Advertisement

Gendered Ideology, Male Dominance and Women’s Microcredit Participation in Rural Bangladesh

  • K. M. Rabiul KarimEmail author
  • Chi Kong Law
Chapter
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

This study examines the influences of gender ideology on women’s microcredit participation mediated through household male dominance in rural Bangladesh. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 342 randomly selected married men in five northwest villages. Almost 52 % of married women were microcredit-participants (loan-borrowers). However, in 81 % of the cases, the loans were fully controlled by their husbands. The study indicates that low socioeconomic status influences women’s nominal microcredit participation while patriarchal gender ideology constrains them from active microcredit participation (using the loans). It appears that the negative influence of patriarchal ideology on women’s active microcredit participation is mediated through high household male dominance. It is suggested that microcredit intervention should address patriarchal ideology by creating an environment where people may have a chance to rethink the importance of women’s socioeconomic roles and rights.

Keywords

Gender ideology Household Male dominance Microcredit participation Bangladesh 

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. M., Chowdhury, M., & Bhuiya, A. (2001). Microcredit and emotional well-being: Experience of poor rural women from Matlab, Bangladesh. World Development, 29(11), 1957–1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baden, S., Green, C., Goetz, A. M., & Guhathakurta, M. (1994). Background report on gender issues in Bangladesh (No. 26). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bograd, M. (1988). Feminist perspectives on wife abuse: An introduction. In K. Yllö & M. Bograd (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on wife abuse (pp. 11–26). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2009). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS 14, 15 and 16: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Cain, M., Khanam, S. R., & Nahar, S. (1979). Class, patriarchy, and women’s work in Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 5(3), 405–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung, G. H., Tucker, M. B., & Takeuchi, D. (2008). Wives’ relative income production and household male dominance: Examining violence among Asian American enduring couples. Family Relations. Minneapolis, 57(2), 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1977–1978). Wives: The appropriate victims of marital violence. Victimology, 2(3–4), 426–442.Google Scholar
  10. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  11. Field Survey (2009). Sample survey by author of married men. Rajshahi, Bangladesh: University of Rajshahi.Google Scholar
  12. Fink, A. (2003). How to sample in surveys (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Goetz, A. M., & Gupta, R. S. (1996). Who takes the credit? Gender, power, and control over loan use in rural credit programs in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldson, A. C. (2005). Patriarchal ideology and frequency of partner abuse among men in batterer treatment groups. Miami: Florida International University.Google Scholar
  15. Hadi, A. (2001). Promoting health knowledge through micro-credit programmes: Experience of BRAC in Bangladesh. Health Promotion International, 16(3), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Haque, M. M., & Kusakabe, K. (2005). Retrenched men workers in Bangladesh – A crisis of masculinity. Gender, Technology and Development, 9(2), 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Herr, N. R. (2006). Mediation with dichotomous outcomes. http://nrherr.bol.ucla.edu/Mediation/logmed.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2010.
  19. Hossain, F. (2002). Small loans, big claims. Foreign Policy, 132, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt, J., & Kasynathan, N. (2002). Reflections on microfinance and women’s empowerment. Development Bulletin, 57, 71–75.Google Scholar
  21. Kabeer, N. (1990). Poverty, purdah and women’s survival strategies in rural Bangladesh. In H. Bernstein, B. Crow, M. Mackintosh, & C. Martin (Eds.), The food question: Profit verses people? (pp. 134–147). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency and achievements: Reflection on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kabeer, N. (2001). Conflicts over credit: Re-evaluating the empowerment potential of loans to women in rural Bangladesh. World Development, 29(1), 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karim, K. M. R. (2006). Men’s arrack drinking and domestic violence against women in a Bangladesh village. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 25(4), 367–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karim, K. M. R., & Law, C. K. (2013). Gender ideology, microcredit participation and women’s status in rural Bangladesh. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33(1/2), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kenny, D. A. (2009). Mediation. http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm. Accessed 11 Dec 2010.
  27. Kidwai, R. (2001). Domestic violence in Pakistan: The role of patriarchy, gender roles, the culture of honor and objectification/commodification of women. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Alliant International University, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Kramarae, C. (1992). The condition of patriarchy. In C. Kramarae & D. Spender (Eds.), The knowledge explosion: Generation of feminist scholarship. London: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kroska, A. (2007). Gender ideology and gender role ideology. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology [electronic resources]. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Lerner, G. (1986). The creation of patriarchy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mackinnon, D. P., & Dwyer, J. H. (1993). Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review, 17(2), 144–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mahjabeen, R. (2008). Microfinancing in Bangladesh: Impact on households, consumption and welfare. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30(6), 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mann, C. J. (2003). Observational research methods. Research design II: Cohort, cross sectional, and case-control studies. Emergency Medicine Journal, 20(1), 54–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maxim, P. S. (1999). Quantitative research methods in the social sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Meade, J. (2010). An examination of the microcredit movement. http://www.connexions.org/CxLibrary/Docs/CX6992-MeadeMicrobank.htm. Accessed 21 July 2011.
  36. Pal, M. S. (2001). Country briefing paper—Women in Bangladesh (No. 020401): Programs Department (West). Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Quisumbing, A. R., & Briere, B. D. L. (2000). Women’s assets and intrahousehold allocation in rural Bangladesh: Testing measures of bargaining power. Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  38. Rahman, A. (1999). Women and microcredit in rural Bangladesh: An anthropological study of Grameen Bank lending. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  39. Salt, R. J. (2010). Exploring women’s participation in a U.S. Microcredit program. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 42(3), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schieber, R., & Thompson, J. (1996). Development risk factors for childhood pedestrian injuries. Injury Prevention Journal, 2(3), 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., Riley, A. P., & Akhter, S. (1996). Credit programs, patriarchy and men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 43(12), 1729–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schuler, S. R., Hashemi, S. M., & Badal, S. H. (1998). Men’s violence against women in rural Bangladesh: Undermined or exacerbated by microcredit programmes? Development in Practice, 8(2), 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schuler, S. R., Bates, L. M., & Islam, F. (2008). Women’s rights, domestic violence, and recourse seeking in rural Bangladesh. Violence Against Women, 14(3), 326–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schurmann, A. T., & Johnston, H. B. (2009). The group-lending model and social closure: Microcredit, exclusion, and health in Bangladesh. Journal of Health, Population, & Nutrition, 27(4), 518–527.Google Scholar
  45. Spence, J. T., & Hahn, E. D. (1997). The attitude toward women scale and attitude change in college students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  47. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973). A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 219–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. UNDP, U. N. D. P. (2008). Human development report 2007/2008: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
  49. Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  50. Yllo, K. A. (1983). Sexual equity and violence against wives in American sates. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 14(Spring), 67–86.Google Scholar
  51. Yllo, K. A. (1993). Through a feminist lens: Gender, power, and violence. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 47–62). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Yunus, M. (1994). Grameen Bank, as I see it. Dhaka: The Grameen Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkUniversity of RajshahiRajshahiBangladesh
  2. 2.Department of Social Work and Social AdministrationThe University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations