Abstract
The first tools to assess agri-chains focused on their economic aspects. Following requests from professionals from different agri-chains, CIRAD undertakes original research to develop methods for the environmental and social assessment of agri-chains. Indeed, although the production of food consumes resources and causes pollution, thus leading to various types of externalities, it remains an essential activity. It also generates positive or adverse social effects. Even though some large multinational companies wish to reduce their environmental impacts or improve their social impact, their desire or willingness is not sufficient. It is necessary to evaluate the environmental and social consequences of their actions in the most relevant manner possible. This chapter focuses on life cycle assessment methods because they are suitable for a chain-based reasoning and, due to their design, are the only methods that take the transfer of impacts into account. Since the pollution emitted by an agri-chain (or areas of consumption of non-renewable resources) can be spread out over several sites, the life cycle assessment method replaces the direct measurement of emissions. These are indirect assessment methods based on benchmarks stored in databases. Several configurations are possible in order to define boundaries (at least the spatial and temporal boundaries, but also that of affected actors in the case of a social life cycle assessment) of the system that will be studied by this type of analysis. The extent of change (marginal or extensive which modifies the system’s structure itself) also influences the determination of the system’s boundaries. The variety and sophistication of tools available for this type of assessment reflects the strong and ever increasing societal demand. The assessment addresses four key requirements: strengthening one’s market power, adjusting one’s action plan, acquiring knowledge in order to decide, and the need for self-assurance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The aim of the attributional approach is thus to attribute impacts to one or the other life cycle phases (and, in this way, identify the phase with the highest impact), starting with the assumption that the impacts will not significantly change the system of the product itself.
- 2.
The consequential approach thus takes into account the consequences of change on the system of the product itself.
References
Bassene JB, Quiedeville S, Chabrol D, Lançon F, Moustier P 2014 Organisation en réseau et durabilité systémique de deux filières alimentaires (riz biologique et petit épeautre en France). In: Actes des 8e journées de recherches en sciences sociales, Inra/SFER/Cirad, Grenoble, France, 11–12 December 2014, 24 p
FAO (2006) Livestock’s long shadow, environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome. 26 p
Gabriel P, Gabriel P (2004) Diffusion du développement durable dans le monde des affaires, Un schéma conventionnel. Rev Fr Gest 152:199–213
Heiskanen E (2002) The institutional logic of life cycle thinking. J Clean Prod 10(5):427–437
Hellweg S, Milà i Canal L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science, 344(6188):1109–1113. doi:10.1126/science.1248361. Retrieved 28 April 2016
Laufer WS (2003) Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. J Bus Ethics 43(3):253–261
Macombe C, Loeillet D (eds) (2014). Social LCA in progress. In: 4th SocSem. Pre-proceedings, 4th international seminar in social LCA. FruiTrop Thema, Montpellier, 19–21 November, 2014
Macombe C, Loeillet D (2015) In food supply chain social LCA, what to do? Keynote in session 2.4 Sustainability assessment of food supply chain: socio-economic drivers and impacts. In: Actes de la conférence: LCA for “Feeding the planet and energy for life”, Stresa, 6–7 October, Milan, Expo 2015, 8 October
Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216
Missimer M, Robèrt KH, Broman G, Sverdrup H (2010) Exploring the possibility of a systematic and generic approach to social sustainability. J Clean Prod 18(10–11):1107–1112
Müller B (2007) Food miles or poverty eradication? The moral duty to eat African strawberries at Christmas. Oxford Energy and Environment comment, octobre. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, Oxford. 6 p. Retrieved 28 April 2016, http://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Oct2007-Moralstrawberries-BenitoMuller.pdf
O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Approach and methodological development. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):231–237
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Éditions Quæ
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loeillet, D., Macombe, C. (2017). Why and How to Assess the Contribution of an Agri-Chain to Sustainable Development?. In: Biénabe, E., Rival, A., Loeillet, D. (eds) Sustainable Development and Tropical Agri-chains. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1016-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1016-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-1015-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-1016-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)