organski, A. F. K. (1968). World politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organski, A. F. K., & Kugler, J. (1980). The war ledger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, D., & Ruiz Estrada, M. A. (2010). A New Multi-Dimensional Framework for Analyzing Regional Integration: Regional Integration Evaluation (RIE) Methodology. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, No. 49. Manila: ADB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. (2007). Balance of power politics and the rise of China: Accommodation and balancing in East Asia. In W. W. Keller & T. G. Rawski (Eds.), China’s rise and the balance of influence in Asia (pp. 121–145). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, D. (2005). Southeast Asia and China: balancing or Bandwagoning? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 27(2), 305–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russett, B., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence and international organization. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schüller, M., Brod, M., Neff D, Bünte, M. (2010). China’s Emergence within Southeast Asia’s Aid Architecture: New Kid on the Block?, conference paper presented at the AidData Conference on Aid Transparency and Developing Finance, University College, Oxford 22–25 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, D. (2005). China engages Asia. Reshaping the Regional Order. International Security, 29(3), 64–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, S. (2003). An ASEAN way to security cooperation in Southeast Asia? The Pacific Review, 16(2), 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siverson, R., & Miller, R. (1995). The power transition: Problems and prospects. In J. Kugler & D. Lemke (Eds.), Parity and war (pp. 57–73). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, S. (1983). Cave! Hic Dragones: A critique of regime analysis. In S. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes (pp. 337–354). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart-Fox, M. (2003). A short history of China and Southeast Asia: Tribute, trade and influence. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, R. (2008). China’s rise, Southeast Asia and the United States: Is a China-centered order marginalizing the United States? In E. Goh & S. Simon (Eds.), China, the United States and Southeast Asia. Contending perspectives on politics, security and economics (pp. 91–106). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (2000). On the via media. A response to the critics. Review of International Studies, 26(1), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wight, C. (2006). Agents, structures and international relations. Politics as ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (2008). Whose aid? Whose influence? China, emerging donors and the silent revolution in developmental assistance. International Affairs, 84(6), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. (1991). Political leadership and regime formation: On the development of institutions in international society. International Organization, 45(3), 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zan, J. (2004). China’s Peaceful Rise. Interview with Li Junri. http://China.org.cn/ english/2004/Apr/93730.htm,file. Accessed 3 July 2010.

  • Zhang, H. (2007). China’s aid to Southeast Asia. In S.-H. Saw (Ed.), ASEAN-China economic relations (pp. 250–268). Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Bünte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bünte, M. (2018). China’s Rising Power in Southeast Asia and Its Impact on Regional Institution-Building: Who Is Leading Whom?. In: Loewen, H., Zorob, A. (eds) Initiatives of Regional Integration in Asia in Comparative Perspective. United Nations University Series on Regionalism, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1211-6_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics