Abstract
A map of land use/cover (LULC) can be the starting point for producing a parameter map of overland hydraulic roughness. However, interpretation is important since land use/cover categories must be interpreted to yield a hydraulic parameter that governs the relationship between runoff depth and velocity. Despite what the map classification indicates, a more important aspect is the hydraulic roughness that runoff experiences as it flows over the land surface typical of a particular land use/cover classification. Modeling surface runoff assumes that the derived hydraulic parameters are representative of the land use/cover, at least as a starting point for calibration. Channel roughness will be seen to differ markedly from overland flow roughness coefficients and should be assigned based on channel characteristics rather than LULC. Deriving hydraulic roughness coefficients from land use classification schemes is the theme of this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackerman, D., and E.D. Stein. 2008. Estimating the Variability and Confidence of Land Use and Imperviousness Relationships at a Regional Scale. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 44: 996–1008. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00215.x
Barnes, H.H. 1967. Roughness characteristics of natural channels (No. 1849). US Govt. Print. Off.
Bochis, E.C. 2007. Magnitude of impervious surfaces in urban areas. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama).
Bochis, C. and R.E. Pitt. 2009. January. Land use and runoff uncertainty. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009@ Great Rivers, 1314–1324. ASCE.
Chow, V.T., D.R. Maidment, and L.W. Mays. 1988. Applied hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Crawford, N.H. and R.K. Linsley. 1966. Digital Simulation in Hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model 4.
Dingman, S.L. 2009. Fluvial hydraulics, p. 559. New York: Oxford University Press.
Emmett, W.W. 1970. The hydraulics of overland flow on hillslopes. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 662-A U.S. Washington D.C: Govt. Printing Office.
Engelund, F. and E. Hansen. 1967. A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. TEKNISKFORLAG Skelbrekgade 4 Copenhagen V, Denmark.
Engman, E.T. 1986. Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 112(1): 39–53.
Gilley, J.E., and S.C. Finkner. 1991. Hydraulic roughness coefficients as affected by random roughness. Soil and Water Division of ASA 34(3): 897–903.
Homer, C.H., J.A. Fry, and C.A. Barnes. 2012. The national land cover database. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 3020(4): 1–4.
Homer, C.G., J.A. Dewitz, L. Yang, S. Jin, P. Danielson, G. Xian, J. Coulston, N.D. Herold, J.D. Wickham, and K. Megown. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States-Representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 81(5): 345–354.
Huber, W.C. and L. Cannon. 2002. Modeling non-directly connected impervious areas in dense neighborhoods. Global Solutions for Urban Drainage 8–13.
Huggins, L.F. and Monke, E.J., 1966. The mathematical simulation of the hydrology of small watersheds. Technical Report No. 1, 130 pp. West Lafayette: Purdue University Water Resources Research Center, Indiana.
Kalyanapu, A.J., S.J. Burian, and T.N. McPherson. 2010. Effect of land use-based surface roughness on hydrologic model output. Journal of Spatial Hydrology 9(2).
McCuen, R.H. 1998. Hydrologic analysis and design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ree, W.O., and F.R. Crow. 1977. Friction factors for vegetated waterways of small slope. US Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service.
Sutherland, R. 2000. Methods for estimating the effective impervious area of urban watersheds. The practice of watershed protection, 193–195. Center for Watershed Protection.
Vieux, B.E., V.F. Bralts, L.J. Segerlind, and R.B. Wallace. 1990. Finite element watershed modeling: one dimensional elements. Journal of the Water Resources Planning and Management 116(6): 803–819.
Vieux, B.E., and N.S. Farajalla. 1994. Capturing the essential spatial variability in distributed hydrological modeling: Hydraulic roughness. Journal of Hydrological Processes 8: 221–236.
Zobeck, T.M., and C.A. Onstad. 1987. Tillage and rainfall effects on random roughness: A review. Soil and Tillage Res. 1: 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vieux, B.E. (2016). Hydraulic Roughness. In: Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0930-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0930-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0928-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0930-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)