Advertisement

The Natural Subject

  • Paul Cobley
Chapter
  • 364 Downloads
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 15)

Abstract

As well as its insights into what it is to be human, biosemiotics also re-formulates what it is to be a human subject. It upsets notions regarding the distinction between collectivity and the individual that have contributed to common sense in the modern world and especially since the French Revolution (see Siedentop 2015). Arguments regarding the human subject have been part of the burgeoning literature of ‘identity studies’ in the last 25 years. In the modern literature in this area, there is often a tension between what is referred to as ‘selfhood’ and what is understood as ‘subjectivity’ (cf. Atkins 2005: 1–2). The former, broadly, involves a conception of the human as conscious of its own existence and most of its intellectual capacities as well as its distinction from others; the latter, generally, has come to mean the human as constituted by the range of ‘practices’ which precede its existence and subsequently – or ‘always already’ – shape its existence, thought processes and options. Such practices are ‘cultural’ in their bearing or, more pointedly, signifying practices. What has probably become axiomatic in much of the writing on identity, the subject and the self in modernity is that subjectivity and selfhood are synonymous mainly because they are no longer considered to be unitary or intrinsically constituted in character (see Benhabib 1992; Cascardi 1992; Giddens 1991; Taylor 1992). Elliot writes (2001: 2):

Keywords

Code Duality Digital Code Real Relation Continental Philosophy Symbolic Reference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Althusser L. For marx. Trans. Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books; 1969.Google Scholar
  2. Atkins K. Introduction. In: Atkins. editor. Self and subjectivity. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005.Google Scholar
  3. Belsey C. Culture and the real. London: Routledge; 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Benhabib S. Situating the self: gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Cambridge: Polity; 1992.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner JS. Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton; 1957.Google Scholar
  6. Bruner JS. The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1960.Google Scholar
  7. Bruner JS. Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Belknap; 1966.Google Scholar
  8. Cascardi AJ. The subject of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cobley P. Metaphysics of wickedness. In: Thellefsen T, Sørensen B, editors. Peirce in his own words. Berlin: de Gruyter; 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Deacon TW. The hierarchic logic of emergence: untangling the interdependence of evolution and self-organization. In: Weber BH, Depew DJ, editors. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  11. Deacon TW. Incomplete nature: how mind emerged from matter. New York: Norton; 2012a.Google Scholar
  12. Deely J. The human use of signs, or elements of anthroposemiotics. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield; 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Deely J. Purely objective reality. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton; 2009a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donald M. Origins of the modern mind. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott A. Concepts of the self. Cambridge: Polity; 2001.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity; 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Harris R. Saussure and his interpreters. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffmeyer J. Some semiotic aspects of the psycho-physical relation: the endo-exosemiotic boundary. In: Sebeok TA, Umiker-Sebeok J, editors. The semiotic web 1991: biosemiotics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1992. p. 101–22.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmeyer J. The swarming cyberspace of the body. Cybern Hum Know. 1995;3(1):16–25.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffmeyer J. Signs of meaning in the universe. Trans. Barbara J. Haveland, Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1996.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffmeyer J. Surfaces inside surfaces. On the origin of agency and life. Cybern Hum Know. 1998;5:33–42.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmeyer J. Order out of indeterminacy. Semiotica. 1999;127(1–4):321–44.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffmeyer J. Semiotic scaffolding of living systems. In: Marcello B, editor. Introduction to biosemiotics. Berlin: Springer; 2007. p. 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoffmeyer J. Biosemiotics. An examination into the signs of life and the life of signs. Scranton: Scranton University Press; 2008a.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffmeyer J, editor. A legacy for living systems: Gregory Bateson as a precursor to biosemiotics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008b.Google Scholar
  26. Hoffmeyer J. Semiotic freedom: an emerging force. In: Davis P, Gregersen NH, editors. Information and the nature of reality. From physics to metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010a. p. 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoffmeyer J, Kull K. Baldwin and biosemiotics: what intelligence is for. In: Weber BH, Depew DJ, editors. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  28. Hoffmeyer J, Emmeche, C. Code-duality and the semiotics of nature. Revised version. In Biosemiotics: information, codes and signs in living systems. Marcello Barbieri, editor. New York: Nova; 2007.Google Scholar
  29. Kull K. A brief history of biosemiotics. In: Barbieri M, editor. Biosemiotics: information, codes and signs in living systems. New York: Nova; 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Petrilli S, Ponzio A. Semiotics unbounded: interpretive routes through the open network of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  31. Pinker S. The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 2003.Google Scholar
  32. Ponzio A. The I questioned: Emmanuel Levinas and the critique of occidental reason. Subj Matter. 2006a;3(1):1–45Google Scholar
  33. Ponzio A. The dialogic nature of sign. Trans. Susan Petrilli, New York: Legas; 2006b.Google Scholar
  34. Sebeok TA. Perspectives in zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton; 1972.Google Scholar
  35. Sebeok TA. Ecumenicalism in semiotics. In: Sebeok, editor. A perfusion of signs. Bloomington/London: Indiana University Press; 1977.Google Scholar
  36. Sebeok TA. The semiotic self. In: The sign and its masters, Austin: University of Texas Press; 1979a.Google Scholar
  37. Sebeok TA. I think I am a verb: more contributions to the doctrine of signs. New York: Plenum Press; 1986a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sebeok TA. In what sense is language a ‘primary modeling system’? In: Broms H, Kaufmann R, editors. Semiotics of culture: proceedings of the 25th symposium of the Tartu-Moscow School of Semiotics, Imatra, Finland, 27th–29th July, 1987. Helsinki: Arator; 1988. p. 67–80.Google Scholar
  39. Sebeok TA. A sign is just a sign. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1991c.Google Scholar
  40. Sebeok TA. Global semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 2001b.Google Scholar
  41. Siedentop L. Inventing the individual: the origins of western liberalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 2015.Google Scholar
  42. Stjernfelt F. Diagrammatology. An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007.Google Scholar
  43. Taylor C. Sources of the self: the making of modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  44. Tomasello M, Carpenter M, Call J, Behne T, Moll H. Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2005;28:675–91.Google Scholar
  45. Weber BH, Depew DJ, editors. Evolution and learning: the Baldwin effect reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  46. Wood DJ, Bruner JS, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Child Psychiatry Psychol. 1976;17(2):89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Cobley
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Distinguished Visiting Professor, School of Foreign Languages and CulturesNanjing Normal UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.President of the International Association for Semiotic Studies; and Professor in Language and Media, School of Media and Performing ArtsMiddlesex UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations