Skip to main content

Limited Influence of Sediment Grain Size on Elemental XRF Core Scanner Measurements

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research ((DPER,volume 17))

Abstract

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) scanning of sediment cores allows the rapid acquisition of bulk geochemical data at high resolution. The XRF core scanner data, which are expressed as elemental counts or peak areas, are mainly related to elemental concentrations, but they are also influenced by a series of sediment physical properties that vary with depth, such as bulk density, water content, organic matter content, and grain size. Here, we investigate the influence of grain size on elemental XRF peak areas by comparing ITRAX XRF core scanner measurements to ICP-AES elemental concentration for two sediment cores with variable grain size. Results provide evidence for a limited influence of sediment grain size on XRF peak areas. This influence is negligible for sediment cores with grain-size variations of 10 μm or less. Our data also demonstrate that for cores with large grain-size variations, correcting the peak areas for water content improves the precision of the XRF measurements by a factor of three. This study therefore demonstrates that, for most sediment cores, the precision of data obtained by XRF core scanning is not significantly altered by grain-size variations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bertrand S, Hughen KA, Lamy F, Stuut JBW, Torréjon F, Lange CB (2012a) Precipitation as the main driver of Neoglacial fluctuations of Gualas glacier, Northern Patagonian Icefield. Clim Past 8:519–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand S, Hughen K, Sepúlveda J, Pantoja S (2012b) Geochemistry of surface sediments from the fjords of Northern Chilean Patagonia (44–47°S): spatial variability and implications for paleoclimate reconstructions. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 76(1):125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand S, Hughen KA, Sepúlveda J, Pantoja S (2014) Late Holocene covariability of the southern westerlies and sea surface temperature in northern Chilean Patagonia. Quat Sci Rev 105, 195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Croudace IW, Rindby A, Rothwell RG (2006) ITRAX: description and evaluation of a new multi-function X-ray core scanner. In: Rothwell RG (ed) New techniques in sediment core analysis. Geol Soc Spec Publ 267:51–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuven S, Francus P, Cremer J-F (2007) Protocoles d’utilisation et essais de calibration du scanner de microfluorescence X de type “ITRAX core scanner”. INRS-ETE, Québec, rapport de recherche no 954, p 108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuven S, Francus P, Lamoureux SF (2010) Estimation of grain-size variability with micro X-ray fluorescence in laminated lacustrine sediments, cape bounty, Canadian high arctic. J Paleolimnol 44(3):803–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vivo B, Belkin HE, Lima A (2008) Environmental geochemistry: site characterization, data analysis and case histories. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 429

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser NF, Harrison S, Jansson KN, Anderson K, Cowley A (2011) Global sea-level contribution from the Patagonian icefields since the little ice age maximum. Nat Geosci 4:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Sholkovitz E, Conte M (2007) Application of high-temperature fusion for analysis of major and trace elements in marine sediment trap samples. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 5:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Injuk J, Van Grieken R, Blank A, Eksperiandova L, Buhrke V (2006) Specimen preparation. In: Beckhoff et al (eds) Handbook of practical X-ray fluorescence analysis. Heidelberg, Springer, pp 411–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Kido Y, Koshikawa T, Tada R (2006) Rapid and quantitative major element analysis method for wet fine-grained sediments using an XRF microscanner. Mar Geol 229:209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray R, Miller D, Kryc K (2000) Analysis of major and trace elements in rocks, sediments, and interstitial waters by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). ODP Technical Note 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter TO, van der Gaast S, Koster B, Vaars A, Giele R, de Stigte HC, De Haas H, van Weering TCE (2006) The avaatech XRF core scanner: technical description and applications to NE Atlantic sediments. In: Rothwell RG (ed) New techniques in sediment core analysis, vol 267. Geological Society Special Publication, London, pp 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholkovitz E (1990) Rare-earth elements in marine sediments and geochemical standards. Chem Geol 88(3–4):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syvitski JPM (2007) Principles, methods and applications of particle size analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 388

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjallingii R, Röhl U, Kölling M, Bickert T (2007). Influence of the water content on X-ray fluorescence core scanning measurements in soft marine sediments. Geochem Geophys Geosystems 8(2). doi:10.1029/2006GC001393

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolitschka B, Mingram J, van der Gaast S, Jansen JHF, Naumann R (2001) Sediment logging techniques. In: Last WM, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments, vol 1. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 137–153

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by an EU FP6 Marie Curie Outgoing Fellowship to S.B. Cruise NBP0505 was funded by the US National Science Foundation, Office of Polar Programs grant number NSF/OPP 03-38137 to J. Anderson (Rice University) and J. Smith Wellner (University of Houston). The Cimar-7 Program was supported by the Chilean National Oceanographic Committee (CONA, Grant C7F 01-10 to S. Pantoja). We thank the curators of the Florida State University Antarctic Marine Geology Research Facility (Simon Nielsen and Lindsey Geary) for their assistance with shipping core JPC14 to WHOI. We are grateful to Jess Tierney (WHOI) for her help with the XRF core scanner measurements, and to Jan-Berend Stuut and Inka Meyer (MARUM, Bremen, Germany) for providing access to the Coulter particle size analyzer. S.B. is currently a postdoctoral fellow of the Flemish Research Foundation (FWO, Belgium). Appendix

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Bertrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bertrand, S., Hughen, K., Giosan, L. (2015). Limited Influence of Sediment Grain Size on Elemental XRF Core Scanner Measurements. In: Croudace, I., Rothwell, R. (eds) Micro-XRF Studies of Sediment Cores. Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9849-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics