Skip to main content

Applications of the Self-Determination Construct to Disability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course

Abstract

Causal Agency Theory grew out of research and intervention development with, primarily, youth with disabilities. Much of the self-determination research in the disability context has examined interventions to teach or promote skills such as problem solving, goal setting, self-advocacy, and such and was, often, not theory-driven. Causal Agency Theory, however, emerged from research and theory pertaining to self-determination in the broader context of personality psychology and within the context of adolescent development, and understanding of the self-determination construct, from the onset, was heavily influenced by and drew from work in the early stages of the development of SDT. This chapter provides an overview of research in special education and related disciplines, as driven by Causal Agency Theory. We then discuss the knowledge and information from this literature base that can inform knowledge pertaining to self-determination, in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Algozzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D. W., & Wood, W. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 219–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a science of personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anokye, A. D. (2013). Standard language ideology and African American Vernacular English. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–3). London: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, B., Lehmann, J., Newman-Gonchar, R., & Morgen, A. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(2), 108–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (2004). Promoting intrinsic motivation and self-determination in people with mental retardation. In H. Switzky, L. Hickson, R. Schalock, & M. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Personality and motivational systems in mental retardation, International review of research in mental retardation (Vol. 28, pp. 1–29). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Chandler, C. L. (1986). The importance of motivation for the future of the LD field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 587–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). Self-perceptions, motivation, and adjustment in learning disabled children: A multiple group comparison study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 177–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heater, D. (1994). National self-determination: Woodrow Wilson and his legacy. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. E., & Marshall, L. H. (1996). ChoiceMaker: Infusing self-determination instruction into the IEP and transition process. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 215–236). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. E., Van Dycke, J., Christense, W. R., Greene, B. A., Gardner, J. E., & Lovett, D. L. (2006). Increasing student participation in IEP meetings: Establishing the self-directed IEP as an evidenced-based practice. Exceptional Children, 72, 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithaug, D. E. (1993). Self-regulation theory: How optimal adjustment maximizes gain. Westport: Praeger Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithaug, D. (1996). The optimal prospects principle: A theoretical basis for rethinking instructional practices for self-determination. In D. J. Sands & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 147–165). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithaug, D. (1998). Your right, my obligation? Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 23, 41–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mithaug, D. E., Campeau, P. L., & Wolman, J. M. (2003). Assessing self-determination prospects among students with and without disabilities. In D. E. Mithaug, D. K. Mithaug, M. Agran, J. E. Martin, & M. L. Wehmeyer (Eds.), Self determined learning theory: Construction, verification, and evaluation (pp. 61–76). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirje, B. (1972). The right to self-determination. In W. Wolfensberger (Ed.), Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services (pp. 176–193). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, L. E., Geenen, S., Powers, J., Pommier-Satya, S., Turner, A., Dalton, L., et al. (2012). My life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2179–2187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seong, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., & Little, T. D. (2015). Effects of the self-directed individualized education program on self-determination and transition of adolescents with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 38(3), 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, K. A., Lopez, S. J., Wehmeyer, M. L., Little, T. D., & Pressgrove, C. L. (2006). The role of positive psychology constructs in predicting life satisfaction in adolescents with and without cognitive disabilities: An exploratory study. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A., Little, T., & Lopez, S. (2015a). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50(3), 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Rifenbark, G. G., & Little, T. D. (2015b). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stancliffe, R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1995). Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation. The Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 319–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Beyond self-determination: Causal agency theory. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 16, 337–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Reexamining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013a). The story of intellectual disability: An evolution of meaning, understanding, and public perception. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013b). Handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Abery, B. (2013). Self-determination and choice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51(5), 399–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (1999). Self-determination across living and working environments: A matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Bolding, N. (2001). Enhanced self-determination of adults with mental retardation as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 371–383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Lawrence, M. (1995). Whose future is it anyway? Promoting student involvement in transition planning with a student-directed process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Metzler, C. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111–119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., & Mithaug, D. (2006). Self-determination, causal agency, and mental retardation. In L. M. Glidden (Series Ed.) & H. Swtizky (Vol. Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation: Vol. 31 current perspectives on individual differences in personality and motivation in persons with mental retardation and other developmental disabilities (pp. 31–71). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Lee, Y., Williams-Diehm, K., & Shogren, K. A. (2011). A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of Whose Future is it Anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 34(1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. R. (1989). Creating a new world of opportunity: Expanding choice and self-determination in lives of Americans with severe disability by 1992 and beyond. In R. Perske (Ed.), Proceedings from the national conference on self-determination (pp. 16–17). Minneapolis: Institute on Community Integration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S., Shogren, K., Williams-Diehm, K., & Soukup, J. (2012). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 46(4), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael L. Wehmeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wehmeyer, M.L., Shogren, K.A. (2017). Applications of the Self-Determination Construct to Disability. In: Wehmeyer, M., Shogren, K., Little, T., Lopez, S. (eds) Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1042-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics