Skip to main content

Integrative Education Model for Resources and Critical Infrastructure Protection Based on Risk Assessment, Resources Valorization and Threat Ranking

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1970 Accesses

Abstract

Efficient and effective resource protection from the perspective of society usually involves minimizing costs and capital commitment in any way, while maximizing the percentage of resource utilization. Effective resource management from the perspective of the environment means leaving them in their natural, intact, state. On the other hand, effective and efficient resource protection management activities from the perspective of the army involve efficient resource protection measures during peacetime, emergencies, and even wartime. The aim of this paper is to help develop an adaptive, integrative education model for resource protection, addressing the contemporary needs both within the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and Ministry of environmental protection (MEP) of the Republic of Serbia. The paper offers an in-depth analysis of related core terms: improvement of the current approach to the subject area, nature of the resources that are subject to protection, and different modalities of protection. The applied methodology consists of comparative analysis, statistical methods, and multi-criteria evaluation and assessment. Core determinants (ranking) within the defined model are specified by means of expert judgments method. Obtained results are intended to be used in further implementation processes regarding the developed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baker D, Bridges D, Hunter R, Johnson G, Krupa J, Murphy J, Sorenson K (2002) Guidebook to decision-making methods. WSRC-IM-2002-00002, Department of Energy, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciurean RL, Schroter D, Glade T (2013) Conceptual frameworks of vulnerability assessments for natural disasters reduction, approaches to disaster management – examining the implications of hazards, emergencies and disasters. In: Prof. Tiefenbacher John (ed), InTech. doi:10.5772/55538

  • EC (2005) Green paper: on a European programme for critical infrastructure protection. Comission of the European Communities. Brussels (Belgium).

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2006) Commission of the European Communities from the commission on the European programme for critical infrastructure protection, COM (2006) 786, Final, Brussels (Belgium).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grozdanovic M, Janackovic G, Stojiljkovic E (2016) The selection of the key ergonomic indicators influencing work efficiency in the railway control rooms. Trans Inst Meas Control 38(10). doi:10.1177/0142331215579948

  • Haake J (2000) Firm strategies for an environmentally friendly use of materials: an application of the dematerialization concept to the environmental management of industrial firms. Dissertation. Universite de Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Centre d Economie et d Ethique pour Environnement et le Development (C3ED)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janackovic G, Savic S, Stankovic M (2013) Selection and ranking of occupational safety indicators based on fuzzy AHP: Case study in road construction companies. S Afr J Ind Eng 24(3). doi:10.7166/24-3-463

  • Janackovic G, Malenovic NJ, Vasovic D (2014) Effects of mining and thermal power plants and the key aspects of environmental quality ranking by AHP. Commun Depend Qual Manag 17(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjic A, Savic S, Janackovic G, Stankovic M, Velimirovic L (2016) Multi-criteria assessment of the smart grid efficiency using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process, Facta Universitatis. Series: Electron Energ 29(4). doi:10.2298/FUEE1604631J

  • Law on Defence, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 116/2007 and 88/2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Law on Emergency Situations, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 111/2009 and 92/2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Moberg E (2014) Multi-criteria decision analysis: environmental applications and case studies. CRC Press/Tailor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Malenovic Nikolic J, Ristovic I, Vasovic D (2015) System modelling for environmental management of mining and energy complex based on the strategy principles of sustainable balanced scorecard method (SBSC). J Environ Prot Ecol 16(3):1082–1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Malenovic Nikolic J, Vasovic D, Filipovic I, Musicki S, Ristovic I (2016a) Application of Project Management process on environmental management system improvement in mining-energy complexes. Energies 9(12):1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malenovic Nikolic J, Vasovic D, Janackovic G, Ilic Petkovic A, Ilic Krstic I (2016b) Improvement of mining and energy complexes based on risk assessment, environmental law and sustainable development principles, J Environ Prot Ecol 17(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Musicki S, Kljajevic L, Milanovic M, Cebela M, Milanovic S, Nenadovic S, Nenadovic M (2015) Predicting of lead distribution and immobilization in soil of the region of lignite mining (Rudovci, Serbia). Acta Montanistica Slovaka 20(3):192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Musicki M, Nikolic V, Vasovic D (2016) Resource protection – the Serbian Army experience. VI International symposium engineering management and competitiveness (EMC 2016), Kotor, Montenegro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic V, Vasovic D (2015) Tailor made education: environmental vs. energy security and sustainable development paradigm. In: Denis Caleta, Vesela Radovic (eds) Comprehensive approach as “Sine qua non for critical infrastructure protection & managing terrorism threats to critical infrastructure challenges for South Eastern Europe”. IOS Press, Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, NATO SPS Series D: Information and Communication Security

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolic V, Zivkovic N (2010) Occupational and environmental safety, emergencies and education Faculty of Occupational Safety, University of Nis, Nis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidential directive PDD-63 (1998) Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1978) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 1:1–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic Z (2012) Comparison of different multicriteria methods in selecting optimal biomechanical model parameters. ZAMM J Appl Math Mech 92(2):105–112

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic Z, Cvjeticanin L (2012) Identifying nonlinear biomechanical models by multicriteria analysis. J Sound Vib 331(5):1207–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Environmental Command (2007) U.S. Army Commander’s Guide for Mission-Focused Environmental Management Systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Ustinovichius L, Zavadskas EK, Podvezko V (2007) Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction. Control Cybern 36(1):251

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Vasovic D, Malenovic Nikolic J, Janackovic G (2016) Evaluation and assessment model for environmental management under the Seveso III, IPPC/IED and water framework directive. J Environ Prot Ecol 17(1):356–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusta JM, Correa GJ, Lacal-Arantegui R (2011) Methodologies and applications for critical infrastructure protection: state-of-the-art. Energ Policy 39:6100–6119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The presented research is a part of the projects Development of new information and communication technologies, based on advances mathematical methods, with applications in medicine, telecommunications, power systems, protection of natural heritage and education (Project code III 44006) and Research and development of energy efficient and environment friendly polygeneration systems based on renewable energy sources utilization (Project n III 42006), under the auspices of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dejan Vasovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vasovic, D., Janackovic, G.L., Musicki, S. (2017). Integrative Education Model for Resources and Critical Infrastructure Protection Based on Risk Assessment, Resources Valorization and Threat Ranking. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Resilience and Risk. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1122-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1123-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics