Opting In: Women in Search of Well-Being

  • Ingrid BieseEmail author
  • Linda McKie
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)


In this contribution to the handbook we consider the concept of ‘opting in’. Opting in is a process through which women seek ways of working on their own terms and creating alternative definitions of success, placing priority on the well-being of themselves and their family. Our analysis and arguments challenge the contemporary and lively debates on ‘opting out’ which have been dominated by debates about women who leave their careers altogether to be with their children. We examine the experiences of professional women who choose to leave high-level careers to pursue specific interests, through the case studies of four women from Finland and the United States. For these women, opting in has involved a journey to new lifestyles where work and other areas of life can be combined, where they have more power over their time, and where they can achieve a sense of coherence, which in turn enhances their well-being.


Women Work Well-being Health Career Family Relationships Reinvention Case studies 



The authors would like to thank Lidia Galabova, Technical University, Sofia, Bulgaria for her insightful comments on the varied and multi-faceted meanings of success for professional men and women.


  1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: Gender, class and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruch, Y. (2004). Transforming careers: From linear to multidimensional career paths. Organizational and individualized perspectives. Career Development International, 9, 58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in modern social order (pp. 1–55). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Belkin, L. (2003, October 26). The opt-out revolution. The New York Times Sunday Magazine, Sec 6, 42.Google Scholar
  7. Benn, M. (1998). Madonna and child: Politics of modern motherhood. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  8. Boushey, H. (2005). Are women opting out? Debunking the myth. Center for Economic and Policy Research, Briefing Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Boushey, H. (2008). ‘Opting out?’ The effect of children on women’s employment in the United States. Feminist Economics, 14, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burrows, G. (2013). Men can do it. Croydon: NGO Media.Google Scholar
  11. Crompton, R. (2001). Gender, comparative research and biographical matching. European Societies, 3(2), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durbin, S., & Tomlinson, J. (2010). Female part-time managers: Networks and career mobility. Work, Employment and Society, 24(4), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott, A. (2013). Reinvention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Elliott, A., & Lemert, C. (2006). The new individualism: The emotional costs of globalization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Frosh, S., Phoenix, A., & Pattman, R. (2003). The trouble with boys. The Psychologist, 16, 84–87.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1994). Living in a post-traditional society. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in modern social order (pp. 55–109). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1999). Runaway world: How globalisation in reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  18. Hirschman, L. (2006). Get to work: A manifesto for women of the world. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Hofmeister, H., Blossfeld, H.-P., & Mills, M. (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and women’s mid-career life courses: A theoretical framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld & H. Hofmeister (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and women’s careers: An international comparison (pp. 3–31). Gloucester: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  20. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, B. D. (2012). Introduction: Women, work, and motherhood in American history. In B. D. Jones (Ed.), Women who opt out: The debate over working mothers and work-family balance (pp. 3–30). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Josselson, R. (1995). Imagining the real: Empathy, narrative and the dialogic self. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.), The narrative study of lives (Vol. 3, pp. 24–27). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Jyrkinen, M., & McKie, L. (2012). Gender, age and ageism: Experiences of women managers in two EU countries. Work, Employment and Society, 26(1), 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerber, L. (1980). Women of the republic: Intellect and ideology in voluntary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lane, R. E. (2000). The loss of happiness in market democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Laverty, K. J. (1996). Economic “short-termism”: The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research. The Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 825–860.Google Scholar
  27. Lyly-Yrjänäinen, M., & Fernández Macías, E. (2009). Women mangers in hierarchical structures in working life. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Condition. Accessed 17 Feb 2012.
  28. Mainiero, L. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2006). The opt-out revolt: Why people are leaving companies to create kaleidoscope careers. Mountain View: Davies Black Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Maynard, D., & Feldman, D. (2011). Underemployment: Psychological, economic and social challenges. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKie, L., & Callan, S. (2012). Understanding families: A global introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. McKie, L., Biese, I., & Jyrkinen, M. (2013). “The best time is now!”: The temporal and spatial dynamics of women opting in to self-employment. Gender, Work and Organization, 20(2), 184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, D. C., & Salkind, N. J. (2002). Handbook of research design and social measurement (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Misra, J. (2012). Care work and women’s employment: A comparative perspective. In B. Jones (Ed.), Women who opt out: The debate over working mothers and work-family balance (pp. 137–147). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012, May 23–24). Gender equality in education, employment and entrepreneurship: Final Report to the Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris.Google Scholar
  35. Parent-Thirion, A., Fernández Macías, E., Hurley, J., & Vermeylen, G. (2007). Fourth European work conditions survey. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Accessed 25 Jan 2010.
  36. Percheski, C. (2008). Opting out? Cohort differences in professional women’s employment rates from 1960 to 2005. American Sociological Review, 73(3), 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ragin, C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  39. Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Statistics Finland. (2013, June). Labour Force Survey. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.
  41. Stone, P., & Hernandez, L. A. (2012). The rhetoric and reality of opting out: Toward a better understanding of professional women’s decisions to head home. In B. D. Jones (Ed.), Women who opt out: The debate over working mothers and work-family balance (pp. 33–56). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Stone, P., & Lovejoy, M. (2004). Fast-track women and the “choice” to stay home. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596, 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sturges, J. (2013). A matter of time: Young professionals’ experiences of long work hours. Work Employment & Society, 27(2), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sullivan, S., & Mainiero, L. (2007). Women’s kaleidoscope careers: A new framework for examining women’s stress across the lifespan. In P. Perrewé & D. Ganster (Eds.), Exploring the work and non-work interface (Research in occupational stress and well-being, Vol. 6, pp. 205–238). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tomlinson, J. (2011). Gender equality and the state: A review of recent EU developments’, Special issue: Bringing the state back in? The state and human resource management. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18), 3755–3774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walby, S., Armstrong, J., & Humphreys, L. (2008). Review of equality statistics. Equality and Human Rights Commission. Accessed 1 Aug 2013.
  47. Warner, J. (2005). Perfect madness: Motherhood in the age of anxiety. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, C. L. (1991). Case studies and the sociology of gender. In A. Orum et al. (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 224–244). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, J., & Boushey, H. (2010). Three faces of work-family conflict. The poor, the professionals and the missing middle. Washington, DC: Center for WorkLifeLaw.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, J. C., Manvell, J., & Bornstein, S. (2006). ‘Opt-out’ or pushed out?: How the press covers work/family conflict, work life law report. San Francisco: UC Hastings College of the Law.Google Scholar
  51. Wolf, A. (2013). The XX factor: How working women are creating a new society. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  52. World Health Organisation. (1946). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and OrganizationHanken School of EconomicsHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.School of Applied Social SciencesDurham UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations