Skip to main content

Engineering Measurements and Monitoring

  • Chapter

Abstract

At this stage of the site characterization some geotechnical data has already been obtain which may include soil and rock samples, STP blow counts, and RQD values. Geophysical logging data has provided additional geotechnical details from borings. Some laboratory analysis may have been made on selected samples from borings. With a refined conceptual model of conditions in hand, the engineering measurements and monitoring is now focused upon obtaining very site-specific measurements and data to address specific engineering questions and quantify additional engineering parameters. This is a broad range of measurement types and data. Within this chapter, we will focus specifically on the engineering measurements and monitoring of subsidence and collapse. We summarize some of the common methods for measuring and monitoring land subsidence and potential collapse, cover the general applications, some considerations and provide a few examples. As always, each technique or measurement has an associated scale of measurement, advantages and limitations.While the many details for making these geotechnical measurements are beyond the scope of this book, further details can be found in Dunicliff (1988), Hunt (2005) and by specialty conferences (DiMaggio and Osborn 2007) who all provide a solid foundation for these types of measurements. Due to the advances that continue to occur in geotechnical instrumentation this information should be supplemented with recent manufacturers literature and recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson N, Welch D (2000) Practical applications of time domain reflectometry (TDR) to monitor and analyze soil and rock slopes. In: Marr WA (ed) Geotechnical measurements lab and field, ASCE GeoDenver, Reston, Virginia, pp 65–79

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2012) Standard test method for water content and density of soil in situ by time domain reflectometry (TDR) D6780/D6780M-12. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2014a) Standard test methods for crosshole seismic testing, D4428M-14. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2014b) Standard test methods for downhole seismic testing, D7400-14. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden GW et al (2003) Measuring human-induced land subsidence from space. US Geological Survey Fact Sheet 069-03, December

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC (2001) Strategies of site characterization and risk management. A presentation to National Research Council, committee on coal waste impoundment failures subcommittee on impoundment site characterization, National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Boston Survey Consultants (BSC) (1990) Design and analysis of the subsidence monitoring network at forest view landfill. Consultants report, Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink ABA (1984) A brief review of the South African sinkhole problem. In: Beck BF (ed) Proceedings of the 1st multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes: their geology, engineering and environmental impact, Orlando, FL. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha AP (ed) (1990) Scale effects in rock masses. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on scale effects in rock masses. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 3–27

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio J, Osborn P (eds) (2007) Field measurements in geomechanics. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium, Boston, MA, 24–27 September 2007, ASCE Geo-Institute, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 175

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctor DH, Doctor KZ (2012) Spatial analysis of geologic and hydrologic features relating to sinkhole occurrence in Jefferson County, West Virginia. Carbonates and evaporites, Special Issue on Integrating Science and Engineering to Solve Karst Problems Part I June 27(2):143–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Doctor DH et al (2008) Bedrock structural controls on the occurrence of sinkholes and springs in the northern Great Valley Karst, Virginia and West Virginia. In: Yuhr L, Alexander CE Jr, Beck BF (eds) Proceedings of the 11th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst, ASCE Geo-Institute, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 183, pp 12–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding CH, O’Connor KM (2000) Comparison of TDR and inclinometers for slope monitoring. ASCE GeoDenver, Colorado

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunnicliff J (1988) Geotechnical instrumentation for monitoring field performance. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman WM et al (2009) Two-dimensional seismic evaluation of the I&W brine cavern, Carlsbad, New Mexico. RESPEC Consulting and Services, Topical Report RSI-2083. http://www.emnrd.state.nm.us/OCD/documents/RSI2083.pdf

  • Hunt RE (2005) Geotechnical engineering investigation handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Land L, Veni G (2012) Electrical resistivity surveys of anthropogenic karst phenomena, southeastern New Mexico. Geology 34(4):117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor KM, Dowding CH (1999) Geo measurements by pulsing TDR cables and probes. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor KM et al (2001) Real time monitoring of subsidence along I-70 in Washington and Pennsylvania. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1772, pp 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wair BR et al (2012) Guidelines for estimation of shear wave velocity profiles, PEER report 2012/08. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkley, 68p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benson, R.C., Yuhr, L.B. (2016). Engineering Measurements and Monitoring. In: Site Characterization in Karst and Pseudokarst Terraines. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9924-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics