Still Alone at the Table? Women Working in Technology Organizations

  • Marilyn DruryEmail author
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)


Women working in information technology (IT) organizations experience a variety of challenges related to traditionally male dominated IT organizational cultures. As competition for IT staff has become global, IT organizations must realize that a great source for staff can be found in women. Unfortunately, the gendered elements of organizations, particularly IT environments, tend to promote male traditions, processes, and environments. Organizations must start reducing barriers, becoming more diverse, and invest in creating opportunities for women to enter and succeed in IT professions. Women seeking IT careers and advancement must understand gendered hegemonies and pursue actions to address and overcome challenges they encounter so they are no longer alone at the table.


Information technology Gendered organizations Computing jobs Mentor Sponsor Recruiting women Retaining women Diversity Barriers Obstacles Opportunities Technology 


  1. Acker, J. (1993). Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. In J. S. Glazer, E. M. Bensimon, & B. K. Townsend (Eds.), Women in higher education: A feminist perspective (pp. 81–95). Needham Heights: Ginn Press. (Reprinted from Gender and Society, 4(2), June 1990)Google Scholar
  2. Ashcraft, C., Eger, E., & Friend, M. (2012). Girls in IT: The facts (NCWIT report). Retrieved from Accessed 3 Sept 2012.
  3. Aspray, W., & Freeman, P. A. (2002). The supply of IT workers in the United States. In B. L. Hawkins, J. A. Rudy, & W. H. Wallace (Eds.), Technology everywhere: A campus agenda for educating and managing workers in the digital age (pp. 3–23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Ausejo, L. (1993). Women administrators’ emerging personal and professional concerns. In P. T. Mitchell (Ed.), Cracking the wall: Women in higher education administration (pp. 71–87). Washington, DC: The College and University Personnel Association.Google Scholar
  5. Auster, E. R. (1993, Summer). Demystifying the glass ceiling: Organizational and interpersonal dynamics of gender bias. Business & The Contemporary World, 5, 4768.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, L. J., & Aspray, W. (2006). The state of research on girls and IT. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 3–54). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barsh, J., & Yee, L. (2011, April). Unlocking the full potential of women in the U.S. economy. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from Accessed 5 Oct 2011.
  8. Bechky, B. A. (2003, November). Object lessons: Workplace artifacts as representations of occupational jurisdiction [Electronic Version]. American Journal of Sociology, 109(3), 720–752.Google Scholar
  9. Beninger, A., & Carter, N. (2013). The great debate: Flexibility vs. face time. Retrieved from Accessed 25 Sept 2013.
  10. Brown, W. A. (2006). CIO effectiveness in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 29(1), 48–53.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, W. (2013). The chief information officer in higher education, 2013 reports (Research report). Albany: Center for Higher Education Chief Information Officer Studies, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). Occupational outlook handbook, 2012–13 edition, projections overview. Retrieved from Accessed 30 Sept 2013.
  13. Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2011). The myth of the ideal worker: Does doing all the right things really get women ahead? Retrieved from Accessed 30 Aug 2012.
  14. Catalyst. (2013, March 8). High tech employment in the U.S.: Women and men employed in select high tech occupations in the U.S., 2012. Retrieved from Accessed 30 Sept 2013.
  15. Chapple, K. (2006). Low-income women, short-term job training programs, and IT careers. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation (pp. 439–470). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clark, E. (2013, September). Gender diversity among higher education CIOs (Research report). Louisville: EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. Retrieved from Accessed 25 Sept 2013.
  17. Collins, P. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of black feminist thought [electronic version]. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cozza, M. (2011). Bridging gender gaps, networking in computer science. Gender, Technology and Development, 15(2), 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Csorny, L. (2013, April). Careers in the growing field of information technology services. Beyond the Numbers: Employment & Unemployment, 2(9), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from Accessed 5 Oct 2013.
  20. Drury, M. (2010). You gotta be determined to get in there: Voices of women higher education technology leaders. The Journal of Women in Educational Leadership, 8(2), 59–80.Google Scholar
  21. Drury, M. (2011). Women technology leaders: Gender issues in higher education information technology. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 4(1), 96–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  23. Flax, J. (1983). Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: A psychoanalytic perspective on epistemology and metaphysics. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 245–281). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. Foust-Cummings, H., Sabattini, L., & Carter, N. (2008). Women in technology: Maximizing talent, minimizing barriers. Retrieved from Accessed 15 Mar 2012.
  25. Foust-Cummings, H., Dinolfo, S., & Kohler, J. (2011). Sponsoring women to success. Retrieved from Accessed 15 Mar 2012.
  26. Gang, V. (2013, September 7). Women want work-life balance more than a big paycheck. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Sept 2013.
  27. Gillenwater, S. (2012). F-250 female chief information officers approaching 20%. Retrieved from Accessed 10 Apr 2012.
  28. Gropp, R. E. (2006). National academy of sciences issues gender equity plan. BioScience, 56(11), 888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, K., Morello, D., & Raskino, M. (2007, March 20). Women and men in IT: Breaking through sexual stereotypes (Research Report ID#: G00146320). Retrieved from Accessed 9 June 2008.
  30. Hartsock, N. C. (1983). The feminist standpoint: Developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 283–310). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  31. Hewlett, S. A., & Luce, C. B. (2005, March). Off-ramps and on-ramps: Keeping talented women on the road to success. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 22–24.Google Scholar
  32. Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., & Servon, L. J. (2008, June). Stopping the exodus of women in science. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 22–24.Google Scholar
  33. Hymowitz, C., & Schellhardt, T. D. (1986, March 24). The corporate woman (A special report): Cover—The glass ceiling: Why women can’t seem to break the invisible barrier that blocks them from the top jobs [Electronic Version]. The Wall Street Journal, 1.Google Scholar
  34. Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010, September). Why men still get more promotions than women, Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80–85.Google Scholar
  35. Intel. (2010). 2010 corporate responsibility report. Retrieved from Accessed 30 Sept 2013.
  36. Katz, R. N., Kvavik, R. B., Penrod, J. I., Pirani, J. A., Nelson, M. R., & Salaway, G. (Eds.). (2004). Information technology leadership in higher education: The condition of the community. Boulder: Educause Center for Applied Research ECAR.Google Scholar
  37. Kekelis, L. S., Ancheta, R. W., & Heber, E. (2005). Hurdles in the pipeline. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 26(1), 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Maier, M. (1999). On the gendered substructure of organization. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender & work (pp. 69–93). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martin, P. Y. (2003, June). ‘Said and done’ versus ‘saying and doing’: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender and Society, 17(3), 342–366.Google Scholar
  41. Maume, D. J. (1999, November). Glass ceilings and glass escalators: Occupational segregation and race and sex differences in managerial promotions. Work and Occupations, 26(4), 483–509.Google Scholar
  42. Merton, R. K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 9–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nash, H. (2012, May). Harvey Nash CIO Survey 2012. Retrieved from Accessed 10 Sept 2013.
  44. National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Digest of education statistics, 2012: Table 317: Bachelor’s, master’s, and doctor’s degrees conferred by degree-granting institutions, by sex of student and discipline division: 2010–11. Retrieved from Accessed 6 Sept 2013.
  45. NCWIT. (2009, September 30). Women in IT: The facts. Retrieved from Accessed 20 Jan 2011.
  46. NCWIT. (2013, February 27). Women in IT: By the numbers. Retrieved from Accessed 5 Oct 2013.
  47. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  48. Simard, C., & Gammal, D. (2012). Solutions to recruit technical women. Retrieved from Accessed 15 Mar 2013.
  49. Simard, C., Henderson, A. D., Gilmartin, S. K., Schiebinger, L., & Whitney, T. (2008). Climbing the technical ladder: Obstacles and solutions for mid-level women in technology. National Science Foundation Grant #0413538 through NCWIT & Anita Borg Institute for Women and Technology.Google Scholar
  50. Sprague, J., & Zimmerman, M. K. (1993). Overcoming dualisms: A feminist agenda for sociological methodology. In P. England (Ed.), Theory on gender/feminism on theory (pp. 255–280). New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  51. Valian, V. (2006). Beyond gender schemas: Improving the advancement of women in academia. In J. M. Bystydzienski, & S. R. Bird (Eds.), Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (pp. 320–332).Google Scholar
  52. Wasburn, M. H., & Miller, S. G. (2006). Still a chilly climate for women students in technology: A case study. In M. F. Fox, D. G. Johnson, & S. V. Rosser (Eds.), Women, gender, and technology (pp. 60–79). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  53. WIAReport. (2013, October 16). University of Nebraska Omaha seeks to increase women in information technology fields. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Oct 2013.
  54. Williams, C. L. (1992, August). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the “female” professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emeritus, ITS Educational TechnologyUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations