Skip to main content

Case Studies in Distributed Hydrology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 74))

  • 1750 Accesses

Abstract

Case studies are presented that illustrate the principles of physics-based distributed hydrologic modeling. This chapter is organized by case study with a general description of the model, parameterization, and simulation used in each case. Within the context of three case studies, there is a common theme, namely each case study relies on high-resolution rainfall derived from radar and rain gauge; model parameters developed using geospatial data; and hydrologic predictions generated for analyzes spanning a range of space-time scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bedient, P.B., A. Holder, J.A. Benavides, and B.E. Vieux. 2003. Radar-based flood warning system—tropical storm Allison. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 89(6): 308–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., P.B. Bedient, and B. Buzcu-Guven. 2011. Long-term performance of a flood alert system and upgrade to FAS3: A Houston, Texas, case study. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 16(10): 818–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth, R.K., E.S. Thompson, and E.L. Peck. 1982. Evaporation atlas for the contiguous 48 United States. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service: US Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamlet, A.F., and D.P. Lettenmaier. 1999. Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(6): 1597–1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Numerical Mathematic (INM). 2008. World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 3 (CMIP3) Project Database: INMCM3.0 at Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Russian Academy of Science, Russia. NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre. http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/67074e181159ad29ead1ccf07e04517d. Accessed 9 March 2016.

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, and H.L. Miller (eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 996 pp. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/.

  • Juan, A., Z. Fang, and P.B. Bedient. 2015. Developing a radar-based flood alert system for sugar land, Texas. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering E5015001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Looper, J.P., and B.E. Vieux. 2012. An assessment of distributed flash flood forecasting accuracy using radar and rain gauge input for a physics-based distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 412: 114–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looper, J.P., B.E. Vieux, and M.A. Moreno. 2012. Assessing the impacts of precipitation bias on distributed hydrologic model calibration and prediction accuracy. Journal of Hydrology 418: 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, E.P. 2007. Uncertainty in hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Sierra Nevada, California under two emissions scenarios. Climatic Change 82: 309–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, G.A.C., T. Covey, M. Delworth, B. Latif, J.F.B. Mcavaney, R.J.Stouffer Mitchell, and K.E. Taylor. 2007. The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset—a new era in climate change research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 88(9): 1383–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N.L., K. Bashford, and E. Strem. 2003. Potential climate change impacts on California hydrology. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39(4): 771–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudin, L., C. Perrin, T. Mathevet, V. Andreassian, and C. Michel. 2006. Impact of biased and randomly corrupted inputs on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models. Journal of Hydrology. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reclamation. 2008. Sensitivity of Future CVP/SWP Operations to Potential Climate Change and Associated Sea Level Rise, Appendix R in Biological Assessment on the Continued Long-term Operations of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project, prepared by Bureau of Reclamation, 134. U.S. Department of the Interior, August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reclamation. 2009. Sensitivity of Future Central Valley Project and State Water Project Operations to Potential Climate Change and Associated Sea Level Rise, attachment to Appendix I in Second Administrative Draft Program EIS/EIR—San Joaquin River Restoration Program, 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reclamation. 2010. Climate Change and Hydrology Scenarios for Oklahoma Yield Studies. Technical Memorandum 86-68210-2010-01, Technical Service Center, Water Resources Planning and Operations Support Group, Water and Environmental Resources Division. April 2010, 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, D., D.B. Wolff, and D. Atlas. 1993. General probability-matched relations between radar reflectivity and rain rate. Journal of Applied Meteorology 32: 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.B., V. Koren, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S.M. Reed, Z. Cui, F. Moreda, B.A. Cosgrove, N. Mizukami and E.A. Anderson. 2012. Results of the DMIP 2 Oklahoma experiments. Journal of Hydrology 418: 17–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B.E., and P.B. Bedient. 2004. Assessing urban hydrologic prediction accuracy through event reconstruction. Special Issue on Urban Hydrology: Journal of Hydrology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B.E., C. Chen, J.E. Vieux, and K.W. Howard. 2003. Operational deployment of a physics-based distributed rainfall-runoff model for flood forecasting in Taiwan. In Proceedings, eds. Tachikawa, B. Vieux, K.P. Georgakakos, and E. Nakakita, International Symposium on Weather Radar Information and Distributed Hydrological Modelling, IAHS General Assembly at Sapporo, Japan, July 3–11, IAHS Red Book Publication No. 282: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B.E. and F.G. Moreda. 2003. Ordered Physics‐Based Parameter Adjustment of a Distributed Model. Calibration of Watershed Models, pp.267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B.E. 2004. Distributed hydrologic modeling. Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS, Springer: pp.217–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieux, B.E., P.M. Thompson, and J.E. Vieux. 2015. Forecasting the Magic Dragon: How Much Inflow Will There Be, and When Will It Arrive in Lake of the Ozarks? Conference Proceedings, HydroVision International, July 14–17, Portland Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, I.A., R.G. Allen, R. Elliott, M.E. Jensen, D. Itenfisu, B. Mecham, T.A. Howell, R. Snyder, P. Brown, S. Echings, and T. Spofford. 2000. ASCE’s standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. In Proceedings of the Watershed Management 2000 Conference, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C.B., A.A. Bradley, W.F. Krajewski, A. Kruger, and M.L. Morrissey. 2000. Evaluating NEXRAD multisensor precipitation estimates for operational hydrologic forecasting. Journal of Hydrometeorology 1(3): 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baxter E. Vieux .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vieux, B.E. (2016). Case Studies in Distributed Hydrology. In: Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 74. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0930-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics