Abstract
Causal Agency Theory grew out of research and intervention development with, primarily, youth with disabilities. Much of the self-determination research in the disability context has examined interventions to teach or promote skills such as problem solving, goal setting, self-advocacy, and such and was, often, not theory-driven. Causal Agency Theory, however, emerged from research and theory pertaining to self-determination in the broader context of personality psychology and within the context of adolescent development, and understanding of the self-determination construct, from the onset, was heavily influenced by and drew from work in the early stages of the development of SDT. This chapter provides an overview of research in special education and related disciplines, as driven by Causal Agency Theory. We then discuss the knowledge and information from this literature base that can inform knowledge pertaining to self-determination, in general.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Algozzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D. W., & Wood, W. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219–277.
Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a science of personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anokye, A. D. (2013). Standard language ideology and African American Vernacular English. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–3). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Cobb, B., Lehmann, J., Newman-Gonchar, R., & Morgen, A. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 108–114.
deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington: Lexington Books.
Deci, E. L. (2004). Promoting intrinsic motivation and self-determination in people with mental retardation. In H. Switzky, L. Hickson, R. Schalock, & M. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Personality and motivational systems in mental retardation, International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 28, pp. 1–29). San Diego: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., & Chandler, C. L. (1986). The importance of motivation for the future of the LD field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 587–594.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). Self-perceptions, motivation, and adjustment in learning disabled children: A multiple group comparison study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 177–184.
Heater, D. (1994). National self-determination: Woodrow Wilson and his legacy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Martin, J. E., & Marshall, L. H. (1996). ChoiceMaker: Infusing self-determination instruction into the IEP and transition process. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 215–236). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Martin, J. E., Van Dycke, J., Christense, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E., & Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.
Mithaug, D. E. (1993). Self-regulation theory: How optimal adjustment maximizes gain. Westport: Praeger Books.
Mithaug, D. (1996). The optimal prospects principle: A theoretical basis for rethinking instructional practices for self-determination. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 147–165). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Mithaug, D. (1998). Your right, my obligation? Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 41–43.
Mithaug, D. E., Campeau, P. L., & Wolman, J. M. (2003). Assessing self-determination prospects among students with and without disabilities. In D. E. Mithaug, D. K. Mithaug, M. Agran, J. E. Martin, & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self determined learning theory: Construction, verification, and evaluation (pp. 61–76). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nirje, B. (1972). The right to self-determination. In W. Wolfensberger (Ed.), Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services (pp. 176–193). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
Powers, L. E., Geenen, S., Powers, J., Pommier-Satya, S., Turner, A., Dalton, L., et al. (2012). My life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2179–2187.
Seong, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., & Little, T. D. (2015). Effects of the self-directed individualized education program on self-determination and transition of adolescents with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 132–141.
Shogren, K. A., Lopez, S. J., Wehmeyer, M. L., Little, T. D., & Pressgrove, C. L. (2006). The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 37–52.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A., Little, T., & Lopez, S. (2015a). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263.
Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Rifenbark, G. G., & Little, T. D. (2015b). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41.
Stancliffe, R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1995). Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation. The Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 319–328.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Beyond self-determination: Causal agency theory. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16, 337–359.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Reexamining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013a). The story of intellectual disability: An evolution of meaning, understanding, and public perception. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013b). Handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Abery, B. (2013). Self-determination and choice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5), 399–411.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (1999). Self-determination across living and working environments: A matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 353–363.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with mental retardation as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 371–383.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Lawrence, M. (1995). Whose future is it anyway? Promoting student involvement in transition planning with a student-directed process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 69–83.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Metzler, C. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111–119.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Mithaug, D. (2006). Self-determination, causal agency, and mental retardation. In L. M. Glidden (Series Ed.) & H. Swtizky (Vol. Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation: Vol. 31 current perspectives on individual differences in personality and motivation in persons with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities (pp. 31–71). San Diego: Academic Press.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Lee, Y., Williams-Diehm, K., & Shogren, K. A. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of Whose Future is it Anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(1), 45–56.
Williams, R. R. (1989). Creating a new world of opportunity: Expanding choice and self-determination in lives of Americans with severe disability by 1992 and beyond. In R. Perske (Ed.), Proceedings from the national conference on self-determination (pp. 16–17). Minneapolis: Institute on Community Integration.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S., Shogren, K., Williams-Diehm, K., & Soukup, J. (2012). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195–210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wehmeyer, M.L., Shogren, K.A. (2017). Applications of the Self-Determination Construct to Disability. In: Wehmeyer, M., Shogren, K., Little, T., Lopez, S. (eds) Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1040-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1042-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)