Abstract
Geochemical evaluation of sediment records traditionally exploits dry mass concentration data; the new generation of scanning XRF devices, however, are generally presented with wet sediment cores. Therefore, conversion of wet core measured XRF data to dry mass concentrations will aid the palaeoenvironmental interpretation, provided the method used is reliable and avoids loss of data quality. Here, using data from a GEOTEK/Olympus DELTA scanning µXRF device (approximately 5 mm resolution), we compare two methods: (1) correction by simple regression, calibrated using dry sediment elemental concentration data measured for a ‘training set’ of subsamples, and (2) a novel technique that corrects for water content estimated using X-ray scattering data obtained during scanning. We show that where sediment water contents are highly variable the regression method fails while water content correction methods can be highly effective. Where water sediment water contents are relatively constant, the elemental regression is as effective and introduces less noise.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boyle JF (2000) Rapid elemental analysis of sediment samples by isotope source XRF. J Paleolimnol 23:213–221
Boyle JF (2001) Inorganic geochemical methods in palaeolimnology. In: Last WM, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments. Volume 2: physical and geochemical methods. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 83–141
Boyle JF, Chiverrell RC, Norton SA, Plater AJ (2013) A leaky model of long-term soil phosphorus dynamics. Glob Biogeochem Cycle 27:516–525
Croudace IW, Rindby A, Rothwell RG (2006) ITRAX: description and evaluation of a new multi-function X-ray core scanner. In: Rothwell RG (ed) New techniques in sediment core analysis, vol 267. Geological Society of London, London, pp 51–63 (Special Publication)
Duvauchelle P, Peix G, Babot D (1999) Effective atomic number in the Rayleigh to Compton scattering ratio. Nucl Instrum Method B 155:221–228
Finkelshtein AL, Brjansky N (2009) Estimating particle size effects in X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Nucl Instrum Method B 267:2437–2439
Hennekam R, de Lange G (2012) X-ray fluorescence core scanning of wet marine sediments: methods to improve quality and reproducibility of high- resolution paleoenvironmental records. Limnol Oceanogr Methods 10:991–1003
Kylander ME, Lind EM, Wastegård S, Löwemark L (2012) Recommendations for using XRF core scanning as a tool in tephrochronology. Holocene 22:371–375
Löwemark L, Chen HF, Yang TN, Kylander M, Yu EF, Hsu YW, Lee TQ, Song SR, Jarvis S (2011) Normalizing XRF-scanner data: a cautionary note on the interpretation of high-resolution records from organic-rich lakes. J Asian Earth Sci 40:1250–1256
Richter TO, van der Gaast S, Koster B, Vaars A, Gieles R, de Stigter HC, de Haas H, van Weering TCE (2006) The Avaatech XRF core scanner: technical description and applications to NE Atlantic sediments. Geol Soc Spec Publ 267:39–50
Shen ZX, Bloemendal J, Mauz B, Chiverrell RC, Dearing JA, Lang A, Liu QS (2008) Holocene environmental reconstruction of sediment-source linkages at Crummock Water, English Lake District, based on magnetic measurements. Holocene 18:129–140
Tertian R (1969) Quantitative chemical analysis with X-ray fluorescence spectrometry—an accurate and general mathematical correction method for interelement effects. Spectrochim Acta B 24:447
Tjallingii R, Röhl U, Kölling M, Bickert T (2007) Influence of the water content on X-ray fluorescence core-scanning measurements in soft marine sediments. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8:1–12
Weltje GJ, Tjallingii R (2008) Calibration of XRF core scanners for quantitative geochemical logging of sediment cores: theory and application. Earth Planet Sci Lett 274:423–438
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boyle, J., Chiverrell, R., Schillereff, D. (2015). Approaches to Water Content Correction and Calibration for µXRF Core Scanning: Comparing X-ray Scattering with Simple Regression of Elemental Concentrations. In: Croudace, I., Rothwell, R. (eds) Micro-XRF Studies of Sediment Cores. Developments in Paleoenvironmental Research, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9849-5_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9849-5_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9848-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9849-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)