Advertisement

Adaptation Tools and Strategies

  • Sebastian Weissenberger
  • Omer Chouinard
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

Adaptation to climate change will be a necessity for coastal zones in decades and even centuries to come. Although adaptation to climate and environmental changes has been a feature of human societies since the evolution of modern humans, current challenges posed by climate change and sea level rise in a crowded and developed world are of a vaster nature of those faced by humanity before and will necessitate new approaches, new techniques and new strategies. A conceptual framework is being developed, centered on the notions of vulnerability, adaptation and resilience. Adaptation to climate change will necessitate international cooperation and coherent strategies, although solutions will need to be developed with respect to local circumstances. The main strategies—protection, accommodation, retreat and precaution, are declined in various tools of technical, scientific, legislative, administrative, social or physical nature.

Keywords

Vulnerability Adaptation Resilience Adaptation strategies Coastal protection 

References

  1. Arlington Group Planning + Architecture Inc., EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd., DE Jardine Consulting, & Sustainability Solutions Group. (2013). Sea level rise adaptation primer: A toolkit to build adaptive capacity on Canada’s South Coasts. Prepared for the British Columbia Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24, 347–364.Google Scholar
  3. Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adger, W. N., Huq, S., Brown, K., Conwaya, D., & Hulme, M. (2003). Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Progress in Development Studies, 3, 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I., & O’Brien, K. L. (2009). Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, Values, Governance (p. 514). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ali, A. M. S. (2005). Rice to shrimp: Land use/land cover changes and soildegradation in Southwestern Bangladesh. Land Use Policy 23, 421–435. Google Scholar
  8. Arp, P., Ogilvie, J., Castonguay, M., Jutras, M.-F., Wen, H. K., Furze, S., et al. (2013). Evaluation hydrological risks using LiDAR mapping. In UNB Wu Conference Centre, Fredricton, May 1.Google Scholar
  9. Bankoff, G., Frerks, G., & Hilhorst, D. (2011). Mapping vulnerability. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  10. Béhar, D. (1997). La politique de la ville mérite-t-elle d’être évaluée? Urbanisme, 55–58.Google Scholar
  11. Béné, C. (2013). Towards a quantifiable measure of resilience. IDS Working Paper 434, IDS, Brighton, UK, 27 p.Google Scholar
  12. Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1998). Linking social and ecological sytems. Management practises and social mechanisms for building resilience (459 p). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bernier, N., MacDonald, J., Ou, J., Ritchie, H., & Thompson, K. (2006). Storm-surge and meteorological modelling. In R. Daigle (Ed.), Impacts de l’élévation du niveau de la mer sur la côte sud-est du Nouveau-Brunswick, Rapport du projet recherche pilote d’Environnement Canada (pp. 263–298).Google Scholar
  14. Billé, R. (2009). Agir mais ne rien changer? De l’utilisation des expériences pilotes en gestion de l’environnement. VertigO Débats et Perspectives. doi: 10.4000/vertigo.8299.Google Scholar
  15. Brooks, N., Anderson, S., Ayers, J., Burton, I., & Tellam, I. (2011). Tracking adaptation and measuring development. IIED Climate Change Working Paper 1.Google Scholar
  16. Büntgen, U., Tegel, W., Nicolussi, K., McCormick, M., Frank, D., Trouet, V., et al. (2011). 2500 years of european climate variability and human susceptibility. Science, 331, 578–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1993). The environment as hazard (290 p). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit. (n.d.) Integriertes Küstenzonenmanagement in Deutschland. http://www.ikzm-strategie.de.
  19. Carron Erosion Study Team. (2009). Carron Point, life in a coastal ecosystem. «Towards a sustainable community plan». Université de Moncton, Fonds de fiducie en environnement du Nouveau-Brunswick.Google Scholar
  20. Cicin-Sain, B., & Knecht, R. W. (1998). Integrated coastal and ocean management. Washington, D. C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  21. Costanza, R., Pérez-Maqueo, O., Martinez, M. L., Sutton, P., Anderson, S. J., & Mulder, K. (2008). The value of coastal wetlands for hurricane protection. Ambio, 37, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. CRDI and DFID. (2012). De nouveaux mécanismes de résilience: Incidences du programme Adaptation aux changements climatiques en Afrique par la recherche et le renforcement des capacities 2006–2012. Ottawa, Canada: CRDI.Google Scholar
  23. Cyrulnik, B., & Seron, C. (Eds.). (2004). La résilience ou comment renaître de sa souffrance. Paris: Fabert.Google Scholar
  24. Dalal-Clayton, B., & Bass, S. (2009). The challenges of environmental mainstreaming: Experience of integrating environment into development institutions and decisions. In Environmental governance (Vol. 3). London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  25. Dankelman, I., Alam, K., Ahmed, W. B., Gueye, Y. D., Fatema, N., & Mensah-Kutin, R. (2008). Gender, climate change and human security: lessons from bangladesh, ghana and senegal. Report prepared by The Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO).Google Scholar
  26. De Vriend, H. J., & Van Koningsveld, M. (2012). Building with nature: Thinking, acting and interacting differently. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: EcoShape, Building with Nature.Google Scholar
  27. De Vries, D. H. (2011). Temporal vulnerability in hazardscapes: Flood memory-networks and referentiality along the North Carolina Neuse River (USA). Global Environmental Change, 21, 154–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. DeBaie, L., Murphy, K., Martin, G., & Chouinard, O. (2006). Socio-economic impacts. In R. Daigle (Ed.). Impacts de l’élévation du niveau de la mer sur la côte sud-est du Nouveau-Brunswick, Rapport du projet recherche pilote d’Environnement Canada (pp. 486–520).Google Scholar
  29. Diamond, J. M. (2005). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed (592 p). New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dixit, Y., Hodell, D. A., & Petrie, C. A. (2014). Abrupt weakening of the summer monsoon in northwest India ~4100 yr ago. Geology, 42, 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Doiron, S. (2012). From climate change plans to by-laws. It’s time to act. Plan Canada, December.Google Scholar
  32. Doiron, S., & Weissenberger, S. (2013). Sustainable dive tourism: Social and environmental impacts—the case of Roatan, Honduras. Tourism Management Perspectives, 10, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dolan, A. H., & Walker, I. J. (2003). Understanding vulnerability of coastal communities to climate change related risks. Journal of Coastal Research, 39, 1317–1324.Google Scholar
  34. Duarte, M., Nadelman, R., Norton, A. P., Nelson, D., & Wolf, J. (2006). Adapting to climate change: Understanding the social dimensions of vulnerability and resilience. Environment Matters Annual Review July 2005–June 2006, 24–27. The World Bank.Google Scholar
  35. Eakin, H., & Luers, A. L. (2006). Assessing the Vulnerability of Social-Environmental Systems. Annual Review Environment Research, 31, 365–394.Google Scholar
  36. Eakin, H., Tompkins, E. L., Nelson, D. R., & Anderies, J. M. (2009). Hidden costs and disparate uncertainties: trade-offs in approaches to climate policy. In W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, & K. L. O’Brien (Eds.), Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, Values, Governance (pp. 212–226). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Eastern Research Group. (2013). What will adaptation cost? An economic framework for coastal community infrastructure. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center.Google Scholar
  38. Elliott, J. R., & Pais, J. (2006). Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research, 35, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Environment Canada. (2006). Impacts of climate change and sea level rise on the coastal zone of southeastern New Brunswick (611 p).Google Scholar
  40. Environment Canada. (2013). Reducing flood damage. http://www.ec.gc.ca/eau-water/default.asp?lang=En&n=72FDC156-1.
  41. European Commission (EC). (2010). Coastal Zone Policy. En ligne: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/iczm/home.htm.
  42. Eyzaguirre, J. (2009). Climate change and Canada: An untapped opportunity to advance gender equality? Canadian Womens’ Health Network, 1, 1 (Fall/Winter 2008/2009).Google Scholar
  43. Feagin, R. A., Mukherjee, N., Shanker, K., Baird, A. H., Cinner, J., Kerr, A. M., et al. (2009). Shelter from the storm? Use and misuse of coastal vegetation bioshields for managing natural disasters. Conservation Letters, 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (2011). Coastal construction manual (4th ed.).Google Scholar
  45. Forgues, É., & Séguin, M.-T. (2011). Les travailleurs d’usines de transformation de produits marins, au centre d’un équilibre systémique. In O. Chouinard, J.-P. Vanderlinden, & J. Baztan (Eds.), Défis de l’approche intégrée dans les zones côtières : la transformation accélérée du littoral dans le contexte des défis environnementaux. Montréal, Quebec: PUQ.Google Scholar
  46. Füssel, H.-M., & Klein, R. J. T. (2006). Climate change vulnerability assessments: An evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change, 75, 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gallopin, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptative capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Germanwatch. (2004). Sea-level rise in Bangladesh and the Netherlands—one phenomenon, many consequences. Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  49. Gesch, D. B. (2009). Analysis of lidar elevation data for improved identification and delineation of lands vulnerable to sea-level rise. Journal of Coastal Research, 53, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Groupe du bassin versant (GBV) de la région de Cap-Pelé. Le projet de conservation des dunes du parc de l’Aboiteau (9 p).Google Scholar
  51. Gunderson, L. H. (1999). Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3, 7.Google Scholar
  52. Haddow, G., & Bullock, J. (2005). Introduction to emergency management (424 p). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  53. Hammill, A., Bizikova, L., Dekens, J., & McCandless, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of climate change vulnerability assessment, lessons from Tunisia and Indonesia (40 p). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ).Google Scholar
  54. Harish, A. (2012, August 2). New law in North Carolina Bans latest scientific predictions of sea-level rise. ABC News.Google Scholar
  55. Heffernan, O. (2012). Adapting to a warmer world: No going back. Nature, 491, 659–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Herbert, I. (2003). Low-lying Britain faces uncertainty over flood insurance. The Independent, 1er janvier.Google Scholar
  57. Hinkel, J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: Towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 21, 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Holling, C. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change. In W. Clark & R. Mund (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Hossain, M. L., & Hossain, M. K. (2009). Climate change, sea level rise and coastal vulnerabilities of Bangladesh with adaptation options (75 p). Bangladesh: Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, University of Chittagong.Google Scholar
  60. Howe, P. D., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U.S. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1488–1500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Huq, S., Rahman, A., Konate, M., Sokona, Y., & Reid, H. (2003). Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCS). International Institute for Environment and Development Climate Change Programme.Google Scholar
  62. Hussain, A. (2008, Janvier 27). Flood insurance blacklist swells. Sunday Times.Google Scholar
  63. Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IIBHS). (n. d.). Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety Research Center. http://disastersafety.org/wp-content/uploads/RSC_overview_IBHS.pdf.
  64. Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN). (2007). Bangladesh: Megaphones save thousands. 23 November.Google Scholar
  65. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC). (2005). Coastal area management. http://ioc.unesco.org/iocweb/coastalmanagement.php.
  66. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1990). Climate change: The IPCC response strategies. Report prepared for Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by Working Group III (330 p).Google Scholar
  67. Intergovernmentary Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1994). IPCC technical guidelines for assessing climate change impacts and adaptation (58 p). University College London, Center for Global Environmental Studies.Google Scholar
  68. Intergovernmentary Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (1997). In R. T. Watson, M. C. Zinyowera & R. H. Moss (Eds.), The regional impacts of climate change: An assessment of vulnerability (517 p). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Intergovernmentary Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). In R. T. Watson & The Core Team (Eds.), Climate change 2001: Synthesis report. A contribution of working groups I, II, III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (398 p). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. International Organization on Migration (IOM). (2007). Migration and the environment. Discussion note, 94th session.Google Scholar
  71. Jacobs, R. E. (2005). Treading deep waters: Substantive law issues in Tuvalu’s threat to sue the United States in the International Court of Justice. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, 14, 103–128.Google Scholar
  72. Jacques, G., & Le Treut, H. (2004). Le changement climatiques (160 p). Paris: Éditions Unesco.Google Scholar
  73. Klein, R. J. T., & Nicholls, R. J. (1999). Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio, 28, 182–187.Google Scholar
  74. Kroeger, T. (2012). Dollars and sense: Economic benefits and impacts from two oyster reef restoration projects in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Arlington: The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
  75. Kuper, R., & Kröpelin, S. (2006). Climate-controlled Holocene occupation of the Sahara: Motor of Africa’s evolution. Science, 313, 803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lemos, M. C., Agrawal, A., Johns, O., Eakin, H., Nelson, D., & Engle, N. (2013). Building adaptive capacity to climate change in less developed countries. In Asrar, Ghassem R., Hurrell, James W. (Eds.), Climate science for serving society (pp. 437–457). Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  77. Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstorf, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1786–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Linham, M. M., & Nicholls, R. J. (2010). Technologies for climate change adaptation—Coastal erosion and flooding. Roskilde, Denmark: UNEP Risø Centre on Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  79. London Assembly, 2002. Flooding in London. A London Assembly Scrutiny Report. Google Scholar
  80. López-Carr, D., & Marter-Kenyon, J. (2015). Human adaptation: Manage climate-induced resettlement. Nature, 517, 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on earth. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Mancebo, F. (2006). Du risque “naturel” à la catastrophe urbaine: Katrina. VertigO, 7. doi: 10.4000/vertigo.2096. http://vertigo.revues.org/2096.
  83. Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’énergie, du développement durable et de la mer (MEEDDM). (2010). La protection de la mer et du littoral et gestion des activités.Google Scholar
  84. Ministère des Pêches et océans du Canada (MPO). (2010). Plan de gestion intégrée des pêches.Google Scholar
  85. Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoE). (2011). Coastal regulation zone notification. In Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part-II, Section 3, Sub-section (ii) of the 6th January, 2011.Google Scholar
  86. Morris, R. (2010). Tuvalu v. ExxonMobil? The coming tide of transnational climate lawsuits. Mother Jones. Google Scholar
  87. Munich Re (2012). Natural and man-made catastrophes in 2012. Knowledge Series, Natural Hazards.Google Scholar
  88. Munich Re (2014). Geo risks research. NatCatSERVICE 2014.Google Scholar
  89. National Adaptation Programme of Action (NAPA) Tuvalu. (2007). Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment, Agriculture and Lands, Department of Environment.Google Scholar
  90. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2011). Managing our coastal zone. http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/tools/czm/.
  91. National Research Counccil (NRC). (2006). Community disaster resilience: A summary of the March 20, 2006, workshop of the disasters roundtable. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  92. Naughton, P., & Pavia, W. (2007, November 9). Tidal surge sweeps past east coast of England—and surfers catch a wave. Times Online.Google Scholar
  93. Nellemann, C., Verma, R., & Hislop, L. (Eds.) (2011). Women at the frontline of climate change: Gender risks and hopes. A rapid response assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal.Google Scholar
  94. Nicholls, R. J., Wong, P. P., Burkett, V. R., Codignotto, J. O., Hay, J. E., McLean, R. F., Ragoonaden, S., & Woodroffe, C. D. (2007). Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 315–356). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  95. Noblet, M. (2013). Sénégal: Adaptation au changement climatique en zone côtière. In O. Chouinard & S. Weissenberger (Eds.), Adaptation aux changements climatiques et à l’augmentation du niveau de la mer en zone côtière – une perspective mondiale. Moncton: UVED, New Brunswick Environmental Trust Fund, Université de Moncton.Google Scholar
  96. Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 141, 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nouveau-Brunswick (NB). (2002). Politique de protection des zones côtières pour le Nouveau-Brunswick. Direction de la planification durable. Ministère de l’environnement et des Gouvernements locaux du Nouveau-Brunswick. Fredericton, NB.Google Scholar
  98. O’Connell, J. (2008). Coastal Dune Protection and Restauration. Marine Extension Bulletin, Woods Hole Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
  99. Orlove, B. (2005). Human adaptation to climate change: a review of three historical cases and some general perspectives. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Paavola, J. (2008). Livelihoods, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in Morogoro, Tanzania. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 642–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Pringle, P. (2011). AdaptME: Adaptation monitoring and evaluation. Oxford: UKCIP, School of Geography and the Environment.Google Scholar
  103. Québec. (2013). Politique de protection des rives, du littoral et des plaines inondables. Loi sur la qualité de l’environnement (chapitre Q-2, a. 2.1).Google Scholar
  104. Raji, O., Del Rio, L., Gracia, F. J., & Benavente, J. (2011). The use of LIDAR data for mapping coastal flooding hazard related tostorms in Cádiz Bay (SW Spain). Journal of Coastal Research, 64, 1881–1885.Google Scholar
  105. Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Wordbook for practitioners, Version 2.0.Google Scholar
  106. Rioux, C., Roussel, D., Eisenberg, A., Kleiser, M., & Lévesque, M.-C. (2008). Évaluation économique des risques associés à l’érosion des zones côtières et aux méthodes d’adaptation dans le golfe du Saint-Laurent: secteurs de Sept-îles, Percé et des Iles-de-la-Madeleine. Gestion des ressources maritimes, Département des sciences de la gestion, Université du Québec à Rimouski. Rapport de recherche remis au Consortium Ouranos et au PIACC de Ressources naturelles Canada, 75 p.Google Scholar
  107. Sahin, O., & Mohamed, S. (2014). Coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise: A spatial-temporal assessment framework. Natural Hazards, 70, 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Schleifstein, M. (2012, January 12). Louisiana coastal restoration 50-year blueprint released. The Times-Picayune.Google Scholar
  109. Schröter, D., Polsky, C., & Patt, A. G. (2005). Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 10, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Schwarz, A., Béné, M.-C., Bennett, G., Boso, D., Hilly, Z., Paul, C., et al. (2011). Vulnerability and resilience of remote rural communities to shocks and global changes: Empirical analysis from Solomon Islands. Global Environnemental Change, 21, 1128–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., & Street, R. (1999). The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change, 45, 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Smit, B., & Pilifosova, O. (2001). Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In J. J. McCarthy, O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken, & K. S. White (Eds.), Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 877–912). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Smit, B., & Wandel, S. (2006). Adaptation, adaptative capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Solutions d’adaptation aux changements climatiques pour l’Atlantique (SACCA). (2012). Adaptation aux changements climatiques: Inondations côtières – Bas-Caraquet.Google Scholar
  116. Spearman, M., & McGray, H. (2011). Making adaptation count: Concepts and options for monitoring and evaluation of climate change adaptation. Eschborn, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit.Google Scholar
  117. Stervinou, V., Mayrand, E., Chouinard, O., & Thiombiano, A. N. (2013). La perception des changements environnementaux: le cas de la collectivité côtière de Shippagan (Nouveau-Brunswick, Canada). VertigO, 13(1). doi:  10.4000/vertigo.13482. http://vertigo.revues.org/13482.
  118. Stiles, S., & Hulst, S. (2013). Homeowners insurance changes in Coastal Virginia—Causes and consequences for shoreline communities. Wetlands Watch.Google Scholar
  119. Swansburg, E., El-Jabi, N., & Caissie, D. (2004). Climate change in New Brunswick (Canada): Statistical downscaling of local temperature, precipitation, and river discharge. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2544, 42 p.Google Scholar
  120. Swiss Re. (2013). Natural and man-made catastrophes in 2012. Sigma Study.Google Scholar
  121. Thames Estuary (TE) 2100. (2012). Managing flood risk through London and the Thames estuary—TE2100 Plan. London, UK: Environment Agency.Google Scholar
  122. Thumerer, T., Jones, A. P., & Brown, D. (2000). A GIS based coastal management system for climate change associated flood risk assessment on the east coast of England. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Turkkan, N., El-Jabi, N., & Caissie, D. (2011). Floods and droughts under different climate change scenarios in New Brunswick. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 2928, xii, 55 p.Google Scholar
  124. Turner, B. L. R. E, I. I., Kasperson, P. A., Matson, J. J., McCarthy, R. W., Corell, L., Christensen, N., et al. (2003). Science and technology for sustainable development special feature: a framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of National Academic Sciences, 100, 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). (1995). Guidelines for integrated management of coastal and marine areas—With special reference to the Mediterranean Basin. In UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 161. Split: PAP/RAC (MAP/UNEP).Google Scholar
  126. United Nations Environmental Programme/United Nations Development Programme (UNEP/UNDP). (2011). Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development planning: A guide for practitioners.Google Scholar
  127. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2005). Climate change, small island developing States. Bonn, Germany: Issued by the Climate Change Secretariat, 28 p.Google Scholar
  128. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC). (2010). Synthesis report on efforts undertaken to monitor and evaluate the implementation of adaptation projects, policies and programmes and the costs and effectiveness of completed projects, policies and programmes, and views on lessons learned, good practices, gaps and needs. Bonn: UNFCCC.Google Scholar
  129. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). (2005). Hyogo framework for 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters.Google Scholar
  130. Webster, T. L., Christian, M., Sangster, C., & Kingston, D. (2005). High-resolution elevation and image data within the bay of fundy coastal zone, Nova Scotia, Canada. In D. Bartllet & J. Smith (Eds.), GIS for Coastal Zone Management (pp. 195–218).Google Scholar
  131. WEDO, UNIFEM. (2010). Gender assessment of policies and practices related to climate change risk management in the Caribbean. Final Report.Google Scholar
  132. World Bank. (n.d.). Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in agriculture and natural resources management projects guidance notes. Climate Change Team, Environment Department.Google Scholar
  133. Yohe, G., & Tol, R. S. J. (2002). Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 12, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut des sciences de l’environnementUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Département de sociologie, Programme de la Maîtrise en études de l’environnementUniversité de Moncton, Campus de MonctonMonctonCanada

Personalised recommendations