Skip to main content

Evaluation, Improvement and Guidance for the Use of Local-Scale Emergency Prediction and Response Tools for Airborne Hazards in Built Environments. Cost Action ES100 – A European Experience

  • Conference paper
Nuclear Terrorism and National Preparedness

Abstract

Releases of hazardous agents, such as in a RDD event, in complex built environments pose a tremendous challenge to emergency first responders and authorities in charge due to casualties potentially involved and the significant environmental impact. Air motions in built-up areas are very complex and adequate modelling tools have to be applied properly in order to predict the dispersion of hazardous materials with sufficient accuracy within a very short time. Different types of tools are applied; however, it is not always clear the advantages and limitations of individual models and approaches. Therefore, it is of an exceptional interest to compile a detailed inventory of the different models and methodologies currently in use, to characterize their performance and to establish strategies for their improvement. The Action is a first cross-community initiative to join, to coordinate and to harmonize European efforts for a substantial improvement in the implementation of local-scale emergency response tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baumann-Stanzer K, Leitl B, Trini Castelli S, Milliez M, Rau G, all COST ES1006 Members (2014) Evaluation of local-scale models for accidental releases in built environments – results of the “Michelstadt exercise” in COST Action ES1006. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, Varna, Bulgaria (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  2. COST ES1006 – Background and Justification Document, COST Action ES1006, May 2012. http://www.elizas.eu/images/Publications/costes1006_d1_final_low-res.pdf

  3. Fischer R, Bastigkeit I, Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2010) Generation of spatio-temporally high resolved datasets for the validation of LES-models simulating flow and dispersion phenomena within the lower atmospheric boundary layer. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2010), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gariazzo C, Leitl B, Trini Castelli S, Baumann-Stanzer K, Reisin TG, Barmpas F, Tinarelli G, Milliez CM, Bemporad E, Armand P (2014) COST Action ES1006. Evaluation, improvement and guidance of local-scale emergency prediction and response tools for airborne hazards in built environments: ongoing activities, experiments and recent results. Chem Eng Trans 36:529–534, 2014-CISAP6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hanna S, Chang J (2013) Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation. Meteorog Atmos Phys 116:133–146

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Milliez M, Hellsten A, all COST ES1006 members (2014) Evaluation of dispersion models for improvement and guidance for the use of local-scale emergency response tools; the “Michelstadt” modelling exercise – COST action ES1006. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on Computational Wind Engineering (CWE2014), Hamburg, Germany, 8 p

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tavares R, Baumann-Stanzer K, Leitl B, Trini Castelli S, all COST ES1006 Members (2014) ERMIDT – the Emergency Response Models and Computational Tools Inventory Database developed in the frame of in COST Action ES1006. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, Varna, Bulgaria (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tsiouri V, Trini Castelli S, Andronopoulos S (2013) Qualified datasets for benchmarking local-scale emergency response models for the purpose of disaster management. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, Madrid, Spain, pp 27–32

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trini Castelli S, Leitl B, Baumann-Stanzer K, Reisin TG, Armand P, Barmpas F, Balczo M, Andronopoulos S, Jurcakova K, all COST ES1006 Members (2014) Updates on COST Action ES1006. Evaluation, improvement and guidance for the use of local-scale emergency prediction and response tools for airborne hazards in built environments. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference on harmonisation within atmospheric dispersion modelling for regulatory purposes, Varna, Bulgaria (in press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamir G. Reisin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reisin, T.G. et al. (2015). Evaluation, Improvement and Guidance for the Use of Local-Scale Emergency Prediction and Response Tools for Airborne Hazards in Built Environments. Cost Action ES100 – A European Experience. In: Apikyan, S., Diamond, D. (eds) Nuclear Terrorism and National Preparedness. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9891-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics