Abstract
The methods described in this chapter are designed to assess a relatively large number of social impacts caused by an action that influences the value chain. Some methods assess a single impact in a relatively accurate, fast, and generic manner; others assess several impacts, but are time-consuming and lack genericity. The methods are presented here based on the period (relative to the action) in which they occur (before, during, or after). There are four groups of methods for carrying out an ex-ante social impact assessment of an action: we can ask actors to state their expectations; we can extrapolate trends observed in the past; we can use figures obtained from environmental life cycle assessments; or we can rely on a combination of these different sources. The in itinere assessment methods are based on monitoring performance criteria. Either they are developed ad hoc for a particular case, or they rely on a dashboard of indicators that can either be general or specific to a sector, such as the agrifood sector. Methods for ex-post assessment, which assess the impacts of a completed action, differ based on whether or not they were subject to prior monitoring. The advantages and disadvantages of these different methods are reviewed, as are their optimal conditions for use. While CIRAD is currently working on all the methods mentioned here, it is focusing in particular on methods for predicting social impacts because they are best able to contribute to the design – or redesign – of agri-chains.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A theory that explains how a cause, or a set of related causes, results in consequences in case of a change. This is thus the description of a pathway.
- 2.
Framework Programme (full name: Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development).
References
Bocoum I, Macombe C, Revéret JP (2015) Anticipating impacts on health based on changes in income inequality caused by life cycles. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(3):405–417
Bousset JP, Macombe C, Taverne M (2005) D 7.3.1. Participatory methods, guidelines and good practice guidance to be applied throughout the project to enhance problem definition, co-learning, synthesis and dissemination. Deliverable of the seamless European project (project no. 010036) of the 6th framework programme
Dreyer LC, Niemann AL, Hauschild MZ (2003) Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and eco-indicator 99. Does it matter which one you choose? Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(4):191–200
Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, Loeillet D, Benhmad F, Rolo SA (2012) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway. The case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(2):490–503. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0490-z Accessed 5 May 2016
Garrabé M, Feschet P (2013) Un cas particulier: l’ACV sociale des Capacités. In: Macombe C (ed) ACV sociales Effets socio-économiques dans les chaînes de valeurs. Cirad, Paris, pp 97–117
Gillet C, Loeillet D (2013) Pratique de l’évaluation sociale du cycle de vie d’une filière. In: Macombe C (ed) ACV sociales Effets socio-économiques dans les chaînes de valeurs. Cirad, Paris, pp 119–139
Guellec D, Ralle P (1996) Les nouvelles théories de la croissance. La Découverte, coll. Repères, Paris, p. 128
Hazir Ö (2014) A review of analytical models, approaches and decision support tools in project monitoring and control. Int J Project Manag 33(4):808–815
Mathé S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514
McCartney G, Collins C, MacKenzie M (2013) What (or who) causes health inequalities: theories, evidence and implications? Health Pol 113(3):221–227. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.05.021 Accessed 5 May 2016
Prosuite Report (2013) 7th framework programme of the European Union. http://www.prosuite.org/web/guest/home;jsessionid=2338C218E98000A099407613F12DE976. Accessed 5 May 2016
Spriensma R, Goedkoop M (2001) The eco-indicator 99: a damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, Methodoloy report, report no. 1999/36A. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Amersfoort, p. 87
Weidema B (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(Suppl 1):89–96
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Éditions Quæ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macombe, C., Loeillet, D. (2017). Instruments to Assess the Social Impacts of Value Chains. In: Biénabe, E., Rival, A., Loeillet, D. (eds) Sustainable Development and Tropical Agri-chains. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1016-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1016-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1015-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1016-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)