Abstract
Semiosis has a tendency to grow, to lead to more semiosis. Yet, organisms often need to decelerate that growth, or repeat parts of it; this occurs through the appearance of invariants. As Peirce argues, it is the “essential function of a sign to render inefficient relations efficient – not to set them into action, but to establish a habit or general rule whereby they will act …” (8.332). Beyond invariance, an important issue in respect of the continuity of nature as it encompasses culture is that of the apparent impediment or blockage to straightforward development of a phenomenon. As will be seen in Chap. 8, the issue is occasionally overlooked in understandings of culture; invariably, though, there will be plenty of evidence to reveal that one or another cultural phenomenon has not had a smooth trajectory delivering it to its current stage of development. Instead, it will have been subject to overdetermination and uneven development. In Chap. 8, it will be shown that the descriptions of nature offered by biosemiotics need to be alive to overdetermination and unevenness, too. In the present chapter, the focus is on the conceptualisation of impediments to development, some of their consequences and how they are played out in relation to one aspect of culture in particular, the interface of the visual and the nonverbal more generally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bentham J. In: Božovič M, editor. The panopticon writings. London: Verso; 1995.
Birdwhistell RL. Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1970.
Cobley P. Sebeok’s panopticon. In: Cobley et al., editors. “Semiotics Continues to Astonish”: how Thomas A. Sebeok shaped the future of the doctrine of signs. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2011. p. 85–114.
Darwin C. The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 6th ed. London: John Murray; 1872.
Deacon TW. Incomplete nature: how mind emerged from matter. New York: Norton; 2012a.
Deacon (2011) was in the reference list I submitted = Deacon TW. Consciousness is a matter of constraint. New Scientist. 2011; issue 2840; https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21228406-300-consciousness-is-a-matter-ofconstraint/ (last accessed 21 March 2016)
Deely J, Petrilli S, Ponzio A. The semiotic animal. New York: Legas; 2005.
Eagleton T. Figures of dissent: critical essays on fish, Spivak, Žižek and others. London: Verso; 2003.
Elkins J. Visual studies: a skeptical introduction. London: Taylor and Francis; 2003.
Fast J. Body language. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1970.
Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan, Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1977.
Freud S. Repression. In On metapsychology. The theory of psychoanalysis. (Pelican Freud Library 11.) ed. Angela Richards, trans. James Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1984[1915]. p. 139–58.
Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc R Soc Lond. 1979;B205(1161):581–98.
Gould SJ, Vrba ES. Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology. 1982;8:4–15.
Hall ET. The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor Books; 1966.
Hall JA, Knapp ML, editors. Nonverbal communication. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2013.
Hoffmeyer J. Semiotics of nature. In: Cobley P, editor. The Routledge companion to semiotics. London: Routledge; 2010b.
Hoffmeyer J, Kull K. Baldwin and biosemiotics: what intelligence is for. In: Weber BH, Depew DJ, editors. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
Ibrus I. Culture is becoming more visible and therefore richer. In: Development of estonian cultural space. Tallinn: Estonian Development Report; 2014/2015. p. 222–5.
Jameson F. Signatures of the visible. London: Routledge; 1990.
Jay M. Downcast eyes: the denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1993.
Kendon A. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Levin D. Keeping foucault and derrida in sight: panopticism and the politics of subversion. In: Sites of vision: the discursive construction of sight in the history of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997.
Machin D. Introduction. In: Machin, editor. Visual communication. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2014. p. 3–22.
Maher J. Seeing language in sign: the work of William C. Stokoe. Washington: Gallaudet University Press; 1997.
Mirzoeff N. An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge; 1999.
Mitchell WJT. Picture theory: essays on verbal and visual representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1994.
Peirce CS. Guessing. Hound Horn. 1929;2(3):267–82.
Petrilli S. Crossing out boundaries with global communication: the problem of the subject. Subj Matter. 2005;2(2):33–48.
Petrilli S, Ponzio A. Semiotics unbounded: interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2005.
Ponzio A. Signs, dialogue and ideology. Trans. Susan Petrilli. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 1993.
Ponzio A. The I questioned: Emmanuel Levinas and the critique of occidental reason. Subj Matter. 2006a;3(1):1–45
Ponzio A. The dialogic nature of sign. Trans. Susan Petrilli, New York: Legas; 2006b.
Ritchie TD, Sedikides C and Skowronski, JJ. Emotions experienced at event recall and the self: Implications for the regulation of self-esteem, self-continuity and meaningfulness. Memory. 2015; 24 (5): 577–591.
Ruesch J, Kees W. Nonverbal communication: notes on the visual perception of human relations. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1956.
Sebeok TA. In what sense is language a ‘primary modeling system’? In: Broms H, Kaufmann R, editors. Semiotics of culture: proceedings of the 25th symposium of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics, Imatra, Finland, 27th–29th July, 1987. Helsinki: Arator; 1988. p. 67–80.
Sebeok TA. A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991c.
Sebeok TA. Nonverbal communication. In: Cobley P, editor. The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge; 2001a.
Sebeok TA. Global semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2001b.
Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J. “You Know My Method”: a juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Bloomington: Gaslight Publications; 1980.
Sonesson G. Pictorial concepts: inquiries into the semiotic heritage and its relevance for the analysis of the visual world. Lund: Lund University Press/Chartwell-Bratt; 1989.
Stern D. Diary of a baby. New York: Basic Books; 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cobley, P. (2016). Freedom, Repression and Constraints. In: Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0858-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-0858-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-024-0857-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-024-0858-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)