Results of Acoustic Research in the CM Deploying Areas

  • Zygmunt KlusekEmail author
  • Miłosz Grabowski
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security book series (NAPSC)


Short overview of problems connected with acoustic detection and recognition of chemical munition deployed in the Baltic Sea after the II WWW is demonstrated.

Results of 36 high-frequency acoustic scanning missions carried out with the IVER-2 AUV over a chemical munition dumpsite in the Bornholm Basin, Gdansk Deep, Little Belt and south-western part of Gotland Deep are presented. The main goal of the investigations was to image structure of the dumpsite and to positioning targets for purposes of taking probes of environment for further chemical analysis.

The data support of the earlier findings wide variety of types of objects at the sea bottom – both historical items as wracks or sea mines and contemporary litter.

It is generally observed a low contrast between acoustic shadows and backscattered signals, which are likely due to the sediments properties in the Baltic Deeps.

In the Bornholm Basin and Gdansk Deep the distribution of the buried objects seems to be rather concentrated around surrounded by diffusive spacing of objects due to fishery activity in the areas. The results of complementary studies on the acoustic properties of the bottom demonstrate the dependency of probability of findings with the type of sediments.

Finally some aspects of probability to detect of is given.


  1. Badiey M, Mu Y, Simmen JA, Forsythe SE (2000) Signal variability in shallow-water sound channels. IEEE J Ocean Eng 25(4):492–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blondel P, Murton BJ (1997) Handbook of seafloor sonar imagery. Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, p 314Google Scholar
  3. Blondel P (2009) The handbook of Sidescan sonar. Springer et Praxis Publishing, Berlin et Chichester, p 316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulczak AI, Rak D, Schmidt B, Beldowski J (2016) Observations of near-bottom currents in Bornholm Basin, Slupsk Furrow and Gdansk Deep. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 128:96–113Google Scholar
  5. Fleming BW (1976) Side Scan Sonar: A Practical Guide. Int Hydrogr Rev 1 III(1):65–92Google Scholar
  6. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I (1973) Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-3:610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson DR, Winebrener DP, Ishimaru A (1986) Application of the composite roughness model to high-frequency bottom backscattering. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1410–1422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Klusek Z, Tegowski J, Szczucka J, Śliwinski A (1994) Characteristic properties of bottom backscattering in the southern Baltic Sea at ultrasound frequencies. Oceanologia 36(1):81–102Google Scholar
  9. Missiaen T, Söderström M, Popescu I, Vanninen P (2010) Evaluation of a chemical munition dumpsite in the Baltic Sea based on geophysical and chemical investigations. Sci Total Environ 408:3536–3553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tesei AWLJF, Maguer A, Løvik A (2000) Target parameter estimation using resonance scattering analysis applied to air-filled, cylindrical shells in water. J Acoust Soc Am 108:2891–2900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Tesei A, Maguer A, Fox WLJ, Lim R, Schmidt H (2002) Measurements and modelling of acoustic scattering from partially and completely buried spherical shells. J Acoust Soc Am 112:1817–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Williams KL, Grochocinski JM, Jackson DR (2001) Interface scattering by poroelastic seafloors: first-order theory. J Acoust Soc Am 110:2956–2963CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of SciencesSopotPoland

Personalised recommendations