Abstract
AS WE have seen, Durkheim and others attempted to explain of how groups of humans come together as a collective. One of the most beautiful innovations of twentieth century physics was the ability to analyze such behavior with statistical methods and computational models. This has enabled researchers to quantify the specific aspects of a group of individuals that change as the individuals coalesce into a crowd. For the first time, a quantitative step could be taken toward answering the question when does a group become a separate individual in its own right?
Lordy, I hope there are tapes.
James Comey
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Rather ruefully, Reynolds pointed out that the computer scientist is not so lucky: computational modeling of flock behavior does indeed get significantly more difficult as the flock size is increased.
- 2.
See Brush (1967) for a history of the early days of this field and the development of the iconic Ising model.
- 3.
Vicsek et al. appear not to have been aware of the boids model at the time they submitted their 1995 paper. Toner and Tu (1995) noted that D. Rokhsar alerted them to Reynolds’s work. Following their citation, nearly all statistical physics studies of flocking cited Reynolds’s boids model as an important precursor.
- 4.
Giardina (2008) provides an excellent review summarizing the results of these and many other contributions to the field.
- 5.
Collective inhibition of locomotion is a process whereby cells, at least in vitro, change their direction of motion upon contact. It has some commonalities with the nematic collisions observed between microtubules (see below), and is impaired in malignant cells. See Mayor and Carmona-Fontaine (2010) for an overview and evidence for the phenomenon in vivo.
- 6.
In a nematic phase, typically observed in systems such as liquid crystals, the constituents align parallel to each other, but do not form ordered layers. In bacteria, this has been referred to as a “bio-nematic” phase.
- 7.
This difference in interaction type does not prevent the collective behavior of the actin filaments from being described as “nematic”, in the sense that they align but do not form ordered layers.
- 8.
References
Aldana M, Dossetti V, Huepe C, Kenkre VM, Larralde H (2007) Phase transitions in systems of self-propelled agents and related network models. Phys Rev Lett 98:095702
Aldana M, Larralde H, Vazquez B (2009) On the emergence of collective order in swarming systems: a recent debate. Int J Mod Phys B 23:3661–3685
Baglietto G, Albano EV, Candia J (2012) Criticality and the onset of ordering in the standard Vicsek model. Interface Focus 2:708–714
Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Lecomte V, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008a) Interaction ruling collective animal behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:1232–1237
Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008b) Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behavior. Anim Behav 76:201–215
Barberis L, Albano EV (2014) Evidence of a robust universality class in the critical behavior of self-propelled agents: metric versus topological interactions. Phys Rev E 89:012139
Barnsley M (1993) Fractals Everywhere. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco
Baskaran A, Marchetti MC (2009) Statistical mechanics and hydrodynamics of bacterial suspensions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(37):15567–15572
Battersby S (2015) The cells that flock together. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(26):7883–7885
Bazazi S, Buhl J, Hale JJ, Anste ML, Sword GA, Simpson SJ, Couzin ID (2008) Collective motion and cannibalism in locust migratory bands. Curr Biol 18:735–739
Beekman M, Sumpter DJT, Ratnieks FLW (2001) Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh’s ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9703–9706
Benisty S, Ben-Jacob E, Ariel G, Be’er A (2015) Antibiotic-induced anomalous statistics of collective bacterial swarming. Phys Rev Lett 114(1):018105
Bialek W, Cavagna A, Giardina I, Mora T, Silvestri E, Viale M, Walczak A (2012) Statistical mechanics for natural flocks of birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(13):4786–4791
Biro D, Sumpter DJ, Meade J, Guilford T (2006) From compromise to leadership in pigeon homing. Curr Biol 16(21):2123–2128
Brugués J, Needleman D (2014) Physical basis of spindle self-organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(52):18496–18500
Brush SG (1967) History of the Lenz-Ising model. Rev Mod Phys 39(4):883–895
Buhl J, Sumpter DJT, Couzin ID, Hale JJ, Despland E, Miller ER, Simpson SJ (2006) From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science 312:1402–1406
Butler MT, Wang Q, Harshey RM (2010) Cell density and mobility protect swarming bacteria against antibiotics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(8):3776–3781
Butt T, Mufti T, Humayun A, Rosenthal PB, Khan S, Khan S, Molloy JE (2010) Myosin motors drive long range alignment of actin filaments. J Biol Chem 285(7):4964–4974
Camperi M, Cavagna A, Giardina I, Parisi G, Silvestri E (2012) Spatially balanced topological interaction grants optimal cohesion in flocking models. Interface Focus 2:715–725
Cavagna A, Cimarelli A, Giardina I, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Santagati R, Stefanini F (2008a) New statistical tools for analyzing the structure of animal groups. Math Biosci 214:32–37
Cavagna A, Giardina I, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A, Viale M, Zdravkovic V (2008b) The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behavior. 1: empirical methods. Anim Behav 76:217–236
Cavagna A, Giardina I, Orlandi A, Parisi G, Procaccini A (2008c) The STARFLAG handbook on collective animal behavior. 2: three-dimensional analysis. Anim Behav 76:237–248
Cavagna A, Cimarelli A, Giardina I, Parisi G, Santagati R, Stefanini F, Viale M (2010) Scale-free correlations in starling flocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11865–11870
Cavagna A, Duarte Queriós SM, Giardina I, Stefanini F, Viale M (2013) Diffusion of individual birds in starling flocks. Proc R Soc B 280(1756):20122484
Chang WK, Carmona-Fontaine C, Xavier JB (2013) Tumour-stromal interactions generate emergent persistence in collective cancer cell migration. Interface Focus 3(4):20130017
Chaté H, Ginelli F, Grégoire G (2007) Comment on “Phase transitions in systems of self-propelled agents and related network models”. Phys Rev Lett 99:229601
Chen X, Dong X, Be’er A, Swinney HL, Zhang HP (2012) Scale-invariant correlations in dynamic bacterial clusters. Phys Rev Lett 108(14):148101
Coburn L, Cerone L, Torney C, Couzin ID, Neufeld Z (2013) Tactile interactions lead to coherent motion and enhanced chemotaxis of migrating cells. Phys Biol 10(4):046002
Couzin ID (2009) Collective cognition in animal groups. Trends Cogn Sci 13(1):36–43
Couzin ID, Krause J, James R, Ruxton GD, Franks NR (2002) Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol 218:1–11
Couzin ID, Krause J, Franks NR, Levin SA (2005) Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature 433:513–516
Czirók A, Stanley HE, Vicsek T (1997) Spontaneously ordered motion of self-propelled particles. J Phys A Math Gen 30:1375–1385
Das T, Safferling K, Rausch S, Grabe N, Boehm H, Spatz JP (2015) A molecular mechanotransduction pathway regulates collective migration of epithelial cells. Nat Cell Biol 17(3):276–287
Deisboeck TS, Couzin ID (2009) Collective behavior in cancer cell populations. BioEssays 31(2):190–197
Deneubourg J-L, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels J-M (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant. J Insect Behav 3:159–168
Dombrowski C, Cisneros L, Chatkaew S, Goldstein RE, Kessler JO (2004) Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys Rev Lett 93(9):098103
Dorigo M, Maniezzo V, Colorni A (1996) The ant system: optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Trans Syst Man [sic!] Cybern B 26(1):1–13
Dussutour A, Fourcassie V, Helbing D, Deneubourg J-L (2004) Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions. Nature 428:70–73
Dyer JRG, Ioannou CC, Morrell LJ, Croft DP, Couzin ID, Waters DA, Krause J (2008) Consensus decision making in human crowds. Anim Behav 75:461–470
Giardina I (2008) Collective behavior in animal groups: theoretical models and empirical studies. HFSP J 2(4):205–219
Ginelli F, Peruani F, Bär M, Chaté H (2010) Large-scale collective properties of self-propelled rods. Phys Rev Lett 104:184502
Grégoire G, Chaté H (2004) Onset of collective and cohesive motion. Phys Rev Lett 92(2):025702
Grégoire G, Chaté H, Tu Y (2003) Moving and staying together without a leader. Phys D 181:157–170
Hamilton WD (1971) Geometry for the selfish herd. J Theor Biol 31:295–311
Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature 407:487–490
Hemelrijk CK, Kunz H (2005) Density distribution and size sorting in fish schools: an individual-based model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:178–187
Hussain S, Molloy JE, Khan SM (2013) Spatiotemporal dynamics of actomyosin networks. Biophys J 105(6):1456–1465
Kraikivski P, Lipowsky R, Kierfeld J (2006) Enhanced ordering of interacting filaments by molecular motors. Phys Rev Lett 96:258103
Lai S, Tremblay J, Déziel E (2009) Swarming motility: a multicellular behaviour conferring antimicrobial resistance. Environ Microbiol 11(1):126–136
Loose M, Mitchison TJ (2014) The bacterial cell division proteins FtsA and FtsZ self-organize into dynamic cytoskeletal patterns. Nat Cell Biol 16(1):38–46
Mayor R, Carmona-Fontaine C (2010) Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends Cell Biol 20(6):319–328
Ordemann A, Balázsi G, Caspari E, Moss F (2003) Daphnia swarms: from single agent dynamics to collective vortex formation. In: Bezrukov SM, Frauenfelder H, Moss F (eds) Fluctuations and Noise in Biological, Biophysical, and Biomedical Systems. Proc. SPIE 5510:172–179
Partridge BL (1982) The structure and function of fish schools. Sci Am 246:114–123
Partridge BL, Pitcher T, Cullen JM, Wilson J (1980) The three-dimensional structure of fish schools. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 6:277–288
Peterson GD (1993) Animal aggregation: experimental simulation using vision-based behavioural rules. In: Nadel L, Stein DL (eds) 1992 Lectures in Complex Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Pimentel JA, Aldana M, Huepe C, Larralde H (2008) Intrinsic and extrinsic noise effects on phase transitions of network models with applications to swarming systems. Phys Rev E 77:061138
Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model. Comput Graph 21(4):25–34
Romey WL (1996) Individual differences make a difference in the trajectories of simulated fish schools. Ecol Model 92:65–77
Schaller V, Weber C, Semmrich C, Frey E, Bausch AR (2010) Polar patterns of driven filaments. Nature 467(7311):73–77
Silverberg JL, Bierbaum M, Sethna JP, Cohen I (2013) Collective motion of humans in mosh and circle pits at heavy metal concerts. Phys Rev Lett 110:228701
Simha RA, Ramaswamy S (2002) Hydrodynamics fluctuations and instabilities in ordered suspensions of self-propelled particles. Phys Rev Lett 89(5):058101
Simpson SJ, Sword GA, Lorch PD, Couzin IA (2006) Cannibal crickets on a forced march for protein and salt. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(11):4152–4156
Still GK (2014) Introduction to Crowd Science. Taylor and Francis Group, CRC Press, Boca Raton
Strefler J, Erdmann U, Schimansky-Geier L (2008) Swarming in three dimensions. Phys Rev E 78:031927
Strogatz SH (1994) Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos with Applications to Physics and Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Sumino Y, Nagai KH, Shitaka Y, Tanaka D, Yoshikawa K, Chaté H, Oiwa K (2012) Large-scale vortex lattice emerging from collectively moving microtubules. Nature 483(7390):448–452
Szabó B, Szöllösi GJ, Gönci B, Jurányi ZS, Selmeczi D, Vicsek T (2006) Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. Phys Rev E 74:061908
Toner J, Tu Y (1995) Long-range order in a two-dimensional dynamical XY model: how birds fly together. Phys Rev Lett 75(23):4326–4329
Toner J, Tu Y (1998) Flocks, herds and schools: a quantitative theory of flocking. Phys Rev E 58:4828–4858
Toner J, Tu Y, Ramaswamy S (2005) Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks. Ann Phys 318:170–244
Vicsek T (2012) Swarming microtubules. Nature 483(7390):411–412
Vicsek T, Czirók A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I, Schochet O (1995) Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys Rev Lett 75(6):1226–1229
Volfson D, Cookson S, Hasty J, Tsimring LS (2008) Biomechanical ordering of dense cell populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(40):15346–15351
Vollmer J, Vegh AG, Lange C, Eckhardt B (2006) Vortex formation by active agents as a model for Daphnia swarming. Phys Rev E 73:061924
Wioland H, Woodhouse FG, Dunkel J, Kessler JO, Goldstein RE (2013) Confinement stabilizes a bacterial suspension into a spiral vortex. Phys Rev Lett 110:268102
Yeomans JM (1992) Statistical Mechanics of Phase Transitions. Oxford University Press (Clarendon Press), Oxford
Zhang HP, Be’er A, Florin EL, Swinney HL (2010) Collective motion and density fluctuations in bacterial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(31):13626–13630
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bahar, S. (2018). Flocking, Swarming, and Communicating. In: The Essential Tension. The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1054-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1054-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1052-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1054-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)