Skip to main content

Introduction: The Handbook of Linguistic Annotation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Linguistic Annotation

Abstract

The Handbook of Linguistic Annotation provides a comprehensive survey of the development and state-of-the-art for linguistic annotation of language resources, including methods for annotation scheme design, annotation creation, physical format considerations, annotation tools, annotation use, evaluation, etc. The volume is divided into two parts: Part I includes survey chapters on the various phases and considerations for an annotation project, and Part II consists of thirty-nine case studies describing major annotation projects for a broad range of linguistic phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The earliest automatic part-of-speech taggers include Greene and Rubin’s TAGGIT [19], Garside’s CLAWS [17], DeRose’s VOLSUNGA [13], and Church’s PARTS [6].

  2. 2.

    http://nlp.shef.ac.uk/parole/parole.html.

  3. 3.

    A few projects relied on manual annotation alone [31, 33, 45], partial “spot-checking” of automatically-generated annotations (e.g., the British National Corpus), or even combinations of several automatic annotators [41].

  4. 4.

    http://www.MTurk.com.

  5. 5.

    See chapter “Community standards” in this volume for an overview.

  6. 6.

    http://www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES/browse.html.

  7. 7.

    www.ilc.cnr.it/EAGLES/annotate/annotate.html.

  8. 8.

    http://link.springer.com/journal/10579.

  9. 9.

    http://www.cs.vassar.edu/~sigann.

  10. 10.

    http://oxygenxml.com.

  11. 11.

    http://linguistic-lod.org/llod-cloud.

References

  1. Artstein, R., Poesio, M.: Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Comput. Linguist. 34(4), 555–596 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjær, L., Kolodnytsky, M.: The NITE workbench. A tool for annotation of natural interactivity and multimodal data. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2002). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Las Palmas, Canary Islands - Spain (2002). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2002/pdf/214.pdf. ACL Anthology Identifier: L02-1214

  3. Bird, S., Day, D., Garofolo, J., Henderson, J., Laprun, C., Liberman, M.: ATLAS: a flexible and extensible architecture for linguistic annotation. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2000). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Athens, Greece (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bunt, H.: A methodology for designing semantic annotation languages exploiting semantic-syntactic isomorphisms. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Global Interoperability for Language Resources (ICGL2010), pp. 29–46. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carletta, J.: Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic. Comput. Linguist. 22(2), 249–254 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Church, K.W.: A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. In: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, ANLC ’88, pp. 136–143. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (1988). doi:10.3115/974235.974260. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/974235.974260

  7. Clear, J.H.: The British National Corpus. In: Landow, G.P., Delany, P. (eds.) The Digital Word, pp. 163–187. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Core, M., Ishizaki, M., Moore, J., Nakatani, C., Reithinger, N., Traum, D., Tutiya, S.: The report of the third workshop of the discourse resource initiative. Chiba University and Kazusa Academia Hall, Technical report (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V.: GATE: a framework and graphical development environment for robust nlp tools and applications. In: Proceedings of ACL’02 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham, H., Wilks, Y., Gaizauskas, R.: Software infrastructure for language engineering. In: Proceedings of the AISB Workshop on Language Engineering for Document Analysis and Recognition. Brighton, U.K. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Day, D., Aberdeen, J., Hirschman, L., Kozierok, R., Robinson, P., Vilain, M.: Mixed-initiative development of language processing systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pp. 348–355. Association for Computational Linguistics, Washington, DC, USA (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Day, D.S., McHenry, C., Kozierok, R., Riek, L.: Callisto: a configurable annotation workbench. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2004). European Language Resources Association (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. DeRose, S.J.: Grammatical category disambiguation by statistical optimization. Comput. Linguist. 14(1), 31–39 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doddington, G.R., Mitchell, A., Przybocki, M.A., Ramshaw, L.A., Strassel, S., Weischedel, R.M.: The automatic content extraction (ace) program - tasks, data, and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2004. European Language Resources Association (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Erjaveç, T., Ide, N.: The MULTEXT-East corpus. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 971–974 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrucci, D., Lally, A.: Uima: an architectural approach to unstructured information processing in the corporate research environment. Natural Lang. Eng. 10(3–4), 327–348 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garside, R.: The CLAWS word-tagging system. In: R. Garside, G. Sampson, G. Leech (eds.) The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Longman (1987). http://www.researchgate.net/publication/230876041_The_CLAWS_word-tagging_system

  18. Garside, R., Leech, G., Sampson, G.: The computational analysis of English: a corpus-based approach. Longman (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Greene, B.B., Rubin, G.M.: Automatic Grammatical Tagging of English. Brown University, Department of Linguistics (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grishman, R., Sundheim, B.: Message understanding conference-6: a brief history. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics - COLING ’96, vol. 1, pp. 466–471. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hellmann, S., Lehmann, J., Auer, S., Nitzschke, M.: Nif combinator: combining nlp tool output. In: 18th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW2012) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hovy, E., Lavid, J.: Towards a ‘science’ of corpus annotation: a new methodological challenge for corpus linguistics. Int. J. Transl. Stud. 22(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ide, N.: Corpus encoding standard: SGML guidelines for encoding linguistic corpora. In: Proceedings of the First International Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 1998), pp. 463–470. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ide, N.: Annotation science: from theory to practice and use. In: Rehm, G., Witt, A., Lemnitzer, L. (eds.) Data Structures for Linguistics Resources and Applications. Gunter Narr Verlag, Germany (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ide, N., Atwell, E. (eds.): Annotation science: state of the art in enhancing automatic linguistic annotation. In: Proceedings of the Workshop. European Language Resources Association (2006). http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2006/

  26. Ide, N., Bunt, H.: Anatomy of annotation schemes: mapping to GrAF. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Linguistic Annotation Workshop. LAW IV, pp. 247–255. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ide, N., Suderman, K.: The linguistic annotation framework: a standard for annotation interchange and merging. Lang. Resour. Eval. 48(3), 395–418 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ide, N., Véronis, J.: MULTEXT: multilingual text tools and corpora. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94), vol. I, pp. 588–592. Kyoto, Japan (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ide, N., Bonhomme, P., Romary, L.: XCES: an XML-based encoding standard for linguistic corpora. In: Proceedings of the Second Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2000). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Athens, Greece (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Isard, A., Mller, M.B., McKelvie, D., Mengel, A.: The MATE workbench - a tool for annotating xml corpora. In: Proceedings of Recherche d’Informations Assiste par Ordinateur (RIAO’2000). Paris (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jäborg, J.: Introduction to “This is Watson". Göteborg University, Institute för spräkvetenskaplig databehandling (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kučera, H., Francis, W.N.: Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Brown University Press, Providence (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Landes, S., Leacock, C., Tengi, R.I.: Building semantic concordances. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Litman, D., Hirschberg, J.: Disambiguating cue phrases in text and speech. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Computational Linguistics - COLING ’90, vol. 2, pp. 251–256. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Marcu, D., Amorrortu, E., Romera, M.: Experiments in constructing a corpus of discourse trees. In: Proceedings Towards Standards and Tools for Discourse Tagging, pp. 48–57 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Marcus, M.P., Marcinkiewicz, M.A., Santorini, B.: Building a large annotated corpus of English: the Penn Treebank. Comput. Linguist. 19(2), 313–330 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marcus, M., Kim, G., Marcinkiewicz, M.A., MacIntyre, R., Bies, A., Ferguson, M., Katz, K., Schasberger, B.: The penn treebank: annotating predicate argument structure. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, pp. 114–119. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Melamed, I.D.: Manual annotation of translational equivalence: the Blinker project. CoRR cmp-lg/9805005 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ng, H.T., Lim, C.Y., Foo, S.K.: A case study on inter-annotator agreement for word sense disambiguation. In: SIGLEX99: Standardizing Lexical Resources, pp. 351–14 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ogren, P.V.: Knowtator: a Protégé plug-in for annotated corpus construction. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology: Companion Volume: Demonstrations, pp. 273–275. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Paroubek, P.: Language resources as by-product of evaluation: the MultiTag example. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2000). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Athens, Greece (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Passonneau, R.J., Litman, D.J.: Intention-based segmentation: human reliability and correlation with linguistic cues. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. ACL ’93, pp. 148–155. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pustejovsky, J., Stubbs, A.: Natural Language Annotation for Machine Learning. O’Reilly Media, California (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Resnik, P.: Disambiguating noun groupings with respect to WordNet senses. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Very Large Corpora (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sampson, G.: English for the Computer: the SUSANNE corpus and analytic scheme. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Siegel, S., Castellan, N.: Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, second edn. McGraw–Hill, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Silverman, K.E.A., Beckman, M.E., Pitrelli, J.F., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C.W., Price, P., Pierrehumbert, J.B., Hirschberg, J.: ToBI: a standard for labeling English prosody. In: International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ISCA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nancy Ide .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ide, N. (2017). Introduction: The Handbook of Linguistic Annotation. In: Ide, N., Pustejovsky, J. (eds) Handbook of Linguistic Annotation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0879-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0881-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics