Advertisement

Family and Labor Market Policies in Germany: The Well-Being of Working Women

  • Jessica K. CampEmail author
  • Eileen Trzcinski
  • Stella Resko
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

In Germany, women’s participation in the labor market has historically differed from that of men. Despite recent efforts on the part of the federal government to support policies that encourage labor force participation for women, large gender gaps in employment remain. This chapter explores the way historical and cultural trends have led to the differences in labor market status for women in Germany and discusses recent policies that have influenced women’s participation in the labor market. The German Socio-economic Panel (SOEP) is used to examine the trends in women’s labor force participation in relationship to their well-being. Different measures of global satisfaction including: life, work, child care, and health are examined. Results show that women have become much more likely to participate in the labor market, but also reveal that these effects are not the same for all women. Rather, policies that have encouraged labor market participation have differed between women who have experienced more privilege within the labor market compared to those who are less privileged. Implications for women’s labor market connection and well-being is discussed.

Keywords

Women Labor force participation Germany Work Well-being 

References

  1. Asef, D. & Wingerter, C. (2011). Arbeitsmarkt. In Datenreport 2011: Ein Sozailberich für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Band I (pp. 97–108). Berlin: Statistisches Bundesamt; Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
  2. Bardasi, E., & Gornick, J. C. (2000). Women and part-time employment: Workers ‘choices’ and wage penalties in five industrialized countries (Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper, 223).Google Scholar
  3. Bardasi, E., & Gornick, J. C. (2008). Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across countries. Feminist Economics, 14(1), 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), S33–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bosch, G., & Kalina, T. (2008). Low-wage work in Germany: An overview. In G. Bosch & C. Weinkopf (Eds.), Low-wage work in Germany (pp. 19–112). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bundesagentur für Arbeit. (2012a). Arbeitsmarkt 2011. Nurnburg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit.Google Scholar
  7. Bundesagentur für Arbeit. (2012b). Frauen und Männer am Arbeitsmarkt im Jahr 2011. Nurnburg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit Google Scholar
  8. Bundesagentur für Arbeit. (2012c). März ist internationaler frauentag: Starke frauen – Starke Wirtschaft. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.arbeitsagentur.de/nn_27044/zentraler-Content/Pressemeldungen/2012/Presse-12-008.html
  9. Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. (2012). Vierter Zwischenbericht zur Evaluation des Kinderförderungsgesetzes. Retrieved from http://www.bmfsfj.de/BMFSFJ/Service/publikationen,did=196786.html
  10. Burkhauser, R. V., Duncan, G. J., Hauser, R., & Berntsen, R. (1991). Wife or frau, women do worse: A comparison of men and women in the United States and Germany after marital dissolution. Demography, 28(3), 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Busch, A., & Holst, E. (2009). Glass ceiling effect and earnings: The gender pay gap in managerial positions in Germany. Discussion papers German Institute for Economic Research, 905.Google Scholar
  12. Cooke, L. P., & Gash, V. (2010). Wives’ part-time employment and marital stability in Great Britain, West Germany and the United States. Sociology, 44(6), 1091–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornell University. (2011). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study 1984–2009: English Package.Google Scholar
  14. Cornell University. (2013). English user package. Retrieved from http://www.human.cornell.edu/pam/research/centers-programs/german-panel/english-user-package.cfm.
  15. D’Acci, L. (2010). Measuring well-being and progress. Social Indicators Research, 104(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung. (2013). About SOEP. Retrieved on September 9, 2012, from http://www.diw.de/en/diw_02.c.221178.en/about_soep.html
  17. Diener, E., Inglehard, R., & Tay, L. (2012). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. Google Scholar
  18. Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures (Centre for Economic Performance special papers). London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  19. Dougherty, C. (2005). German unemployment reaches 12.6 %. New York Times, Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/02/business/worldbusiness/02jobless.html?_r=0
  20. Duggan, L. (1995). Restacking the deck: Family policy and women’s fall-back position in Germany before and after unification. Feminist Economics, 1(1), 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2012). The 2012 Aging Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 27 EU Member States (2010–2060). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2012/pdf/ee-2012-2_en.pdf
  23. Eurostats. (2012). Europe in figures: Eurostat yearbook 2011. Retrieved September 15, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
  24. Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth. (2011). Shaping sustainable family time policy: Towards a better balance between work and caring responsibilities. Berlin: Bundesministerium fur Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.Google Scholar
  25. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. (2012). Social security at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.bmas.de/EN/Service/Publications/social-security-at-a-glance-365.html
  26. Fleckenstein, T. (2008). Restructuring welfare for the unemployed: The Hartz legislation in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 18, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gash, V., Mertens, A., & Gordo, R. L. (2012). The influence of changing hours of work on women’s life satisfaction. The Manchester School, 80(1), 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geisler, E., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2012). How policy matters: Germany’s Parental Leave Benefit reform and fathers’ behavior 1999–2009. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research Working Paper, 2012 (021).Google Scholar
  29. Gießelmann, M., & Lohmann, H. (2008). The different roles of low-wage work in Germany: Regional, demographical and temporal variances in the poverty risk of low-paid workers. In H. Andreß & H. Lohmann (Eds.), The working poor in Europe: Employment, poverty and globalization (pp. 96–123). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Gobel, J. (2012a). SOEP documentation codebook: Person level questionnaires. Retrieved from http://panel.gsoep.de/~urahmann/codebook_p.pdf.
  31. Gobel, J. (2012b). SOEP documentation codebook: Generated variables- personal level. Retrieved from http://panel.gsoep.de/~urahmann/codebook_pgen.pdf
  32. Gottschall, K., & Bird, K. (2003). Family leave policies and labor market segregation in Germany: Reinvention or reform of the male breadwinner model? The Review of Policy Research, 20(1), 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guenther, K. M. (2010). Making their place: Feminism after socialism in East Germany. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Frick, J. R. (2005). Desktop companion to the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP). Retrieved from http://www.diw.de/documents/dokumentenarchiv/17/diw_01.c.38951.de/dtc.409713.pdf
  35. Henninger, A., Wimbauer, C., & Dombrowski, R. (2008). Demography as a push toward gender equality? Current reforms of German family policy. Social Politics, 15(3), 287–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hohmeyer, K. (2009). Effectiveness of one-euro-jobs: Do programme characteristics matter? IAB Discussion Paper, 2009(20).Google Scholar
  37. Hohmeyer, K., & Wolff, J. (2012). A fistful of Euros: Is the German on-euro job workfare scheme effective for participants? International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Holst, E. (2005). Women managers: Enormous deficit in large companies and employers’ associations. DIW Weekly Report, 4(1), 57–67.Google Scholar
  39. Holst, E., & Trzcinski, E. (2003). High satisfaction among mothers who work part-time. Economic Bulletin, 40(10), 327–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kraft, K., & Neimann, S. (2009). Effect of labor division between wife and husband on the risk of divorce: Evidence from German data. IZA Discussion Papers, 2009(4515).Google Scholar
  41. Krause, M. U., & Uhlig, H. (2012). Transitions in the German labor market: Structure and crisis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 59, 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kreisen, N. (2012). Elterngeld fur geburten 2010. Berlin: Statistisches Bundesamt; Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
  43. Kühhirt, M., & Ludwig, V. (2012). Domestic work and the wage penalty for motherhood in West Germany. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Misra, J., Moller, S., & Budig, M. J. (2007). Work-family policies and poverty for partnered and single women in Europe and North America. Gender and Society, 21(6), 804–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ochel, W. (2005). Hartz IV: Welfare to work in Germany. CESifo DICE Report, 2005, (2).Google Scholar
  46. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Reilly, J., & Bothfeld, S. (2002). What happens after working part time? Integration, maintenance or exclusionary transitions in Britain and western Germany. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26, 409–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2011). Doing better for families. Retrieved online on September 9, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/social/family/doingbetter
  49. Ostner, I. (2010). Farewell to the family as we know it: Family policy change in Germany. German Policy Studies, 6(1), 211–244.Google Scholar
  50. Pailhé, A., & Solaz, A. (2012). The influence of employment uncertainty on childbearing in France: A tempo or quantum effect? Demographic Research, 26(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poortman, A. (2005). Women’s work and divorce: A matter of anticipation? A research note. European Sociological Review, 21(3), 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pötzsch, O. (2011). Kinderlosigkeit. In Datenreport 2011: Ein Sozailberich für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Band I (pp. 42–44). Berlin: Statistisches Bundesamt; Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.Google Scholar
  53. Reich, N. (2010). Who cares? Determinants of the fathers use of parental leave in Germany (Hamburg Institute of International Economics Working Paper No. 1–31). Hamburg: University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  54. Ronicke, P. (2012). Hartz IV (Arbeitslosengeld II) nach dem SGB II. Retrieved August 9, 2012, from http://www.sozialleistungen.info/hartz-iv-4-alg-ii-2/
  55. Schulz, E. (2010). The long-term care system in Germany (Discussion Papers German Institute for Economic Research, 1039).Google Scholar
  56. Socio-economic Panel (SOEP). (2010). 95% sample: Data for years 1984–2009 version 26. SOEP. Berlin, DE: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  57. Spakes, P. (1995). Women, work, and babies: Family-labor market policies in three European countries. Affilia, 10(4), 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009). Germany’s population by 2060: Results of the 12th coordinated population projection. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Publications/Specialized/Population/GermanyPopulation2060.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
  59. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2012c). Parental allowance, children’s allowance. [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/SocialStatistics/SocialBenefits/ParentalAllowance/Current.html
  60. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2012d). 25,4 % der unter 3-Jährigen in Kindertagesbetreuung- geringerer Anstieg in 2011 Destatis. Wiesbaden: author. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/Soziales/Sozialleistungen/KinderJugendhilfe/Aktuell_Kindertagesbetreuung.html;jsessionid = 471A87CBF409D3BD641D1CA63396EB8C.cae2
  61. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Population movement: Births and deaths. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/EN/FactsFigures/SocietyState/Population/Births/Tables/BirthDeaths.html
  62. Summers, S. E. (2012). Reconciling family and work: The West German gendered division of labor and women’s emancipation, 1960s to 1980s. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from gradworks.umi.com. (3512696).Google Scholar
  63. Teachman, J. (2010). Wives’ economic resources and risk of divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 31(10), 1305–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thyrian, J. R., Fendrich, K., Lange, A., Hass, J., Zygmunt, M., & Hoffmann, W. (2010). Changing maternity leave policy: Short-term effects on fertility rates and demographic variables in Germany. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 672–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Trzcinski, E. (2000). Family policy in Germany: A feminist dilemma? Feminist Economics, 6(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Trzcinski, E., & Camp, J. K. (2013). Family policy in Germany. In M. Robila (Ed.), Family policies across the globe. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Trzcinski, E., & Holst, E. (2012). Gender differences in subjective well-being in and out of management positions. Social Indicators Research, 107, 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica K. Camp
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eileen Trzcinski
    • 2
  • Stella Resko
    • 2
  1. 1.Social Work DepartmentUniversity of Michigan-FlintFlintUSA
  2. 2.School of Social WorkWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations