Skip to main content

Action and Deontology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Freedom and Enforcement in Action

Part of the book series: Trends in Logic ((TREN,volume 42))

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the deontology of actions. According to the presented approach, actions and not propositions are deontologically loaded. Norms direct actions and define the circumstances in which actions are permitted, prohibited, or mandated. Norms are therefore viewed as deontological rules of conduct. The definitions of permission, prohibition, and obligatoriness of an action are formulated in terms of the relation of transition of an action system. A typology of atomic norms is presented. To each atomic norm a proposition is associated and called the normative proposition corresponding to this norm. A logical system, the basic deontic logic, is defined and an adequate semantics based on action systems is supplied. The basic deontic logic validates the closure principle. (The closure principle states that if an action is not forbidden, it is permitted.) A system which annulls this principle is also presented. In this context the problem of consistency of norms is examined. The problem of justice is discussed. The key role plays here is the notion of a righteous family of norms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The discussion of the meaning of the connective \(\angle \) for compound actions is more intricate. This problem will not be tackled here, though.

  2. 2.

    If \(\beta \) represents the act of ‘killing,’ and \(\alpha \) represents ‘killing in self-defense,’ then according to (4.3.33), in each case if killing is forbidden, then it is also forbidden to kill even if in self-defense. We cannot see any deontic paradox here. This conclusion is justified when \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) are treated as atomic actions (or the resultant relations of composite actions). But if the definition of \(\angle \)  is extended onto compound actions, (4.3.32) and (4.3.33) are no longer true; see Sect. 4.5.

  3. 3.

    One can undermine the justifiability of the axioms (4.3.32) and (4.3.33) for compound actions. If a compound action is forbidden, we can see no reason why each of its ‘parts’ should be forbidden; see Sect. 4.5.

  4. 4.

    The obligatory norm \((\phi , \alpha , !)\) may be also interpreted as the command “\(\phi \), therefore perform \(\alpha \)!”.

  5. 5.

    Infinite runs of states (in both directions) also make sense. Some remarks on infinite runs in situational action systems are presented in Sect. 2.2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janusz Czelakowski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Czelakowski, J. (2015). Action and Deontology. In: Freedom and Enforcement in Action. Trends in Logic, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9855-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics