Abstract
At this stage of the site characterization some geotechnical data has already been obtain which may include soil and rock samples, STP blow counts, and RQD values. Geophysical logging data has provided additional geotechnical details from borings. Some laboratory analysis may have been made on selected samples from borings. With a refined conceptual model of conditions in hand, the engineering measurements and monitoring is now focused upon obtaining very site-specific measurements and data to address specific engineering questions and quantify additional engineering parameters. This is a broad range of measurement types and data. Within this chapter, we will focus specifically on the engineering measurements and monitoring of subsidence and collapse. We summarize some of the common methods for measuring and monitoring land subsidence and potential collapse, cover the general applications, some considerations and provide a few examples. As always, each technique or measurement has an associated scale of measurement, advantages and limitations.While the many details for making these geotechnical measurements are beyond the scope of this book, further details can be found in Dunicliff (1988), Hunt (2005) and by specialty conferences (DiMaggio and Osborn 2007) who all provide a solid foundation for these types of measurements. Due to the advances that continue to occur in geotechnical instrumentation this information should be supplemented with recent manufacturers literature and recommendations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Anderson N, Welch D (2000) Practical applications of time domain reflectometry (TDR) to monitor and analyze soil and rock slopes. In: Marr WA (ed) Geotechnical measurements lab and field, ASCE GeoDenver, Reston, Virginia, pp 65–79
ASTM (2012) Standard test method for water content and density of soil in situ by time domain reflectometry (TDR) D6780/D6780M-12. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
ASTM (2014a) Standard test methods for crosshole seismic testing, D4428M-14. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
ASTM (2014b) Standard test methods for downhole seismic testing, D7400-14. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
Bawden GW et al (2003) Measuring human-induced land subsidence from space. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 069-03, December
Benson RC (2001) Strategies of site characterization and risk management. A presentation to National Research Council, committee on coal waste impoundment failures subcommittee on impoundment site characterization, National Research Council, Washington, DC
Boston Survey Consultants (BSC) (1990) Design and analysis of the subsidence monitoring network at forest view landfill. Consultants report, Boston, Massachusetts
Brink ABA (1984) A brief review of the South African sinkhole problem. In: Beck BF (ed) Proceedings of the 1st multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes: their geology, engineering and environmental impact, Orlando, FL. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 123–127
Da Cunha AP (ed) (1990) Scale effects in rock masses. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on scale effects in rock masses. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 3–27
DiMaggio J, Osborn P (eds) (2007) Field measurements in geomechanics. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium, Boston, MA, 24–27 September 2007, ASCE Geo-Institute, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 175
Doctor DH, Doctor KZ (2012) Spatial analysis of geologic and hydrologic features relating to sinkhole occurrence in Jefferson County, West Virginia. Carbonates and evaporites, Special Issue on Integrating Science and Engineering to Solve Karst Problems Part I June 27(2):143–152
Doctor DH et al (2008) Bedrock structural controls on the occurrence of sinkholes and springs in the northern Great Valley Karst, Virginia and West Virginia. In: Yuhr L, Alexander CE Jr, Beck BF (eds) Proceedings of the 11th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst, ASCE Geo-Institute, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 183, pp 12–22
Dowding CH, O’Connor KM (2000) Comparison of TDR and inclinometers for slope monitoring. ASCE GeoDenver, Colorado
Dunnicliff J (1988) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley, New York
Goodman WM et al (2009) Two-dimensional seismic evaluation of the I&W brine cavern, Carlsbad, New Mexico. RESPEC Consulting and Services, Topical Report RSI-2083. http://www.emnrd.state.nm.us/OCD/documents/RSI2083.pdf
Hunt RE (2005) Geotechnical engineering investigation handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Land L, Veni G (2012) Electrical resistivity surveys of anthropogenic karst phenomena, southeastern New Mexico. Geology 34(4):117–125
O’Connor KM, Dowding CH (1999) Geo measurements by pulsing TDR cables and probes. CRC Press, Boca Raton
O’Connor KM et al (2001) Real time monitoring of subsidence along I-70 in Washington and Pennsylvania. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1772, pp 32–39
Wair BR et al (2012) Guidelines for estimation of shear wave velocity profiles, PEER report 2012/08. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkley, 68p
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benson, R.C., Yuhr, L.B. (2016). Engineering Measurements and Monitoring. In: Site Characterization in Karst and Pseudokarst Terraines. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9924-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9924-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9923-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9924-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)