Advertisement

Employment, Empowerment, and Spousal Violence on Women in Developing Countries

  • Yoo-Mi ChinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

Although female labor force participation is expected to empower women and enhance their well-being, it could generate unintended consequences, especially where the prevailing culture considers female employment a challenge to male dominance. The existing empirical studies in developing countries suggest that female employment tends to increase the risk of spousal violence against them, rather than improving their bargaining power. However, the existing studies are limited in that their conclusions are often based on correlational, not causal, inference. More studies are needed that exploit exogenous variations in female work status to identify a clear-cut causal relationship between their employment and spousal violence. At the same time, policies that promote female empowerment through employment should take a sophisticated approach that can minimize cultural resistance.

Keywords

Female labor force participation Empowerment Capabilities Well-being Spousal violence Marital bargaining Male backlash 

References

  1. Agarwal, B., & Panda, P. (2007). Toward freedom from domestic violence: The neglected obvious. Journal of Human Development, 8(3), 359–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847–1859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, M., & Greenstein, T. (2005). For women, breadwinning can be dangerous: Gendered resource theory and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1137–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardhan, P. (1974). On life and death questions. Economic and Political Weekly, 9(32–34), 1293–1304.Google Scholar
  5. Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1029–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boserup, E. (1970). Women’s role in economic development. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, L., Thurman, T., Bloem, J., & Kendall, C. (2006). Sexual violence in Lesotho. Studies in Family Planning, 37(4), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burazeri, G., Roshi, E., Jewkes, R., Jordan, S., Bjegovic, V., & Laaser, U. (2005). Factors associated with spousal physical violence in Albania: Cross sectional study. BMJ, 331(7510), 197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chin, Y. (2011). Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction? Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25(1), 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalal, K. (2011). Does economic empowerment protect women from intimate partner violence? Journal of Injury and Violence Research, 3(1), 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dude, A. (2007). Intimate partner violence and increased lifetime risk of sexually transmitted infection among women in Ukraine. Studies in Family Planning, 38(2), 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (1999). Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: The effects of changing domesticity, Women’s status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies, 3(3), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dugan, L., Nagin, D. S., & Rosenfeld, R. (2003). Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law & Society Review, 37(1), 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovits (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Edleson, J. L. (1999). Children’s witnessing of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(8), 839–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eswaran, M., & Malhotra, N. (2011). Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: Theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 44(4), 1222–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1997). An economic analysis of domestic violence. Review of Social Economy, 55(3), 337–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fukuda-Parr, S. (2003). The human development paradigm: Operationalizing sen’s ideas on capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goetz, A. M., & Gupta, R. S. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power, and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hindin, M. J., Kishor, S., & Ansara, D. L. (2008). Intimate partner violence among couples in 10 DHS countries: Predictors and health outcomes (DHS analytical studies No. 18). Calverton: Macro International Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Hornung, C. A., McCullough, B. C., & Sugimoto, T. (1981). Status relationships in marriage: Risk factors in spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43(3), 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Indian National Science Academy, Chinese Academy of Sciences. (2001). Growing populations, changing landscapes: Studies from India, China, and the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kalmuss, D. S., & Straus, M. A. (1982). Wife’s marital dependency and wife abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(2), 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinsley, S. (1977). Women’s dependency and federal programs. In J. R. Chapman & M. Gates (Eds.), Women into wives: The legal and economic impact of marriage (pp. 79–91). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Kishor, S., & Johnson, K. (2004). Profiling domestic violence – A multi-country study. Calverton: ORC MACRO.Google Scholar
  26. Kishor, S., & Neitzel, K. (1996). The status of women: Indicators for twenty-five countries (DHS comparative studies No. 21). Calverton: Macro International Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Krishnan, S., Rocca, C. H., Hubbard, A. E., Subbiah, K., Edmeades, J., & Padian, N. S. (2010). Do changes in spousal employment status lead to domestic violence? Insights from a prospective study in Bangalore, India. Social Science and Medicine, 70(1), 136–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luke, N., & Munshi, K. (2011). Women as agents of change: Female income and mobility in India. Journal of Development Economics, 94(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Macmillan, R., & Gartner, R. (1999). When she brings home the bacon: Labor force participation and the risk of spousal violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 947–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mbiti, I. (2008). Monsoon wedding?: The effect of female labor demand on marriage markets in India. Mimeo Southern Methodist University.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, B. D. (1981). The endangered sex: Neglect of female children in rural North India. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Molm, L. D. (1989). Punishment power: A balancing process in power-dependence relations. American Journal of Sociology, 94(6), 1392–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nussbaum, M. C. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Panda, P., & Agarwal, B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33(5), 823–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pitt, M.M., & Khandker, S.R. (1998). The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 958–996.Google Scholar
  36. Qian, N. (2008). Missing women and the price of tea in China: The effect of sex-specific income on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1251–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rocca, C. H., Rathod, S., Falle, T., Pande, R. P., & Krishnan, S. (2009). Challenging assumptions about women’s empowerment: Social and economic resources and domestic violence among young married women in urban South India. International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(2), 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1982). Female power, autonomy and demographic change in the third world. In R. Anker, M. Buvinic, & N. H. Youssef (Eds.), Women’s roles and population trends in the third world (pp. 117–132). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  39. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2013). Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? American Economic Review, 103(3), 598–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2009). Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf. Accessed 24 June 2013.
  41. Tauchen, H. V., Witte, A. D., & Long, S. K. (1991). Domestic violence: A non-random affair. International Economic Review, 32(2), 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tumwesigye, N. M., Kyomuhendo, G. B., Greenfield, T. K., & Wanyenze, R. K. (2012). Problem drinking and physical intimate partner violence against women: Evidence from a national survey in Uganda. BMC Public Health. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-399.Google Scholar
  43. Vyas, S., & Watts, C. (2009). How does economic empowerment affect women’s risk of intimate partner violence in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published evidence. Journal of International Development, 21, 577–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, M. I., & Daly, M. (1996). Male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(1), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Health Organization (WHO). (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes, and women’s responses. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baylor UniversityWacoUSA

Personalised recommendations