Skip to main content

An Introduction to Resilience for Critical Infrastructures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Resilience and Risk

Abstract

Wide ranging and uncertain threats to public health, energy networks, cybersecurity, and many other interconnected facets of infrastructure and human activity, are driving governments, including those of the United States, European Union and elsewhere to further efforts to bolster national resilience and security. Resilience offers the capability to better review how systems may continually adjust to changing information, relationships, goals, threats, and other factors in order to adapt in the face of change and uncertainty – particularly those potential changes that could yield negative outcomes. Specific to this need, fifty scholars and practitioners of risk and resilience analysis from some twenty countries met in Ponta Delgada in the Azores Islands from June 26 – 29, 2016 to discuss the challenges associated with the emerging science of resilience theory and applications. Sponsored and funded in part by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Science for Peace and Security Programme, the overall topic of this meeting was “Resilience-Based Approaches to Critical Infrastructure Safeguarding.” The workshop focused on ways in which military commanders and civilian decision makers alike could utilize resilience analysis in operations. More specifically, workshop discussion centered on both general resilience theory and analysis as well as various applications of resilience in topics ranging from cybersecurity to infrastructure resilience to ecosystem health. This chapter serves as a general introduction to the perspectives of various participants, as well as a reflection of discussion regarding how resilience thinking and analysis may be applied to critical infrastructure in various applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Suggested Readings

  • Allen CR, Angeler DG, Garmestani AS, Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2014) Panarchy: theory and application. Ecosystems 17:578–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR et al (2016) Quantifying spatial resilience. J Appl Ecol 53:625–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angeler DG, Allen CR (2016) Quantifying resilience. J Appl Ecol 53:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T (2011) On some recent definitions and analysis frameworks for risk, vulnerability, and resilience. Risk Anal 31(4):515–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Krohn BS (2014) A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barthel S, Sörlin S, Ljungkvist J (2010) The urban mind. In: Sinclair PJJ, Nordquist G , Herschend F, Isendahl C (eds) (Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden, http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:395721), pp 391–405

  • Baruth KE, Caroll JJ (2002) A formal assessment of resilience: the Baruth protective factors inventory. J Individ Psychol 58:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly EB, Allen CR, Hatfield K, Palma-Oliveira JM, Woods DD, Linkov I (2017) Features of resilience. Environ Syst Decis 37(1):46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Crichton MT, Ramsay CG, Kelly T (2009) Enhancing organizational resilience through emergency planning: learnings from cross-sectoral lessons. J Conting Crisis Manag 17:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL (2006) Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol Soc 11(20):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakos V, Scheffer M, van Nes EH, Brovkin V, Petoukhov V, Held H (2008) Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(38):14308–14312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fath BD, Dean CA, Katzmair H (2015) Navigating the adaptive cycle: an approach to managing the resilience of social systems. Ecol Soc 20. doi:10.5751/ES-07467-200224

  • Fekete A, Hufschmidt G, Kruse S (2014) Benefits and challenges of resilience and vulnerability for disaster risk management. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 5(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Barzel B, Barabási AL (2016) Universal resilience patterns in complex networks. Nature 530(7590):307–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Bellwood DR, Folke C, Steneck RS, Wilson J (2005) New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 20(7):380–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulett DT, Preston JY, CPA PMP (2000) Garbage in, garbage out? Collect better data for your risk assessment. In Proceedings of the Project Management Institute Annual Seminars & Symposium, pp 983–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP, Ryan PA, Etienne M, Allison HE, Elmqvist T, Walker BH (2006) Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects. Ecol Soc 11(1):20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov, I., Anklam, E., Collier, Z. A., DiMase, D., & Renn, O. (2014). Risk-based standards: integrating top–down and bottom–up approaches. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34(1), 134-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz B, Elmer F, Thieken AH (2009) Significance of high probability/low damage versus low probability/high damage flood events. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9(3):1033–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palma-Oliveira J, Trump B, Wood M, Linkov I (2017) The tragedy of the anticommons: a solutions for a “NIMBY” post-industrial world. Risk analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Seager TP, Rao PSC, Convertino M, Linkov I (2013) Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems. Risk Anal 33(3):356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance (2010) Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: A practitioner’s workbook Version 2.0 (available at http://www.resalliance.org/3871.php)

  • Scholz RW, Blumer YB, Brand FS (2012) Risk, vulnerability, robustness, and resilience from a decision-theoretic perspective. J Risk Res 15(3):313–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social – ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods D (2003) Creating foresight: how resilience engineering can transform NASA’s approach to risky decision making

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor Linkov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J.M. (2017). An Introduction to Resilience for Critical Infrastructures. In: Linkov, I., Palma-Oliveira, J. (eds) Resilience and Risk. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1123-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1122-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1123-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics