Abstract
This chapter is concerned with the deontology of actions. According to the presented approach, actions and not propositions are deontologically loaded. Norms direct actions and define the circumstances in which actions are permitted, prohibited, or mandated. Norms are therefore viewed as deontological rules of conduct. The definitions of permission, prohibition, and obligatoriness of an action are formulated in terms of the relation of transition of an action system. A typology of atomic norms is presented. To each atomic norm a proposition is associated and called the normative proposition corresponding to this norm. A logical system, the basic deontic logic, is defined and an adequate semantics based on action systems is supplied. The basic deontic logic validates the closure principle. (The closure principle states that if an action is not forbidden, it is permitted.) A system which annulls this principle is also presented. In this context the problem of consistency of norms is examined. The problem of justice is discussed. The key role plays here is the notion of a righteous family of norms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The discussion of the meaning of the connective \(\angle \) for compound actions is more intricate. This problem will not be tackled here, though.
- 2.
If \(\beta \) represents the act of ‘killing,’ and \(\alpha \) represents ‘killing in self-defense,’ then according to (4.3.33), in each case if killing is forbidden, then it is also forbidden to kill even if in self-defense. We cannot see any deontic paradox here. This conclusion is justified when \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) are treated as atomic actions (or the resultant relations of composite actions). But if the definition of \(\angle \) is extended onto compound actions, (4.3.32) and (4.3.33) are no longer true; see Sect. 4.5.
- 3.
- 4.
The obligatory norm \((\phi , \alpha , !)\) may be also interpreted as the command “\(\phi \), therefore perform \(\alpha \)!”.
- 5.
Infinite runs of states (in both directions) also make sense. Some remarks on infinite runs in situational action systems are presented in Sect. 2.2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Czelakowski, J. (2015). Action and Deontology. In: Freedom and Enforcement in Action. Trends in Logic, vol 42. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9855-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9855-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9854-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9855-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)