Abstract
The chapter explores the case of Hashima Island, Japan, an abandoned coal mining facility that was closed down in 1974. Through the narrative of Ott Kadarik, an Estonian architect who visited the island in January 2011, the text explores how traces of the past and ideas of the future combine in the subjective perception of a ruined urban landscape. Embodiment and the senses have received limited attention in heritage studies. In its affective and personal dimensions, heritage highlights not the institutionalised heritage, narrativised as spectacle, but rather the individual perception of participants and the creation of subjective stories—that is, the knowledge how to participate, to see and hear the landscape. Drawing on Hetzler’s concept of ruin time, I propose that the affective meaning of ruined time adds a dimension of value to heritage sites—and that perceptions of rupture or ruptured landscapes influence creativity. For Kadarik, embodied involvement in the ruptured landscape inspired creative ways of seeing: the text examines his responses to the ruined milieu, including his emotions, professional interest and reflections on vernacular architecture, economies of planning, population density and the sociality of urban environments. The ruined environment of Hashima reveals layers of interpretation that unfold from a “ruined” or “interrupted” present towards new histories—and futures. Through a strong sense of embodied experience, the affective rupture of ruins may in turn influence future perceptions of other urban landscapes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbosa A (2010) Meaning and sense in images and texts. Vis Anthropol 234:299–310
Bender B (2002) Time and landscape. Curr Anthropol 43:103–112
Brumann C (2009) Outside the glass case: the social life of urban heritage in Kyoto. Am Ethnol 362:276–299
Bruner JS (2006) Past and present as narrative constructions. In: Staub J (ed) Narration, identity, and historical consciousness. Berghahn Books, New York, pp 25–43
Crawford D (1983) Nature and art: some dialectical relationships. J Aesthet Art Crit 421:49–58
Dakin S (2003) There’s more to landscape than meets the eye: towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. Can Geogr/Le Géographe Canadien 472:185–200
Edensor T (2005) Waste matter—the debris of industrial ruins and the disordering of the material world. J Mater Cult 103:311–332
Gibson L, Pendlebury J (eds) (2009) Valuing historic environments: heritage, culture and identity. Ashgate, Farnham
Graham B, Howard P (2008) Heritage and identity. In: Graham B, Howard P (eds) The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 1–15
Gregory D (2011) Above the dead cities. In: Daniels S, DeLyser D, Entrikin J, Richardson D (eds) Envisioning landscapes, making worlds: geography and the humanities. Routledge, London, pp 12–24
Gunkel C (2009) Geisterstadt im Ozean. Accessed 26 Apr 2014
Harrison R (2012) Heritage: critical approaches. Routledge, London
Hartog F (2005) Time and heritage. Mus Int 573:7–18
Hetzler M (1988) Causality: ruin time and ruins Florence. Leonardo 211:51–55
Jackson JB (1980) The necessity for ruins: and other topics. The University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst
Jóhannesdóttir GR (2010) Landscape and aesthetic values: not only in the eye of the beholder. In: Benediktsson K, Lund K (eds) Conversations with landscape. Ashgate, Farnham, pp 109–123
Jones R, Birdsall-Jones C (2008) The contestation of heritage: the coloniser and the colonised in Australia. In: Daniels S, DeLyser D, Entrikin J, Richardson D (eds) The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 365–380
Kadarik O (2011) Gunkanjima. Maja 167:18–19
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett B (1995) Theorising heritage. Ethnomusicology 393:367–380
Kress G (2010) Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London
Lardner H (2010) Hashima Island, Japan—a crucible for considering the heritage of industrial communities. Paper presented at ICOMOS annual conference, 22–25 April, Broken Hill. http://www.aicomos.com/2010-outback-and-beyond/program/breakout-abstracts/hashima-island-japan-–-a-crucible-for-considering-the-heritage-of-industrial-communities/. Accessed 26 Apr 2014
Lowenthal D (1998) The heritage crusade and the spoils of history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mah A (2010) Memory, uncertainty and industrial ruination: Walker riverside, Newcastle upon Tyne. Int J Urban Reg Res 342:398–413
Nellhaus T (1998) Signs, social ontology, and critical realism. J Theory Soc Behav 281:1–24
Pellitero AM (2011) The phenomenological experience of the visual landscape. In: Nijhuis S, van Lammeren R, van der Hoeven F (eds) Exploring the visual landscape. Advances in physiognomic landscape research in the Netherlands, vol 2, Research in Urbanism Series. Ios Press, Amsterdam, pp 57–71
Pickles J (ed) (1985) Phenomenology, science and geography: spatiality and the human science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schlögel K (2003) Im Raume lesen wir die Zeit: Über Zivilisationsgeschichte und Geopolitik. Carl Hanser Verlag, München
Soper K (2010) Unnatural times? The social imaginary and the future of nature. Sociol Rev 57:222–235
Stan A (2013) Re-reading the landscape: for a new humanist dimension of the landscape concept. In: Newman C, Nussaume Y, Pedroli B (eds) Landscape and imagination: towards a new baseline for education in a changing world. Bandecchi and Vivaldi, Florence, pp 117–122
Wagner J (2006) Visible materials, visualised theory and images of social research. Vis Stud 211:55–69
Waterton E, Watson S (eds) (2010) Culture, heritage and representation. Ashgate, Farnham
Widgren M (2004) Can landscapes be read? In: Palang H, Sooväli H, Antrop M, Setten G (eds) European rural landscapes: persistence and change in a globalising environment. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 455–465
Zuker P (1961) Ruins—an aesthetic hybrid. J Aesthet Art Crit 202:119–130
Internet Sources (Accessed April 26 2014)
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the European Regional Development Fund (Centre of Excellence in Cultural Theory), the Estonian Ministry of Education targeted financing project SF0130033s07, Landscape Practice and Heritage and the Estonian Research Agency project IUT 3-2, Culturescapes in transformation: towards an integrated theory of meaning making. My thanks to Ott Kadarik for permission to use the photos.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kasemets, K. (2015). Affect, Rupture and Heritage on Hashima Island, Japan. In: Sooväli-Sepping, H., Reinert, H., Miles-Watson, J. (eds) Ruptured Landscapes. Landscape Series, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9903-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9903-4_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9902-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9903-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)