Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Surface Geophysical Methods

  • Chapter
Site Characterization in Karst and Pseudokarst Terraines

Abstract

We now have a work plan that is based upon regional and local existing data and possibly some site-specific data. A conceptual model has been developed and focuses our attention on what we know, what we need to know and what we might expect on site. As we begin to acquire on-site data using surface geophysical methods, we will begin to test the conceptual model. Their primary benefit is that of greatly increasing the data density over the site, which improves the definition of background and anomalous conditions. These measurements allow us to more accurately locate invasive measurements based upon data rather than guesses thereby improving the chances of accurately defining geologic conditions.

This section provides an introduction to the many surface geophysical methods. We have focused on considerations for their use and how to select methods rather than how to make the measurements. In addition, a large number of examples showing their application are provided to show how these methods can be used in a site characterization effort.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson N, Ismail A (2003) A generalized protocol for selecting appropriate geophysical techniques. Geophysical Technologies for detecting Underground Coal Mine Voids Forum, Lexington, KY

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson N et al (2003) Selection of appropriate techniques: a generalized protocol based on engineering objectives and site characteristics. Presented at the 3rd international conference on applied geophysics, Orlando, FL, 8–11 Dec 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong FE, Heemstra RJ (1973) Radiation halos and hydrocarbon reservoirs: a review. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, Information Circular 8579

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2007) Standard guide for the use of the time domain electromagnetic method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D6820-02. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2008) Standard guide for using the frequency domain electromagnetic method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D6639-01. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2010a) Standard practice for expedited site characterization of vadose zone and ground water contamination at hazardous waste contaminated sites. Designation: D6235-04. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2010b) Standard guide for using the gravity method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D6430-99. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2010c) Standard guide for using the direct current resistivity method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D6431-99. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2010d) Standard guide for using the seismic reflection method for shallow subsurface investigation. Designation: D7128-05. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2011a) Standard guide for using the seismic refraction method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D5777-00. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2011b) Standard guide for using the surface ground penetrating radar method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D6432-11. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2011c) Standard guide for selecting surface geophysical methods. Designation: D6429-99. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (2011d) Standard guide for using the metal detection method for subsurface investigation. Designation: D7046-11. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Atekwana EA et al (2002) Geophysical investigation of vadose zone conductivity anomalies at a hydrocarbon contaminated site: implications for the assessment of intrinsic bioremediation. JEEG 7(3):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banwell GM, Parizek RR (1986) Potential for permeability characterization of crustal fracture zones using helium-4 and radon-222 concentrations in groundwater and soil gas. Geologic Society of America program with abstracts, Boulder, CO, 18(6)534

    Google Scholar 

  • Beam P et al (1997) Lessons learned, a brief history of site characterization. HazWaste World/Superfund XVIII, Washington, DC, 2–4 Dec 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC (1997) ESC: just another new acronym or maybe something meaningful. Environ Eng Geosci 3(3):453–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC, Yuhr LB (1987) Assessment and long term monitoring of localized subsidence using ground penetrating radar. In: Beck BF, Wilson WL (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the environmental impacts of karst, karst hydrogeology: engineering and environmental applications. Orlando, FL. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 161–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC, Yuhr L (1992) A summary of methods for locating and mapping fractures and cavities with emphasis on the geophysical methods. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the application of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, EEGS, Chicago, IL, 26–29 Apr 1992, vol 2, pp 471–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC, Yuhr L (1996) An introduction to geophysical techniques and their applications for engineers and project managers, short course. Presented at SAGEEP, 28 Apr 1996, Keystone, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC, Yuhr L (1997) An overview of the geophysical methods for geotechnical and environmental site characterization. Presented at ASCE GeoLogan conference, Logan, UT, July

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC et al (1984) Geophysical techniques for sensing buried wastes and waste migration. US EPA Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas. Contract No. 68-03-3050

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson R et al (1985) Correlation between field geophysical measurements and laboratory water sample analysis. Presented at National Water Well Association and Environmental Protections Agency 2nd national conference on surface and borehole geophysical methods in groundwater investigations, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC et al (1998) ESC: how it differs from current state of the practice. In: Symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, EEGS, Wheatridge, CO, pp 531–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson RC et al (2003) Some considerations for selection and successful application of surface geophysical methods. In: 3rd international conference on applied geophysics, geophysics 2003, Orlando, FL, pp 8–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogle FR, Loy K (1995) The application of thermal infrared thermography in the identification of submerged springs in Chickamaunga Reservoir, Hamilton County Tennessee. In: Beck BF (ed) Proceedings of the 5th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst: karst geohazards, Gatlinburg, TN. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 415–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger HR (1992) Exploration geophysics of the shallow subsurface. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler DK (1977) Proceedings of symposium on detection on subsurface cavities. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler DK (1980) Microgravity techniques for geotechnical applications. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Paper GL-80-13

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler DK (1994) Detection and delineation of subsurface cavities, tunnels and mines. Am Soc Civil Eng Ill Sect Geotech Lect Ser 3:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler DK (ed) (2005) Near-surface geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysics, Investigations in geophysics No. 13, Tulsa, OK

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler DK (2008) Detection and characterization of subsurface cavities, tunnels and abandoned mines. In: Xia J (ed) Near-surface geophysics and human activity. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics (ICEEG). Science Press USA, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, pp 578–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell CW, Singer M (2001) Application of thermography to groundwater monitoring at Arnold Air Force Base, Tennessee. In: Barry BF, Herring JG (eds) Proceedings of the 8th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst: geotechnical and environmental applications of karst geology and hydrology, Louisville, KY, pp 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy DP et al (2001) The effects of LNAPL biodegradation products on electrical conductivity measurements. JEEG 6(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caterpillar (1988) Handbook of ripping, 8th edn. Caterpillar Inc., Peoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Chardy A (2014) Port tunnel dream finally becomes reality. Miami Herald, Sunday 18th May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio (2007) Commentary: advancements and disappointments in geo-engineering and geo-construction – a 30–year reflection. Geo-Strata July-August, p 12, 13, 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Senate (2010) Interim report 2011-104 December. Committee on banking and insurance, issues relating to sinkhole insurance

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin AG et al (1981) Foundation considerations in sitting of nuclear facilities in karst terrains and other areas susceptible to ground collapse. U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Vicksburg Miss. Prepared for U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission NUREG/CR-2062

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman VK (1968) Geology of the Comstock-Indian Wells Area, Val Verde, Terrell and Brewster Counties, Texas. USGS Professional Paper 594-k

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse J et al (1995) An introduction to application of surface geophysics in environmental investigations. A short course presented a the symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, environmental and engineering geophysical society, Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen D (1975) Geological applications manual for portable gamma ray spectrometers. Exploranium, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann RD, DeHan RS (2007) Microgravity mapping of karst conduits within the Woodville Karst Plain of North Florida. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, environmental and engineering geophysical society, April, Denver, CO, pp 1517–1526

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid T et al (2005) Quantitative groundwater tracing and effective numerical modeling in karst: an example from the Woodville Karst Plain of North Florida. In: Beck B (ed) Proceedings of the 10th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst, vol 144. ASCE Geo-Institute Geotechnical Special Publication, San Antonio, pp 114–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid T et al (2012) Demonstrating interconnection between a wastewater application facility and a first magnitude spring in a karstic watershed: tracer study of the southeast Farm Wastewater Reuse Facility, Tallahassee, FL. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Geological Survey Report of Investigation No. 111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvil GL (1989) Geotechnical evaluation of potential hazards to shuttle landing operations on Rogers Dry Lakebed Edwards Air Force Base, California. Astronaut Office NASA Lyndon B Johnson Space Center, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvil G et al (1992) Fishing for fissures. The Military Engineer Jan–Feb, pp 66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Llopis JL et al (2005) Tunnel detection along the southwest US Border. In: Proceedings of the symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, environmental and engineering geophysical society, pp 430–443

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann DM et al (1997) Setting the standard for geophysical surveys in site investigation. In: McCann DM et al (eds) Modern geophysics in engineering geology, Geologic Society London, Engineering Geology Special Publication No. 12:3–34, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsom J, Eriksen A (2013) Field geophysics, 4th edn, The geological field guide series. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK, Kavazanjian E Jr (2007) Geoengineering engineering for the 21st century. ASCE Geo-Institute, Geo-Strata July/August, pp 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (2000) Seeing into the earth, non-invasive characterization of the shallow subsurface for environmental and engineering application. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Diehl J (ed) (2000) The use of geophysical methods in construction. ASCE GeoInstitute Special Publication Number 108, Reston, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhoeft GR (2003) Quality control in geophysics. Geophysical technologies for detecting underground coal mine voids form, 28–30 July 2003, Lexington, KY

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauck WA et al (1998) High conductivities associated with an LNAPL plume imaged by integrated geophysical techniques. JEEG 2(3):203–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders W et al (1999) Selecting surface geophysical methods for geological, hydrological, geotechnical, and environmental investigations: the rational for the ASTM provisional guide, ASTM D 6429-99(2011). In: Durham GM, Marr WA (eds) Proceedings for field instrumentation for soil and rock, ASTM STP 1358, 18–19 June 1998, Atlanta, GA, pp 392–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt W (2005) Geological and geotechnical investigation procedures for evaluation of the causes of subsidence damage in Florida. Florida Geologic Survey Special Publication No. 57, FGS Tallahassee, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma PV (1997) Enviromental and engineering geophysics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson JB et al (2003) Environmental investigation of a diesel spill in a karst area of Kentucky. In: Barry BF (ed) Proceedings of the 9th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst, ASCE Geo-Institute Geotechnical Special Publication No. 122, pp 415–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Straley D (2008) How thermal imaging of caves got its start. NSS News 66(5):16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Technos, Inc. (1988) Final report, ground penetrating radar investigation of the shuttle landing zone, Rogers Dry Lakebed, Edwards Air Force Base, California. Prepared for NASA’s National space transportation system, June, Consultants report

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J, Marvin M (2006) Experimental research using thermography to locate heat signatures from caves. In: Proceedings of 17th national cave and karst management symposium, Albany, NY, November, pp 102–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Titcomb EP Jr, Keeton JM (1984) Sinkhole activity in the vicinity of the Sunny Point, NC Military Ocean Terminal. In: Beck BF (ed) Proceedings of the 1st multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes: their geology, engineering and environmental impact, Orlando, FL. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 344–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch SB et al (1987) Spatial and temporal controls on gross-alpha radiation, central Florida phosphate district, natural radiation in Florida. In: Proceedings of Natural Radiation and Technologically Enhanced Natural Radiation in Florida, Clearwater, Florida, pp 50–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward SW (ed) (1990) Geotechnical and environmental geophysics. Investigations in Geophysics No. 5, Society of Exploration Geophysics Tulsa, Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward AW et al (1992) Geologic setting of east Antelope Basin with emphasis on fissuring on Rogers Lake, Edwards Air Force Base, Mojave Desert, California. In: Prince KR et al (eds) US Geological Survey Subsidence Interest Group Conference, Edwards Air Force Base, Antelope Valley, California, USGS Open File Report 94-532, pp 35–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley RJ (1983) Recent developments in the application of geophysics to geotechnical investigations. In: Ervin M (ed) In-situ testing for geotechnical investigations. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 87–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Wightman WE et al (2003) Applications of geophysical methods to highway related problems. Federal Highway Administration, Publication No. FHWA-IF-04-021, Lakewood, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisenbaker M et al (2007) Explorers connect America’s longest underwater cave to Wakulla Springs. NSS News 65(12):4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuhr L (1998) Managing data and its integrity in the ESC process, Symposium on the application of geophysics to environmental and engineering problems, EEGS, 22–26 Mar 1998, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuhr L et al (1993) Characterization of karst features using electromagnetics and microgravity: a strategic approach. In: Symposium on the applications of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Englewood, CO, pp 209–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuhr L et al (2008) Mapping and drilling of conduits within the Woodville Karst Plain of North Florida. In: Yuhr LB, Alexander EC Jr, Beck BF (eds) Proceedings of the 11th multidisciplinary conference on sinkholes and the engineering and environmental impacts of karst. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 183, pp 340–350

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technos, Inc., Miami, FL, USA

    Richard C. Benson & Lynn B. Yuhr

Authors
  1. Richard C. Benson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lynn B. Yuhr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benson, R.C., Yuhr, L.B. (2016). Surface Geophysical Methods. In: Site Characterization in Karst and Pseudokarst Terraines. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9924-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation