Skip to main content

Explanation and Organizing Principles in Systems Biology

  • Chapter
Book cover Explanation in Biology

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 11))

Abstract

While explanation in biology is a well-established topic in philosophy of science, since the rise of new mechanistic approaches little has been said about explanation in Systems Biology. In this contribution, we analyze whether contemporary conceptualizations of explanation fit with the scientific practice of systems approaches in molecular and cell biology. We discuss how current views on mechanistic explanation can be applied to the use of mathematical models in system biology. To this end it is important to distinguish different kinds of models: While some of them merely save the phenomena, not being explanatory, others make mechanistic claims and can be embedded in the framework of mechanistic explanations. We will make a conceptual distinction and discuss the roles different kinds of models have in Systems Biology. In our view, the current mechanistic framework is not sufficient to capture all types of explanations occurring in Systems Biology. A multicellular system is not merely defined by its structural components, including genes, proteins and their interconnections, but has a functional organization, that is the system’s behavior, which emerges from its structural organization. Such emergent properties cannot be understood or explained by merely describing the mechanisms of the underlying molecular and cellular processes. We argue that organizing principles in Systems Biology provides a way of explaining such high-level system properties. With the help of a case study we show that organizing principles explain system-properties complementary to mechanistic explanations. They cannot replace them but they also cannot be reduced to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alon, U., Surette, M. G., Barkai, N., & Leibler, S. (1999). Robustness in bacterial chemotaxis. Nature, 397, 168–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, A. (2015). Mathematical explanation in biology. In P.-A. Braillard & C. Malaterre (Eds.), Explanation in biology. An enquiry into the diversity of explanatory patterns in the life sciences (pp. 229–247). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkai, N., & Leibler, S. (1997). Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature, 387, 913–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. (2011). Mechanism and biological explanation. Philosophy of Science, 78, 533–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2005). Explanation: A mechanistic alternative. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and the Biomedical Sciences, 36, 421–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, J., & Woodward, J. (1988). Saving the phenomena. The Philosophical Review, 97, 303–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J. M., & Doyle, J. (2002). Complexity and robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 2538–2545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N., & Le Poidevin, R. (1991). Fables and models. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 65, 55–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. (2006). When mechanistic models explain. Synthese, 153, 355–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. C. (2000). ‘How does it work’ versus ‘what are the laws?’: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In F. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and cognition (pp. 117–145). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and scientific understanding. Journal of Philosophy, 71, 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glennan, S. (2002). Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, J. (2010). Biological systems theory. Science, 328, 581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Issad, T., & Malaterre, C. (2015). Are dynamic mechanistic explanations still mechanistic? In P.-A. Braillard & C. Malaterre (Eds.), Explanation in biology. An enquiry into the diversity of explanatory patterns in the life sciences (pp. 265–292). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitano, H. (2004). Biological robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 826–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In P. Kitcher & W. Salmon (Eds.), Scientific explanation (pp. 410–505). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic, M. D., Sreenath, S. N., & Keene, J. D. (2004). Searching for organizing principle: Understanding in systems biology. Systems Biology, 1, 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (1999). Models as mediating instruments. In M. Morgan & M. Morrison (Eds.), Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social science (pp. 10–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Novác, B., & Tyson, J. J. (2008). Design principles of biochemical oscillators. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 9, 981–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwob, E., & Nasmyth, K. (1993). CLB5 and CLB6, a new pair of B cyclins involved in DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes and Development, 7, 1160–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, G., & Feinberg, M. (2011). Design principles for robust biochemical reaction networks: What works, what cannot work, and what might almost work. Mathematical Biosciences, 231(2011), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinar, G., Alon, U., & Feinberg, M. (2009). Sensitivity and robustness in chemical reaction networks. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 69, 977–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelling, J., Sauer, W., Szallasi, Z., Doyle, F. J., & Doyle, J. (2004). Robustness of cellular functions. Cell, 118, 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, M. (2007). Who is a modeler? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 58, 207–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolkenhauer, O., et al. (2009). Advancing systems biology for medical applications. IET Systems Biology, 3, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Breidenmoser .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Breidenmoser, T., Wolkenhauer, O. (2015). Explanation and Organizing Principles in Systems Biology. In: Explanation in Biology. History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9822-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics