Skip to main content

Dynamic Rhythm and Static Rhythm: Polemics of Mondrian’s Theory of Rhythm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Mondrian's Philosophy of Visual Rhythm
  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

At the end of the nineteenth century, Etienne-Jules Marey and Eadweard Muybridge investigated the movement of the body in serialised form using new cinematographic techniques. These photographic experiments deeply influenced Euro-American avant-gard artists and thinkers of the early twentieth century, including the Cubists and Futurists, and artists such as Robert Delaunay, Frantisek Kupka, Marcel Duchamp, Theo van Doesburg and Thomas Eakins.

In art, time and movement are fixed; thus contemplation is easier.

– Piet Mondrian (Mondrian 1986, 323).

Remember the impression made by good architecture , that it expresses a thought. One would like to respond to it too with a gesture.

– Ludwig Wittgenstein (Wittgenstein et al. 1998, 26e).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gabo and Mondrian coincide in their criticism of Futurism and Cubism. However, where Cubism is concerned, the difference in their stance towards the theory of avant-garde art is pronounced. While Gabo vehemently repudiated Cubism’s chaotic compositional mode, Mondrian acknowledged its radicality and took its influence on his art in a more positive sense. Modrian was similary positive towards Impressionism and Futurism.

  2. 2.

    For the arguments about the difference between Pythagorean (Quininianus) and Aristoxenus, see Chap. 5.

  3. 3.

    S. K. Langer’s theory of ‘composition ’ and rhythm is discussed in detail in Chap. 5.

  4. 4.

    Here, I am referring to the Op Art of Bridget Riley’s and Victor de Vasarely’s painting, whose calculated control of the viewer’s optic nerve causes the effect of kinetic movement. These works can be contrasted with, for example, the later Josef Albers’ and Mark Rothko’s 1950s works, which engage the viewing subject’s volition.

  5. 5.

    Deleuze and Guattari summarized Mondrian’s idiosyncrasy as a painter in the similar way: “It could be said that Mondrian was a painter of thickness ” (Deleuze and Guattari 1994, 194).

  6. 6.

    An artist group associated with the publication of Circle: International Survey of Constructive Art, edited by J. L. Martin, Ben Nicholson and Naum Gabo, published in London in 1937, in which Mondrian published his seminal essay “Plastic Art and Pure Plastic Art”.

  7. 7.

    ‘Good Gestalt ’ is the psychological propensity to see forms and shapes within indiscernible configurations of tangled lines or other complexities, accompanied by the background-foreground, or locality-whole dichotomy (Wertheimer 1974, 71–88, Wulf 1974, 147).

  8. 8.

    Many an acquaintance of Mondrian comments on the humorous side of his character – his wit, bawdiness, and jokes. This is testified by Nally van Doesburg, Harry Holzman, J. J. P. Oud and others.

  9. 9.

    In his writing, Mondrian seems to have taken care to distance himself from this esoteric understanding of rhythm, in order that his thinking not be taken as mere arcane mysticism .

  10. 10.

    Harbert Read was an internationally acclaimed art critic in the 1940–50s. He was an acquaintance of Mondrian’s especially during the latter’s evacuation to England in 1938–39 (Burstow 1997).

  11. 11.

    There are earlier examples of Mondrian’s work , which pronounced more ostensive visual movement and repetition , before his neoplastic period (1918–1944); for example, Pier and Ocean (or Plus-Minus) Series (1914-16), Composition in Colour A (1916). However, according to neoplastic doctrine, in which Mondrian denied the ‘naturalistic ’ treatment of repetitive and sequential rhythm, these canvases lack structure. The (rectangular ) shapes float on the surface against a vague background space, thus constituting a background-forground dichotomy which, in his neoplastic period, he vehemently denied.

  12. 12.

    The sixth item in General Principles of Neo-Plasticism (Mondrian 1986, 214).

  13. 13.

    “Vormbeelding” denotes the plastic form, and is translated by Holtzman and James as “morphoplastic” (Mondrian 1986, 394 n.5).

  14. 14.

    Mondrian made ‘black-and-white’ canvases in 1926 (one canvas), 1929 (one), 1930 (two), 1931 (one) and 1934 (one).

  15. 15.

    My thanks go to Harry Cooper who, in his feedback to my manuscript, pointed out that not all the black strips of neo-plastic canvases are varnished.

References

  • Apollonio, Umbro. 1973. Futurist Manifestos. The Documents of 20th Century Art. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, Rudolph. 1986. The Center Surviving Mondrian. The American Society for Aesthetics XLIV (3, Spring): 292–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blotkamp, Carel. 1994. Mondrian: The Art of Destruction. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bois, Yve-Alain, and Joop Joosten. 1994. Piet Mondrian: 1872–1944. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, Marta. 1992. Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstow, Robert. 1997. The Limit of Modernist Art as a ‘Weapon of the Cold War’: Reassessing the Unknown Patron of the Monment to the Unknown Political Prisoner. The Oxford Art Journal 20: 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? Trans. G. Burchell and H. Tomlinson. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchamp, Marcel. 1973. Salt Seller: The Writings of Marcel Duchamp (Marchard Du Sel). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenman, Peter. 1993. Re-working Eisenman. London/Berlin: Academy Editions; Ernst & Sohn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Edmund Burke. 1992. Varieties of Visual Experience. New York: Harry N. Abrams Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabo, Naum. 1937. Sculpture: Carving and Construction in Space. In Circle: International Survey of Constructive Art, ed. J.L. Martin, Ben Nicholson, and Naum Gabo. London: Faber and Faber Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1966. Reminiscences of Mondrian. Studio International, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. The Tradition of Constructivism. Boston: A Da Capo Paperback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabo, Naum, Herbert Edward Read, and Leslie Martin. 1957. Gabo: Constructions, Sculpture, Paintings, Drawings, Engravings. London: Lund Humphries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1956. The Philosophy of History. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosten, Joop M. 1998. Piet Mondrian, Catalogue Raisonné II: Catalogue Raisonné of the Work of 1911–1944. Blaricum: V+ K Publishing/Inmerc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandinsky, Wassily, Franz Marc, and Klaus Lankheit. 1974. The Blaue Reiter Almanac. New documentary ed, Documents of 20th-century art. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandinsky, Wassily, Kenneth Clement Lindsay, and Peter Vergo. 1982. Kandinsky: Complete Writings on Art, Vol. 1 (1901–1921), 2 vols. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren, Howard Vincent Hong, Edna Hatlestad Hong, and Søren Kierkegaard. 1983. Fear and Trembling; Repetition, Kierkegaard’s Writings. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Philosophical Fragments, Johannes Climacus, Kierkegaard’s Writings. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C. Smith. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondrian, Piet. 1969. Two Mondrian Sketchbooks 1912–1914. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff International nv.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. The New Art – The New Life: The Collected Writings of Piet Mondrian. Trans. H. Holtzman and M.S. James. Boston: G. K. Hall and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, Herbert Edward. 1951. The Philosophy of Modern Art: Collected Essays by Herbert Read. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Susan Barnes. 1981. Giacomo Balla: Divisionism and Futurism 1871–1912. Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1963 (1961). The Unprivileged Painter: Lapoujade. Essays in Aesthetics. London: Peter Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, R. Murray. 1986. The Thinking Ear: Complete Writings on Music Education. Toronto: Arcana Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheimer, Max. 1974. Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms. In A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, ed. Willis D. Ellis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1977. Remarks on Colour. Trans. L.L. McAlister and M. Schättle. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, G.H. von Wright, Heikki Nyman, and Alois Pichler. 1998. Culture and Value: A Selection from the Posthumous Remains, Rev. 2nd ed. Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wulf, Friedrich. 1974. Tendencies in Figural Variation. In A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, ed. Willis D. Ellis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tosaki, E. (2017). Dynamic Rhythm and Static Rhythm: Polemics of Mondrian’s Theory of Rhythm. In: Mondrian's Philosophy of Visual Rhythm. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1198-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics