Abstract
Metaphor makes our thoughts more vivid and fills our communication with richer imagery. Furthermore, according to the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT) of [30], metaphor also plays an important structural role in the organization and processing of conceptual knowledge. According to this account, the phenomenon of metaphor is not restricted to similarity-based extensions of meanings of individual words, but instead involves activating fixed mappings that reconceptualize one whole area of experience in terms of another. CMT produced a significant resonance in the fields of philosophy, linguistics, cognitive science and artificial intelligence and still underlies a large proportion of modern research on metaphor. However, there has to date been no comprehensive corpus-based study of conceptual metaphor, which would provide an empirical basis for evaluating the CMT using real-world linguistic data. The annotation scheme and the empirical study we present in this chapter is a step towards filling this gap. We test our annotation procedure in an experimental setting involving multiple annotators and estimate their agreement on the task. The goal of the study is to investigate (1) how intuitive the conceptual metaphor explanation of linguistic metaphors is for human annotators and whether it is possible to consistently annotate interconceptual mappings; (2) what are the main difficulties that the annotators experience during the annotation process; (3) whether one conceptual metaphor is sufficient to explain a linguistic metaphor or whether a chain of conceptual metaphors is needed. The resulting corpus annotated for conceptual mappings provides a new, valuable dataset for linguistic, computational and cognitive experiments on metaphor.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
BNC Baby is a four-million-word subset of the British National Corpus (BNC) [5], comprising four different genres: academic, fiction, newspaper and conversation. For more information see http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/corpus/babyinfo.html.
References
Agerri, R., Barnden, J.A., Lee, M.G., Wallington, A.M.: Metaphor, inference and domain-independent mappings. In: Proceedings of RANLP-2007, pp. 17–23, Borovets, Bulgaria (2007)
Barnden, J.A., Lee, M.G.: An artificial intelligence approach to metaphor understanding. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 6(1), 399–412 (2002)
Black, M.: Models and Metaphors. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1962)
Bowdle, Brian F., Gentner, D.: The career of metaphor. Psychol. Rev. 112, 193–216 (2005)
Burnard, L.: Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML Edition) (2007)
Bollegala, D., Shutova, E.: Metaphor interpretation using paraphrases extracted from the web. PLoS ONE 8(9), e74304 (2013)
Cameron, L.: Metaphor in Educational Discourse. Continuum, London (2003)
Charniak, E., Blaheta, D., Ge, N., Hall, K., Hale, J., Johnson, M.: BLLIP 1987–89 WSJ Corpus Release 1. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia (2000)
Chung, S.F., Ahrens, K., Huang, C.R.: Source domains as concept domains in metaphorical expressions. Int. J. Comput. Ling. Chin. Lang. Process. 10(4), 553–570 (2005)
Deignan, A.: The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In: Stefanowitsch, A., Gries, S.T. (eds.) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2006)
Fauconnier, G., Turner, M.: The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books (2002)
Feldman, J., Narayanan, S.: Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain Lang. 89(2), 385–392 (2004)
Feldman, J.A.: From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)
Gentner, D.: Structure mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognit. Sci. 7, 155–170 (1983)
Gentner, D., Imai, Mutsumi, Boroditsky, Lera: As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space-time metaphors. Lang. Cognit. Process. 47, 537–565 (2002)
Gibbs, R.: Literal meaning and psychological theory. Cognit. Sci. 8, 275–304 (1984)
Gibbs, R., Tendahl, M.: Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind Lang. 21, 379–403 (2006)
Glucksberg, S.: The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends Cognit. Sci. 7, 92–96 (2003)
Goatly, A.: The Language of Metaphors. Routledge, London (1997)
Gong, S.P., Ahrens, K., Huang, C.R.: Chinese word sketch and mapping principles: a corpus-based study of conceptual metaphors using the building source domain. Int. J. Comput. Process. Orient. Lang. 21(2), 3–17 (2008)
Grady, J.: Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. Technical report, Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley (1997)
Hardie, A., Koller, V., Rayson, P., Semino, E.: Exploiting a semantic annotation tool for metaphor analysis. In: Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference, Birmingham, UK (2007)
Haskell, R.E.: Cognitive science and the origin of lexical metaphor. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum 6(1), 291–331 (2002)
Izwaini, S.: Corpus-based study of metaphor in information technology. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Corpus-based Approaches to Figurative Language, Corpus Linguistics 2003, Lancaster, 27 March (2003)
Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., Horton, W.S.: Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? J. Mem. Lang. 43, 576–593 (2000)
Koivisto-Alanko, P., Tissari, H.: Sense and sensibility: rational thought versus emotion in metaphorical language. In: Stefanowitsch, A., Gries, S.T. (eds.) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2006)
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills (1980)
Krishnakumaran, S., Zhu, X.: Hunting elusive metaphors using lexical resources. Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language, pp. 13–20, Rochester, NY (2007)
Lakoff, G.: The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edn, pp. 202–251. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Lakoff, G., Espenson, J., Schwartz, A.: The master metaphor list. Technical report, University of California at Berkeley (1991)
Landis, J., Koch, G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1), 159–174 (1977)
Lönneker, B.: Lexical databases as resources for linguistic creativity: Focus on metaphor. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2004 Workshop on Language Resources for Linguistic Creativity (2004)
Lönneker-Rodman, B.: The hamburg metaphor database project. Issues Res. Creat. Lang. Res. Eval. 42, 293–318 (2008)
Lönneker, B., Eilts, C.: A current resource and future perspectives for enriching WordNets with metaphor information. In: Proceedings of the Second International WordNet Conference (GWC 2004), pp. 157–162, Brno, Czech Republic (2004)
Low, G., Todd, Z., Deignan, A., Cameron, L.: Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2010)
Lu, L., Ahrens, K.: Ideological influences on BUILDING metaphors in Taiwanese presidential speeches. Discourse Soc. 19(3), 383–408 (2008)
Martin, J.H.: Representing regularities in the metaphoric lexicon. In: Proceedings of the 12th conference on Computational linguistics, pp. 396–401 (1988)
Martin, J.H.: A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation. Academic Press Professional Inc, San Diego (1990)
Martin, J.H.: Metabank: a knowledge-base of metaphoric language conventions. Comput. Intell. 10, 134–149 (1994)
Martin, J.H.: A corpus-based analysis of context effects on metaphor comprehension. In: Stefanowitsch, A., Gries, S.T. (eds.) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2006)
Mason, Z.J.: Cormet: a computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Comput. Ling. 30(1), 23–44 (2004)
McGlone, Matthew S.: What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Lang. Commun. 27, 109–126 (2007)
Murphy, G.L.: On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60, 173–204 (1996)
Narayanan, S.: Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect (KARMA). Technical report, Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley (1997)
Narayanan, S.: Moving right along: a computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. In: Proceedings of AAAI 99, pp. 121–128. Orlando, Florida (1999)
Pinker, S.: The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. Viking Adult, USA, September (2007)
Pragglejaz Group: MIP.: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor Symb. 22, 1–39 (2007)
Reddy, M.: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In: Ortony, A. (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, 2nd edn, pp. 164–201. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1978)
Shalizi, C.R.: Analogy and Metaphor. http://bactra.org/notebooks/analogy.html (2003)
Shutova, E.: Models of Metaphor in NLP. In: Proceedings of ACL 2010, Uppsala, Sweden (2010)
Shutova, E.: Automatic metaphor interpretation as a paraphrasing task. In: Proceedings of NAACL 2010, pp. 1029–1037, Los Angeles, USA (2010)
Shutova, E.: Metaphor identification as interpretation. In: Proceedings of *SEM 2013, Atlanta, Georgia (2013)
Shutova, E., Teufel, S.: Metaphor Corpus annotated for source-target domain mappings. In: Proceedings of LREC 2010, Valletta, Malta (2010)
Shutova, E., Sun, L.: Unsupervised metaphor identification using hierarchical graph factorization clustering. In: Proceedings of NAACL 2013, Atlanta, GA, USA (2013)
Shutova, E., Sun, L., Korhonen, A.: Metaphor identification using verb and noun clustering. In: Proceedings of Coling 2010, Beijing, China (2010)
Shutova, E., Van de Cruys, T., Korhonen, A.: Unsupervised metaphor paraphrasing using a vector space model. In: Proceedings of COLING 2012, Mumbai, India (2012)
Siegel, S., Castellan, N.J.: Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1988)
Skorczynska Sznajder, H., Pique-Angordans, J.: A corpus-based description of metaphorical marking patterns inscientific and popular business discourse. In: Proceedings of European Research Conference on Mind,Language and Metaphor (Euresco Conference), Granada, Spain (2004)
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A.A., Krennmayr, T., Pasma, T.: A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2010)
Wallington, A.M., Barnden, J.A., Buchlovsky, P., Fellows, L., Glasbey, S.R.: Metaphor Annotation: A Systematic Study. Technical report, School of Computer Science, The University of Birmingham (2003)
Wikberg, K.: The role of corpus studies in metaphor research. In: Johannesson, N.-L., Minugh, D.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2006 Stockholm Metaphor Festival (2006)
Wilks, Y.: A preferential pattern-seeking semantics for natural language inference. Artif. Intell. 6, 53–74 (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shutova, E. (2017). Annotation of Linguistic and Conceptual Metaphor. In: Ide, N., Pustejovsky, J. (eds) Handbook of Linguistic Annotation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0879-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0881-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)