Advertisement

In the Company of Women: The Well-Being Consequences of Working with (and for) Other Women

  • Carol T. KulikEmail author
  • Isabel Metz
  • Jill A. Gould
Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

This chapter explores how women’s well-being in organizational contexts is enhanced – but also diminished – by other women. On the one hand, the relational demography literature, particularly research based on social categorization and social identity theories, suggests that women will be attracted to other women and are likely to advocate on their behalf. On the other hand, the literature on mentoring and leadership provides evidence that women can be disadvantaged by female mentors and supervisors. Further, research based on status characteristics theory suggests that the mere presence of other women may devalue occupations and organizational roles, yet the number of female top managers appears to positively affect subsequent female representation in middle management positions. We review the psychology, sociology and management literatures to produce a better understanding of how social (e.g., societal stereotypes) and structural (e.g., gender composition) factors influence whether the presence of other women has a positive or negative effect on the well-being of working women.

Keywords

Relational demography Sex similarity Well-being Mentoring Supervisor-subordinate relationships Women 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Preparation of this chapter was supported by Australian Research Council Linkage Projects grant LP120200475 in partnership with Aegis and the Australian Senior Human Resources Roundtable.

References

  1. Adebayo, D. O., & Udegbe, I. B. (2004). Gender in the boss-subordinate relationship: A Nigerian study. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25, 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, M., Metz, I., & Kulik, C. T. (2010, August). The impact of gender diversity on turnover: The moderating effect of HR policies and practices. Paper presented at the Academy of Management meetings, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, T. D., & Eby, L. T. (2004). Factors related to mentor reports of mentoring functions provided: Gender and relational characteristics. Sex Roles, 50(1/2), 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amanatullah, E. T., & Tinsley, C. H. (2013). Punishing female negotiators for asserting too much … or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ambrose, M. K., Schminke, M., & Mayer, D. M. (2013). Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: A moderated mediation approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Avery, D. R., McKay, P. F., & Wilson, D. C. (2008). What are the odds? How demographic similarity affects the prevalence of perceived employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Avery, D. R., Wang, M., Volpone, S. D., & Zhou, L. (2013). Different strokes for different folks: The impact of sex dissimilarity in the empowerment-performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 757–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1996). The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service provider role stress, performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 57–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bailyn, L. (2003). Academic careers and gender equity: Lessons learned from MIT. Gender, Work & Organization, 10(2), 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baron, J. N., & Bielby, W. T. (1980). Bringing the firms back in: Stratification, segmentation, and the organization of work. American Sociological Review, 45(5), 737–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., & Kao, C. F. (1991). Detecting and labeling prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(2), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baruch-Feldman, C., Brondolo, E., Ben-Dayan, D., & Schwartz, J. (2002). Sources of social support and burnout, job satisfaction, and productivity. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(1), 84–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Training and development of transformational leadership: Looking to 1992 and beyond. European Journal of Industrial Training, 14(5), 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Bird, C. (1990). High finance, small change. In B. F. Reskin & P. A. Roos (Eds.), Job queues, gender queues (pp. 145–166). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 951–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brickman, P., & Bulman, R. (1977). Pleasure and pain in social comparison. In R. L. Miller & J. M. Suls (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 149–186). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  19. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burke, R. J. (1984). Mentors in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 9, 353–372.Google Scholar
  21. Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1990). Mentoring in organizations: Implications for women. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(4), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burke, R. J., Burgess, Z., & Fallon, B. (2006). Organizational practices supporting women and their satisfaction and well-being. Women in Management Review, 21(5), 416–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Burt, R. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bygren, M. (2010). The gender composition of workplaces and men’s and women’s turnover. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bylsma, W. H., & Major, B. (1992). Two routes to eliminating gender differences in personal entitlement: Social comparisons and performance evaluations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(2), 193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chatman, J. A., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2004). Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chatman, J. A., Polzer, J. T., Barsade, S. G., & Neale, M. A. (1998). Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 749–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chattopadhyay, P., George, E., & Shulman, A. D. (2008). The asymmetrical influence of sex dissimilarity in distributive vs. Colocated work groups. Organization Science, 19(4), 581–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1082–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Choi, J. N. (2007). Group composition and employee creative behaviour in a Korean electronics company: Distinct effects of relational demography and group diversity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Chow, I. H., & Ng, I. (2007). Does the gender of the manager affect who he/she networks with? Journal of Applied Business Research, 23(4), 49–60.Google Scholar
  33. Cohen, L. E., Broschak, J. P., & Haveman, H. A. (1998). And then there were more? The effect of organizational sex composition on the hiring and promotion of managers. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Derks, B., Ellemers, N., van Laar, C., & de Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the queen bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dougherty, T. W., Dreher, G. F., Arunachalam, V., & Wilbanks, J. E. (2013). Mentor status, occupational context, and protégé career outcomes: Differential returns for males and females. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 514–527. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dreher, G. F., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Race, gender, and opportunity: A study of compensation attainment and the establishment of mentoring relationships. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Drexler, P. (2013). The tyranny of the queen bee. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323884304578328271526080496.html
  40. Duffy, M. K., & Ferrier, W. J. (2003). Birds of a feather …? How supervisor-subordinate dissimilarity moderates the influence of supervisor behaviors on workplace attitudes. Group & Organization Management, 28(2), 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Duguid, M. (2011). Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Duguid, M., Loyd, D. L., & Tolbert, P. S. (2012). The impact of categorical status, numeric representation, and work group prestige on preference for demographically similar others: A value threat approach. Organization Science, 23(2), 386–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role analysis. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  44. Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1982). Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 915–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., & Makhijani, M. G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Eby, L. T. (1997). Alternative forms of mentoring in changing organizational environments: A conceptual extension of the mentoring literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51(1), 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Elfenbein, H. A., & O’Reilly, C. A. (2007). Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance. Group & Organization Management, 32(1), 109–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 315–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Elsesser, K. M., & Lever, J. (2011). Does gender bias against female leaders persist? Quantitative and qualitative data from a large-scale survey. Human Relations, 64(12), 1555–1578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Elvira, M. M., & Cohen, L. E. (2001). Location matters: A cross-level analysis of the effects of organizational sex composition on turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 591–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ely, R. J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 203–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 589–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ely, R., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(3), 474–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  58. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Foley, S., Linnehan, F., Greenhaus, J. H., & Weer, C. H. (2006). The impact of gender similarity, racial similarity, and work culture on family-supportive supervision. Group & Organization Management, 31(4), 420–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Foschi, M. (1989). Status characteristics, standards, and attributions. In J. Morris, M. Zelditch Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 58–72). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Frost, P. J. (2007). Toxic emotions at work and what you can do about them. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  62. Genat, A., Wood, R., & Sojo, V. (2012). Evaluation bias and backlash: Dimensions, predictors and implications for organisations. Melbourne: Centre for Ethical Leadership.Google Scholar
  63. Gilbreath, B., & Benson, P. G. (2004). The contribution of supervisor behaviour to employee psychological well-being. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 18(3), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Goldberg, C. B., Riordan, C., & Schaffer, B. S. (2010). Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects. Human Relations, 63(7), 903–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Gould, J. A., Kulik, C. T., & Sardeshmukh, S. (2013, December). Take it from the top: The impact of female directors on female executive representation. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management meeting, Hobart, Australia.Google Scholar
  66. Grant, A. M., Christianson, M. K., & Price, R. H. (2007). Happiness, health, or relationships? Managerial practices and employee well-being tradeoffs. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(3), 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Grissom, J. A., Nichol-Crotty, J., & Keiser, L. (2012). Does my boss’s gender matter? Explaining job satisfactions and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 649–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Guillaume, Y. R. F., Brodbeck, F. C., & Riketta, M. (2012). Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1), 80–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(1), 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ingram, P., & Simons, T. (1995). Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1466–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Jeanquart-Barone, S., & Sekaran, U. (1994). Effects of supervisor’s gender on American women’s trust. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Johnson, N. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1994). The effect of mentoring and sex-role style on male–female earnings. Industrial Relations, 33(2), 263–274.Google Scholar
  74. Joshi, A., Liao, H., & Jackson, S. E. (2006). Cross-level effects of workplace diversity on sales performance and pay. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Kanter, R. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2000). Workplace bullying and sickness absence in hospital staff. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57(10), 656–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Konrad, A. M., Cannings, K., & Goldberg, C. B. (2010). Asymmetrical demography effects on psychological climate for gender diversity: Differential effects of leader gender and work unit gender composition among Swedish doctors. Human Relations, 63(11), 1661–1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Kray, L. J., & Thompson, L. (2005). Gender stereotypes and negotiation performance: An examination of theory and research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 103–182.Google Scholar
  80. Kulik, C. T., & Bainbridge, H. T. J. (2006). Psychological perspectives on workplace diversity. In A. M. Konrad, P. Prasad, & J. K. Pringle (Eds.), Handbook of workplace diversity (pp. 25–52). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  81. Kulik, C. T., & Holbrook, R. L., Jr. (2000). Demographics in service encounters: Effects of racial and gender congruence on perceived fairness. Social Justice Research, 13(4), 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Kulik, C., & Olekalns, M. (2012). Negotiating the gender divide: Lessons from the negotiation and organizational behavior literatures. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1387–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Kurtulus, F. A., & Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (2012). Do female top managers help women to advance? A panel study using EEO-1 records. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 639(1), 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Lankau, M. J., Riordan, C. M., & Thomas, C. H. (2005). The effects of similarity and liking in formal relationships between mentors and protégés. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 252–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Linehan, M. (2001). Networking for female managers’ career development. Journal of Management Development, 20(10), 823–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2011). Chipping away at the glass ceiling: Gender spillovers in corporate leadership. American Economic Review, 101(3), 635–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Maume, D. J. (2011). Meet the new boss…same as the old boss? Female supervisors and subordinate career prospects. Social Science Research, 40(1), 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Mavin, S. (2006). Venus envy: Problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21(4), 264–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Marinova, S. V. (2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65, 325–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. McGinn, K. L., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). Looking up and looking out: Career mobility effects of demographic similarity among professionals. Organization Science, 24(4), 1041–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. McGuire, W., & McGuire, C. V. (1981). The spontaneous self-concept as affected by personal distinctiveness. In M. D. Lynch & K. Gergen (Eds.), Self-concept: Advances in theory and research (pp. 147–171). New York: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  93. Meece, M. (2009). Backlash: Women bullying women at work. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/business/10women.html?pagewanted=all&_r=1&
  94. Metz, I. (2009). Organisational factors, social factors, and women’s advancement. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Metz, I., & Tharenou, P. (2001). Women’s career advancement: The relative contribution of human and social capital. Group and Organization Management, 26(3), 312–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Miner-Rubino, K., Settles, I. H., & Stewart, A. J. (2009). More than numbers: Individual and contextual factors in how gender diversity affects women’s well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 463–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Moore, S., Grunberg, L., & Greenberg, E. (2005). Are female supervisors good for employee job experiences, health, and wellbeing? Women in Management Review, 20(2), 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Murray, P. A., & Syed, J. (2010). Gendered observations and experiences in executive women’s work. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(3), 277–293.Google Scholar
  99. Ng, C. W., & Chiu, W. C. K. (2001). Managing equal opportunities for women: Sorting the friends from the foes. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(1), 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. O’Brien, K. E., Biga, A., Kessler, S. R., & Allen, T. D. (2010). A meta-analytic investigation of gender differences in mentoring. Journal of Management, 36, 537–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Ostroff, C., & Atwater, L. E. (2003). Does whom you work with matter? Effects of referent group gender and age composition on managers’ compensation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 725–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Page, K. M., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2009). The “what”, “why” and “how” of employee well-being: A new model. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Parker, V. A., & Kram, K. E. (1993). Women mentoring women: Creating conditions for connection. Business Horizons, 36(2), 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Parks-Stamm, E. J., Heilman, M. E., & Hearns, K. A. (2008). Motivated to penalize: Women’s strategic rejection of successful women. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Pelled, L. H., & Xin, K. R. (2000). Relational demography and relationship quality in two cultures. Organization Studies, 21(6), 1077–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Perry, E. L., Davis-Blake, A., & Kulik, C. T. (1994). Explaining gender-based selection decisions: A synthesis of contextual and cognitive approaches. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 786–820.Google Scholar
  107. Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A. (1987). The effect of the proportion of women on salaries: The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Raabe, B., & Beehr, T. A. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ragins, B. R. (1989). Barriers to mentoring: The female manager’s dilemma. Human Relations, 42, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Ragins, B. R. (1997). Diversified mentoring relationships in organizations: A power perspective. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 482–521.Google Scholar
  111. Ragins, B. R. (1999). Gender and mentoring relationships. In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 347–370). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1993). Gender and willingness to mentor in organizations. Journal of Management, 19, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: A comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ragins, B. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1990). Perceptions of mentor roles in cross-gender mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 37(3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Ragins, B. R., & Scandura, T. A. (1994). Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 37(4), 957–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organisations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Reilly, K. T., & Wirjanto, S. (1999). The proportion of females in the establishment: Discrimination, preferences and technology. Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, 25(s1), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Ridgeway, C. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70(2), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18(4), 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Ridgeway, C. L., & Erickson, K. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 579–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Rink, F., & Ellemers, N. (2006). What can you expect? The influence of gender diversity in dyads on work goal expectancies and subsequent work commitment. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 19, 131–173.Google Scholar
  123. Roberson, L., & Kulik, C. T. (2007). Stereotype threat at work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(2), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rosen, L. N., & Martin, L. (1997). Sexual harassment, cohesion and combat readiness in mixed gender U.S. Army units. Armed Forces & Society, 24, 221–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Ryan, K. M., King, E. B., Adis, C., Gulick, L. M. V., Peddie, C., & Hargraves, R. (2012). Exploring the asymmetrical effects of gender tokenism on supervisor-subordinate relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(S1), E56–E1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Schaffer, B. S., & Riordan, C. M. (2013). Relational demography in supervisor-subordinate dyads: An examination of discrimination and exclusionary treatment. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 30(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Schieman, S., & McMullen, T. (2008). Relational demography in the workplace and health: An analysis of gender and the subordinate-superordinate role set. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(3), 286–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Settles, I. H., Cortina, L. M., Stewart, A. J., & Malley, J. (2007). Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(3), 270–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Simon, L. S., Judge, T. A., & Halvorsen-Ganepola, M. D. K. (2010). In good company? A multi-study, multi-level investigation of the effects of coworker relationships on employee well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 534–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Corder, J., & Markham, W. T. (1982). Sex and power in the federal bureaucracy: A comparative analysis of male and female supervisors. Work and Occupations, 9(2), 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Stainback, K., Ratliff, T. N., & Roscigno, V. J. (2011). The context of workplace sex discrimination: Sex composition, workplace culture and relative power. Social Forces, 89(4), 1165–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  136. Tharenou, P. (2005). Does mentor support increase women’s career advancement more than men’s? The differential effects of career and psychosocial support. Australian Journal of Management, 30(1), 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Tolbert, P. S., Simons, T., Andrews, A., & Rhee, J. (1995). The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 562–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Tsui, A. S., & Gutek, B. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  139. Turban, D. B., Dougherty, T. W., & Lee, F. K. (2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  141. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1993). Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs (pp. 23–63). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Wallace, J. E. (2001). The benefits of mentoring for female lawyers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 366–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multi-nation study. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  144. Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. YouTube. (2013). Sexy news anchor Nicole Brewer bitches out weather lady on live TV. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ya1lfbo6oPA

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Melbourne Business SchoolUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations