Skip to main content

The Ongoing Dynamics of Integrating Sustainability into Business Practice: The Case of Novo Nordisk A/S

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Managing Sustainable Business

Abstract

This study raises the question of how managers can adopt appropriate management control systems to communicate to employees and other stakeholders what behavior is desired, and how they can work to ensure that their corporate sustainability claims are implemented at the operational level. That is, how can organizations demonstrate that their sustainability declarations are not just “good looks”. Specifically, the study unfolds Novo Nordisk’s long-term commitment to sustainable practices and the company’s validation of these practices by focusing on how issues of sustainability have been integrated and cascaded throughout the entire organisation via the company’s “Way of Management”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Novo Nordisk, “Take Action. Make the Triple Bottom Line Your Business”, May, 2003, p. 2.

  2. 2.

    Elkington, J. “Cannibals With Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business”, Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd., 1999, p. 161.

  3. 3.

    World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future, 1987.

  4. 4.

    ACCA and CorporateRegister.com, “Towards transparency: progress on global sustainability reporting 2004”, p. 8.

  5. 5.

    Crook, C., “A survey of corporate social responsibility”, The Economist, January 22nd, 2005, p. 2.

  6. 6.

    Novo Nordisk A/S, Annual Report 2004, pp. 49, 60 and 98.

  7. 7.

    Sources: Novo Nordisk A/S, Annual Report 2004, p. 38 and Thompson Financial Datastream.

  8. 8.

    Novo Nordisk A/S, Annual Report 2004, p. 108.

  9. 9.

    For more than 30 years it has been mandatory to have employees represented at the board of directors in Danish companies, see for example: Rose, C., “Medarbejderrepræsentation i danske bestyrelser”. Center for Kreditret- og Kapitalmarkedsret, Copenhagen Business School Press, 2004, p. 21–32.

  10. 10.

    Novo Nordisk A/S, Annual Report 2004, p. 18.

  11. 11.

    For example: “This is Mads Øvlisen, the former CEO of Novo Nordisk and one of the most admired individuals in Danish business. As he retired in 2000 after 19 years as chief executive officer in Novo Nordisk, he had increased the number of employees from 4.000 to 15.000. He has won prizes for his management style of trustworthiness, and he has made Novo Nordisk synonymous with corporate social responsibility. But he has remained the approachable Mads with tucked-up sleeves. Øvlisen is a success, a living legend, a walking lump of gold”, Euroman, March 2005, p. 46.

  12. 12.

    Novo Nordisk, Annual Report 2003, p. 2.

  13. 13.

    Corporate Stakeholder Relations’ Strategic Plan 2004–05, March 2004, slide 2.

  14. 14.

    See Novo Nordisk History, p.15; available at: http://www.novonordisk.com/about_us/history/milestones_in_nn_history.asp

  15. 15.

    Source: Corporate Stakeholder Relations Strategic Plan 2004–05, March 2004, p. 15.

  16. 16.

    Ibid, p. 13.

  17. 17.

    Quote from CEO Henrik Gürtler, Novo A/S, June 2, 2005

  18. 18.

    “Novo Nordisk Way of Management: a short interpretation guide to the fundamentals”, preface, 1997.

  19. 19.

    Novo Nordisk: “The facilitation process: charter of standards, procedures and guidelines”, 1998.

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    These reports are available at http://www.novonordisk.com/sustainability/sustainability_in_short

  22. 22.

    For further accolades, refer to http://www.novonordisk.com/sustainability/news

  23. 23.

    Berlingske Nyhedsmagasin, no. 13, April 29.-June 13, 2005, p. 28.

  24. 24.

    ISO 14001 is an environmental management standard with auditing tools and procedures.

  25. 25.

    Quote from Susanne Stormer, June 19, 2005

  26. 26.

    Corporate Stakeholder Relations’ Strategic Plan 2004–05, March 2004, p. 13.

  27. 27.

    Source: information supplied by Eric Drapé.

  28. 28.

    Please note that the corporate balanced score card is not printed in the case. The balanced scorecard from Operations, Product Supply and Diabetes Finished Products are presented in Appendix 7.

  29. 29.

    eVoice was an annual survey which asks a minimum of 48 questions around eight mandatory themes (Vision and Values, Development of employees, Employee engagement, Equal Opportunity, Stress and workload, Quality mindset, Performance orientation, and Internationalisation). In addition, each unit and project group could include up to an additional 72 questions from 12 themes (Customer orientations, Winning culture, Working climate, Empowerment, Cooperation across functions, Communication, Innovation, Planning and execution, Working conditions, Novo Nordisk policies, Best Practice, and Reporting).

  30. 30.

    Interview with Eric Drapé on October 26, 2004.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely want to thank Novo Nordisk A/S for inviting us to collect data and for checking facts and figures for this case study. From Novo Nordisk we also want to thank Lito Valencia, business analyst in Finance and Business Integration, Hanne Schou-Rode, VP of Knowledge, IT & Quality in Corporate Stakeholder Relations, and Eric Drapé, SVP in Diabetes Finished Products for their time and constructive reflections. And we appreciate the valuable input to the case from professor Niels Mygind, Copenhagen Business School, Stephanie Robertson, Lene Hougaard Pedersen, Henrik Nielsen, research assistant at Copenhagen Business School, and Henrik Melgaard. Finally, we gratefully acknowledge financial support from Copenhagen Business School, London Business School and the Academy of Business in Society (ABIS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mette Morsing .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1: Novo Nordisk A/S Organisational Structure 2005

An organizational chart presents the names of the president and C E O top of the hierarchy. 5 designations are at the next level, namely, R and D, quality regulatory and business development, finance, operation, and corporate stakeholder relations.

Appendix 2: Selected Financial Information

Panel A: Financial Statement Information (in DKK million)a

 

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Sales

20,485

23,385

24,866

26,158

29,031

Operating profit

4703

5410

5927

6422

6980

Net profit

3154

3620

4116

4833

5013

Total assets

24,597

28,662

31,612

34,564

37,433

Total current liabilities

5860

6138

6152

7032

7280

Total long-term liabilities

2117

2824

2983

2756

3649

Equity

16,620

19,700

22,477

24,776

26,504

R&D/sales

16.6%

16.6%

15.9%

15.5%

15.0%

Net profit margin

15.4%

15.5%

16.6%

18.5%

17.3%

Return on invested capital

22.3%

22.7%

20.5%

19.5%

20.6%

Panel B: Share Return Informationb

Company

Country

Current

5 Year

Astrazeneca

U.K.

−11.47%

−3.99%

Glaxosmithkline

U.K.

16.48%

−22.78%

Novartis ‘R’

Switzerland

2.16%

9.08%

Novo Nordisk ‘B’

Denmark

−1.55%

44.17%

Roche holdings ‘B’

Switzerland

−11.29%

−11.82%

Sanofie-Aventis

France

32.65%

80.82%

Schering

Germany

18.89%

7.08%

Shire pharmaceuticals

U.K.

5.87%

−39.68%

UCB

Belgium

13.74%

9.71%

Danish market (KFX)

 

23.14%

17.77%

  1. aSource: Novo Nordisk A/S – Annual Report 2004; Net profit margin equals net profit as a percentage of sales; Return on invested capital equals operating profit after tax (using the effective tax rate) as a percentage of average inventories, receivables, property, plant and equipment and as well as intangible assets less non-interest bearing liabilities including provisions (the sum of above assets and liabilities at the beginning of the year and at year-end divided by two).
  2. bSource: Thompson Financial Datastream; the current return is calculated over the period May 1, 2004 – April 30, 2005 and the 5 Year return is calculated over the period May 1, 2000 – April 30, 2005.

Appendix 3: Novo Nordisk’s Vision, Values, Commitments and Fundamentals

The Vision

We want to be the world’s leader in diabetes treatment

We offer products and services in other areas where we can make a difference

We deliver competitive business results

A job with us is more than “just a job”

Our values are reflected in our actions

Our history shows that it can be done

The Values are six corporate values to guide decision-making and action: accountable, ambitious, responsible, engaged with stakeholders, open and honest, ready for change.

The Commitments are a reflection of the commitment to sustainability and to integrating the Triple Bottom Line thinking in organisational practices.

The Fundamentals consist of ten behavioural guidelines on how to organize and behave in everyday organisational life in all units at all levels in Novo Nordisk:

  1. 1.

    Each unit must share and use better practices.

  2. 2.

    Each unit must have a clear definition of where accountabilities and decision powers recide

  3. 3.

    Each unit must have an action plan to ensure improvement of its busienss and performance and working climate

  4. 4.

    Every team and employee must have updated business and competency targets and receive timely feedback on performance against these targest

  5. 5.

    Each unit must have an action plan to ensure the development of teams and individuals based on busienss requirements and employee input.

  6. 6.

    Every manager must establish and maintain procedures in the unit for living up to relevant laws, regulations, and Novo Nordisk policies

  7. 7.

    Each unit and employee must know how they create value for their customers

  8. 8.

    Every manager requring reporting from others must explain the actual use of the report and the added value

  9. 9.

    Every manager must continuously make it easier for the employees to liberate energy for customer related issues.

  10. 10.

    Every manager and unit must actively support cross-unit projects and working relationships of relevance to the business

Source: http://www.novonordisk.com/about_us/about_novo_nordisk/the_charter.asp

Appendix 4: Example of a Facilitation

Following are excerpts from a recent facilitation at Diabetes Pharmaceutical Site Hillerød:

Facilitation Start Date:

15 November 2004

Facilitation End Date:

22 December 2004

Purpose and Scope of Facilitation

The purpose and scope of the facilitation is to assess the state of compliance, within Pharmaceutical Diabetes Site Hillerød, with the Novo Nordisk Way of Management, excluding Financial Commitments, and to agree and follow up on actions resulting from the facilitation and to report the results.

At the time of the facilitation the organisation is influenced by a number of changes. The unit VP and the QA (quality assurance) VP were appointed in the Q4 2004 and several department managers have been appointed to their current position within 2004.

Executive Summary

The facilitation of DPSH in Site Hillerød has shown a unit dedicated to live up to the targets and challenges set by Diabetes Finished Products (DFP). All interviewees were aware of Novo Nordisk Way of management and feel that the unit and management are living up to the values of Novo Nordisk. Facilitations show that there are different levels of compliance amongst the departments with respect to the implementation of Fundamentals.

The unit is highly focused on achieving its business targets, sometimes at the expense of overlooking the quality of some of the management processes such as APIS and development planning.

DPSH is currently developing its own strategy in alignment with DFP strategy and business plans. There is a clear understanding by all in the unit that focus must be on supporting the needs defined in the production agreements. Roll out of cLEAN™ is at variable stages within the different functions within DPSH.

Target setting based on the DPSH Balanced Scorecard and follow up needs to be improved for both teams and individuals. The lack of specific targets in some teams also influences the frequency and quality of feedback given in the organisation and needs to be enhanced.

DPSH is as an organisation in close daily contact with its key stakeholders within Novo Nordisk and interviewees are aware of their customers needs.

Source: internal document provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products.

Appendix 5: Indicators of Triple Bottom Line Performance

Strategic area

Indicators

Impact

Living our values

Two indicators show how we live up to the company’s values, as perceived by employees. This is measured as part of the climate survey, eVoice, conducted annualy. One indicator showws follow-up on the facilitation process.

Average of respondents’ answers as to whether social and environmental issues are important for the future of the company.

Organisational support for and understanding of responsible business practices.

Average of respondents’ answers as to whether management demonstrates in words and action that they live up to our values.

Integration of corporate values in all decisions.

Percent of fulfilment of action points planned arising from facilitations of the Novo Nordisk way of management and values

Corrective actions on values following facilitations.

Access to health

Two indicators measure progress on one of the programmes for global access to health, the best possible pricing scheme in least developed countries (LDCs). In 2004 there were 50 LDCs.

Number of LDCs where Novo Nordisk operates.

Access to essential medicines.

Number of LDCs which have chosen to buy insulin under the best possible pricing scheme.

Affordability of essential medicines.

Our employees

Four indicators measure standards of health and safety in the workplace, employee development and equal opportunities.

Frequency of occupational injuries.

Increased quality of life for employees, improved work flow and productivity, and less absence due to illness.

Employee turnover rate.

Influx and outflux of knowledge.

Average of respondents’ answers as to whether their work gives them an opportunity to use and develop their competences/skills.

Increased competence level for employees and increase competence capital in the company.

Average of respondents’ answers as to whether people from diverse backgrounds have equal opportunities (for example in terms of hiring, promotion and training) at Novo Nordisk, regardless of gender, race, ways of thinking etc.

Increased diversity in the workplace.

Our use of animals

Two indicators track efforts to reduce the number of experimental animals and improve their welfare.

Percent of animal test types removed from external and internal specification.

Reduction and replacement of experimental animals.

Housing conditions for experimental animals, considering the needs of the animals.

Improved welfare of experimental animals.

Eco-efficiency and compliance

Two environmental indicators, eco-productivity indices (EPIs), are based on eco-effeciciency thinking and reflect internationally adopted views. Full compliance with local laws and regulations is a company policy. Certification of production facilities is instrumental to that end.

Annual improvement in water efficiency.

Water use efficiency.

Annual improvement in energy efficiency.

Energy use efficiency.

Compliance.

Compliance with regulatory requirements.

ISO 14001 implementation.

Accidental releases.

Pollution prevention through decreased use of raw materials, water and energy and decreased environmental impact per produced unit.

Economic contribution

Five financial measures for reporting to shareholders and the financial markets serve as indicators for economic contribution.

Operating profit margin.

Contribution to company efficiency, growth and investors’ economic capacity.

Growth in operating profit.

Contribution to company growth and investors’ economic capacity.

Total corporate taxe as share of sales.

Contribution to national economic capacity.

Return on invested capital.

Efficiency of invested capital, contribution to asset base, and investors’ economic capacity.

Cash to earnings (3-year average).

Contribution to the company’s degree of freedom in terms of available cash funds (resources).

  1. Source: Novo Nordisk A/S Annual Report 2004

Appendix 6: Diabetes Finished Products – Organisational Chart

An organizational chart presents the names of the destinations for the Diabetes Finished Products, with S V P at the top of the hierarchy. An executive assistant, 2 V Ps, and a personal assistant make up the next level. The last level consists of 5 V Ps in different locations.

Source: internal document provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products

Appendix 7: Cascading of Balanced Scorecard 2005 – Ensure Environmental, Social and Ethical Performance

 

Operations

Product supply

Diabetes finished products

KPI

1. EPI performance

1. EPI performance

1. EPI performance

2. CO2 emission reduction target

2. CO2 emissions reduction strategy and action plan.

3. CO2 emission reduction target.

KPI definition

1. EPI is calculated as the relation between the total yield of product to the respective consumption of water and energy. Performance is tracked annually against previous year.

1. EPI is calculated as the relation between the total yield of product to the respective consumption of water and energy.

1. EPI is calculated as the relation between the total yield of product to the respective consumption of water and energy. Performance is tracked quarterly against previous year. Simple average of the two index is the target.

2. CO2 emission reduction target to be approved by Environment & Bioethics Committee and communicated to relevant stakeholders

2. A CO2-compliance plan for Bagsvaerd and Hillerod to be drafted and implemented.

3. Establish an implementation plan for the CO2 strategy with base year 2004.

Target 2005

1. Increase the eco-productivity index for water in the period 2001–2005 by an annual average of 5% corresponding to a total increase in EPI of 30% end of 2005. Increase the eco-productivity index for energy in the period 2001–2005 by an annual average of 4% corresponding to a total increase in EPI of 25% end 2005.

1. Increase the eco-productivity index for water in the period 2001–2005 by an annual average of 5% corresponding to a total increase in EPI of 30% end of 2005. Increase the eco-productivity index for energy in the period 2001–2005 by an annual average of 4% corresponding to a total increase in EPI of 25% end 2005.

1. 2005: Water: 101 energy: 99

2. S&R to set target.

2. CO2-complaince plan approved by PS management. Information seminar for key internal stake-holders to ensure effective implementation of the CO2 strategy.

3. Include the CO reduction target in PS BSC06.

  1. Source: internal documents provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products

Appendix 8: Cascading of Balanced Scorecard 2005 – Support Diversity

 

Operations

Product supply

Diabetes finished products

KPI

1. Equal opportunity implementation.

1. Equal opportunity implementation.

1. Equal opportunity implementation.

2. Number of EVPs/SVPs that have evaluated progress achieved according to plan as part of the OA process.

2. Number of employees that have evaluated progress achieved according to plan as part of the OA process.

2. Number of employees that have evaluated progress achieved according to plan as part of the OA process.

3. JTC (job transfer Centre) process is running smoothly.

3. JTC process is running smoothly.

KPI definition

1. Action plans for 2005 achieved.

1. % of targets in the action plans for 2005 achieved.

1. % of targets in the action plans for 2005 achieved.

2. EVPs/SVPs have evaluated progress.

2. % of EVPs/SVPs that have evaluated progress.

2. Progress evaluated.

3. The KPI measures: A) JTC’s ability to send the right people to the right job; B) the interviewers acceptance of these candidates.

3. The KPI measures: A) JTC’s ability to send the right people to the right job; B) the interviewers acceptance of these candidates.

Target 2005

1. % of targets in the action plans for 2005 achieved; red <80%, yellow 80%, green >80%.

1. 80%

1. Target > = 80%

2. % of EVPs/SVPs have evaluated progress according to plan from OA (combined SVPs); red <95%, yellow 95% – 99%; green 100%

2. 100%

2. Target = 100%; evaluation done according to templates from corporate responsibility management.

3. When JTC has relevant candidates for vacant positions, 90% of those vacant positions must be filled by a JTC candidate.

3. When JTC has relevant candidates for vacant positions, 90% of those vacant positions must be filled by a JTC candidate.

  1. Source: internal documents provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products.

Appendix 9: Cascading of Balanced Scorecard 2005 – Ensure Talent Development

 

Operations

Product supply

Diabetes finished products

KPI

1. Utilisation of talent pools – % of VP positions filled from talent pools.

1. Utilisation of talent pools – % of VP positions filled from talent pools.

1. Utilisation of talent pools – % of VP positions filled from talent pools.

2. Employee perception of development based on eVoice survey (development theme).

2. Employee perception of development based on eVoice

2. Employee perception of development based on eVoice

KPI definition

1. VP positions (new or vacant) filled from talent pools.

1. VP positions (new or vacant) filled from talent pools.

1. VP positions (new or vacant) filled from talent pools.

2. Percentage of units score.

2. Units to score an average of > = 3.0 on the mandatory eVoice theme “development of people”.

2. Percentage of units score 3.0 or above 0 on the mandatory eVoice theme “development of people”.

Target 2005

1. % VPs filled from talent pools. Red <55%, yellow 55%–60%, green >60%.

1. 60%

1. Target > = 60%

2. 85%

2. Target = 85%

  1. Source: internal documents provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products

Appendix 10: Diabetes Finished Products – 2005 Balanced Scorecard

CSF

CSF – Rationale

KPI

Finance

Realise growth in operating profit

Secure industry competitive growth

Operating profit

Ensure competitive ROIC – Working capital and investments

Ensure industry competitive return on invested capital

Inventory

Investments

Ensure investment management

Investments

Business processes

Improve productivity in DFP

Secure cost efficiency in production

Output vs. cost (unit costs)

Approval of batch records

Reduction in number of NCs

Quality cost

COGS

Timely and efficient execution of investment portfolio

Critical to increase production capacity in future demand and to improve productivity

Progress on major investments projects

Ensure successful implementation of IT projects

Successful implementation and use of IT

IT project milestones

Improve quality management focus in all business processes

Quality issues and documentation will be subject to increasing attention from both customers and authorities

% of non-conformity reports approved

Audit NC timeliness

Inspection readiness

QAP

Recalls

People & organisation

Increase internationalisation

Support the globalisation of Novo Nordisk

Internationalisation initiatives carried out

Support diversity/social responsibility

Enhance and promote innovation, attraction and reputation

Equal opportunity implementation

Evaluated progress achieved

JTC process is running smoothly

Ensure talent development

To ensure specialist and leadership capabilities that will support and drive growth

Utilisation of talent pools

Employee perception of development

Ensure performance management

Improve individual performance and alignment with overall business goals

Implement uniform global performance management system

All units with absence due to illness >5% have to decrease this absence

Absence due to illness

Customers & society

Ensure superior customer satisfaction – Improve production quality

Product quality is a critical parameter for achieving customer satisfaction

Customer complaint

Ensure environmental, social and ethical performance

Help the organisation to ensure social, environmental, social and bioethical performance

EPI performance

Ensure timely and efficiently delivery to market

In order to be the world’s leading diabetes care company we have to have products ready to meet customer demands

Affiliate inventory level

Levemir® finished product production

Launch of Levemir®

  1. Source: internal document provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products

Appendix 11: Performance Index 2005 – for Eric Drapé

 

Diabetes finished products

 

Weights

YTD Dec 2005 results

Weighted

Target

Expected

Index

Perf.

Perf. +/−

Finance

40.0

    

40.0

0.0

Investments

 

15.0

1762

1762

100

15.0

Operating costs*

25.0

2539

2539

100

25.0

Customers

30.0

    

30.0

0.0

Stock outs

 

5.0

10

10

100

5.0

EPI performance

5.0

100

100

100

5.0

Production output**

       

3ml Penfill, fill

 

10.0

345

345

100

10.0

disposables pack (NL,FP,IL)

 

5.0

164

164

100

5.0

vials pack

 

5.0

102

102

100

5.0

Processes

20.0

    

20.0

0.0

NN248 timeliness***

 

2.5

100

100

100

2.5

 

Unit cost

2.5

100

100

100

2.5

Number of actual recalls

5.0

4

4

100

5.0

FDA Inspection readiness

2.5

100

100

100

2.5

 

QAP

2.5

80%

80%

100

2.5

COGS20, volume/fte

5.0

100

100

100

5.0

People & Organisation

10.0

    

10.0

0.0

Decrease in absence

 

5.0

10

10

100

5.0

JTC

5.0

90

90

100

5.0

Total

 

100.0

   

100.0

0.0

  1. Source: internal document provided by Eric Drapé, SVP Diabetes Finished Products
  2. *Operating profit target is AB05 plus logbooks and approved target corrections
  3. **Target to be corrected downwards if reduced demand in local markets create excess capacity
  4. ***Final product specification. Target is August. If target is reached in September = index 66,6, October = index 33,3, November or later = index 0. If target is reached in July = index 133,3, June = index 166,6, and May or sonner index 200

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morsing, M., Oswald, D., Stormer, S. (2019). The Ongoing Dynamics of Integrating Sustainability into Business Practice: The Case of Novo Nordisk A/S. In: Lenssen, G.G., Smith, N.C. (eds) Managing Sustainable Business. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics