Skip to main content

Landscape: The Thing About Landscape’s Nature: Is It a Creature/Monster of the Map?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 885 Accesses

Abstract

Is the nature of landscape something that can be mapped, or is the landscape itself a thing or creature of the map? Or perhaps even a “monster” of the map? These are questions around which landscape studies have revolved in recent years. In this chapter I trace the two sides of the question and provide a capsule history of contemporary geographical scholarship, focusing on the contributions of Carl Sauer and European geographers. This landscape approach still dominates much of continental and especially German geography , but in Anglo-America it has declined and landscape has come to be seen not so much as some thing you can map, but rather as a thing of the map, that is, a creature born of cartography. I suggest a third alternative, which opens up new ways of thinking about things, nature, landscape and mapping. Maps are foundational pieces in the study of traditional and also postmodern and “non-modernist” landscape which in contemporary geography is concerned with the social bases for things governing and historically developing inter-relationships between society and nature—this is the thing about lansdscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abler, R., Gould, P., & Adams, J. S. (1971). Spatial organization: The geographer’s view of the world. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. (1982). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, J. (1999). Recovering landscape: Essays in contemporary landscape architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (1984). Social formation and symbolic landscape. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (1993). The palladian landscape: Geographical change and its cultural representations in sixteenth-century Italy. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2001). Apollo’s eye: A cartographic genealogy of the earth in the western imagination. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2004). Landscape AND Landschaft [lecture delivered at the Spatial Turn in History Symposium, German Historical Institute, February 19]. German Historical Institute Bulletin, 35, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D. (2006). Modernity, community and the landscape idea. Journal of Material Culture, 11, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, D., & Jackson, P. (1987). New directions in cultural geography. Area, 19(2), 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. B. (1988). Maps, knowledge, and power. In S. Daniels & D. Cosgrove (Eds.), The iconography of landscape (pp. 277–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1939). The nature of geography. Lancaster, PA: Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1958). The concept of geography as a science of space, from Kant and Humboldt to Hettner. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 40, 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1959). Perspective on the nature of geography. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1971). The thing. In A. Hofstadter (Ed.), Poetry, language, thought (pp. 165–182). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The temporality of landscape. In T. Ingold (Ed.), The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill (pp. 189–218). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (1755 [1968]). A dictionary of the English language. London: W. Strahan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, W. (2010). The ‘Dingpolitik’ of wind energy in northern German landscapes: an ethnographic case study. Landscape Research, 35(2), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). From realpolitik to dingpolitik or how to make things public. In P. Weibel & B. Latour (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 4–32). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighly, J. (1937). Some comments on contemporary geographic method. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 27(3), 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D. (1961). Geography, experience and imagination: Towards a geographical epistemology. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 51(3), 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D., & Prince, H. C. (1964). The English landscape. Geographical Review, 54(3), 309–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, D., & Prince, H. C. (1965). English landscape tastes. Geographical Review, 55, 186–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, R. J. (2004). Landscape, literature and English religious culture, 1660–1800: Samuel Johnson and languages of natural description. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster. (1996). Collegiate dictionary. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (1984). Nature’s ideological landscape: A literary and geographic perspective on its development and preservation on Denmark’s Jutland heath. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (1996). Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 86(4), 630–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2002). Landscape, nature and the body politic. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2004). This is not a landscape: Circulating reference and land shaping. In H. Palang (Ed.), European rural landscapes: Persistence and change in a globalising environment (pp. 41–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape ‘conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 32(5), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2008a). Has “geography” always been modern?: Choros, (non)representation, performance, and the landscape. Environment and Planning A, 40, 1843–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2008b). The Jutland Cipher—Unlocking the meaning and power of a contested landscape terrain. In M. Jones & K. R. Olwig (Eds.), Nordic landscapes: Region and belonging on the northern edge of Europe (pp. 12–49). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2010). The ‘British Invasion’: The ‘new’ cultural geography and beyond. Cultural Geographies, 17(2), 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2011a). All that is landscape is melted into air: The “aerography” of ethereal space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 29, 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig, K. R. (2011b). The earth is not a globe: landscape versus the “globalist” agenda. Landscape Research, 36(4), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1925). The morphology of landscape. University of California Publications in Geography, 2(2), 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1969a). The education of a geographer. In J. Leighly (Ed.), Land and life: A selection from the writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer. Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C. (1969b [orig. 1956]). The education of a geographer. In J. Leighly (Ed), Land and life: A selection from the writings of Carl Ortwin Sauer (pp. 389–404). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2007). Non-representational theory: Space, politics, affect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsing, A., Faire, L., Hathaway, M., Inoue, M., Satsuka, S., & Choy, T. (2009). A new form of collaboration in cultural anthropology: Matsutake worlds. American Ethnologist, 36(2), 380–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan, Y.-F. (1974). Topophilia: A study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures, cultures, spaces. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth R. Olwig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olwig, K.R. (2017). Landscape: The Thing About Landscape’s Nature: Is It a Creature/Monster of the Map?. In: Brunn, S., Dodge, M. (eds) Mapping Across Academia. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1011-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics