Abstract
Facilitated by an external coach, team coaching has been introduced as a method to increase team competency, effectiveness, and learning mainly at the middle manager level (named coachees). However, team coaching also has some pitfalls which will be explored in this chapter. A 13 month team coaching intervention focusing on team safety-related competences, effectiveness, and learning was conducted in three department teams (team X, Y and Z) in a medium-sized Danish company (Company A). However, at the end of the intervention results between the three teams varied. Team Y solved 72 % of the coaching tasks and started an additional 15 %. Six out of seven success criteria for the intervention were fulfilled and the last criteria partly fulfilled. In team X, the equivalent results were 45 % safety tasks completed and 25 % started. Here, two success criteria were fulfilled, four partly fulfilled and one not fulfilled. Due to organizational changes, team Z was excluded from the project half-way through the intervention. Lessons learned and possible solutions: Mutual goals among the team members are identified as important for the success of team coaching. Moreover, organizational changes can interrupt the implementation of team coaching interventions. Clear communication and resolution of differences in opinion are essential for the process and results of team coaching and should be integrated into the theory of team coaching.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aagaard Nielsen, K., & Svensson, L. (Eds.). (2006). Action and interactive research. Beyond practice and theory. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.
Axelson, B. L., & Thylefors I. (2006). Arbejdsgruppers psykolog (The psychology of work groups) (in Danish). Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Beskæftigelsesministeriet (Ministry of Labour in Danish) (2010) Bekendtgørelse Af Lov Om Arbejdsmiljø Nr. 1072 Af September 7, 2010 (Law for Working Environmental Issues Number 1072, September 7, 2010) (in Danish).
Berglas, S. (2002). The very real dangers of executive coaching. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 86–87.
Britton, J. J. (2010). Effective group coaching. Tried and tested tools and resources for optimum group coaching skills. Mississauga: Wiley/John Wiley & Sons Canada, Ltd.
Clutterbuck, D. (2010). Team coaching. In E. Cox, T. Bachkirova, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The complete handbook of coaching (pp. 271–283). London: SAGE.
de Vries, M. F. R. K. (2005). Leadership group coaching in action: The zen of creating high performance teams. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 61–76.
DeJoy, D. M. (2005). Behavior change versus culture change: Divergent approaches to managing workplace safety. Safety Science, 43(2), 105–129.
Hasle, P., Kines, P., & Andersen, L. P. (2009). Small enterprise owners’ accident causation attribution and prevention. Safety Science, 47(1), 9–19.
Kines, P., Andersen, D., Andersen, L. P., Nielsen, K., & Pedersen, L. M. (2013). Improving safety in small enterprises through an integrated safety management intervention. Journal of Safety Research, 44(1), 87–95.
Nielsen, K. J., Pedersen, L. M., Andersen, L., & Kines, P. (2011). Sikkerhedskassen (Safety tool box), (in Danish). Retrieved February 16, 2012, from http://www.amkherning.dk/dk/videnomarbejdsmilj/arbejdsulykker/sikkerhedskassen
Nielsen, K. J., Kines, P., Pedersen, L. M., Andersen, L. P. S., & Andersen, D. R. (2015). A multi-case study of the implementation of an integrated approach to safety in medium-sized enterprises. Safety Science, 71(1), 143–150.
Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., & Walshe, K. (2005). Realist review -a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 10(1), 21–34.
Pedersen, L. M. (Under review). Applying a realistic evaluation model to occupational safety interventions. Safety Science.
Pedersen, L. M., Nielsen, K. J., & Kines, P. (2012). Realistic evaluation as a new way to design and evaluate occupational safety interventions. Safety Science, 50(1), 48–54.
Welman, P., & Bachkirova, T. (2010). The issue of power in the coaching relationship. In S. Palmer & A. McDowall (Eds.), The coaching relationship: Putting people first (pp. 139–158). Hove/New York: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
The project was funded by the Danish Working Environment Research Fund, project 28-2007-09 and involved three other studies which were also based on DeJoy’s theory of integrated safety management (Kines et al. 2013; Nielsen et al. 2015). The methods developed in the study were subsequently adapted into an easy to use ‘Safety toolbox’ (in Danish) and made freely available to consultants and enterprises (Nielsen et al. 2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pedersen, L.M. (2015). Mutual Goals as Essential for the Results of Team Coaching. In: Karanika-Murray, M., Biron, C. (eds) Derailed Organizational Interventions for Stress and Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9867-9_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9866-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9867-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)