Skip to main content

Fundamentals of Classical Probability and Quantum Probability Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantum Adaptivity in Biology: From Genetics to Cognition

Abstract

In this chapter we present briefly the basic notions of classical and quantum theories of probability and information. This chapter is especially important for biologists, psychologists, experts in cognition, and sociologists who were not trained in quantum theory (but even classical theory is presented in a simple manner). We start with the presentation of the standard measure-theoretic formulation of the modern classical probability theory (Kolmogorov, Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Springer, Berlin [1]). Then we turn to fundamentals of quantum formalism, including theory of open quantum systems and its generalizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We remark that, for a discrete random variable, the integral coincides with the sum for the mathematical expectation, see (2.5). And a discrete random variable is integrable if its mathematical expectation is well defined. In general any integrable random variable can be approximated by integrable discrete random variables and its integral is defined as the limit of the integrals for the approximating sequence.

  2. 2.

    Here bar denotes complex conjugation ; for \(z=x+iy,\) \(\bar{z}=x-iy\).

  3. 3.

    See Sect. 1.3 for a further discussion.

  4. 4.

    In particular, by the orthodox Copenhagen interpretation \(\psi \) is interpreted as the physical state of a system. As a consequence, its collapse is a physical event.

  5. 5.

    The set of all the eigenvectors is a linear subspace of \(\fancyscript{H}\).

  6. 6.

    Even the majority of physicists have never read the von Neumann’s book [3] and they have no idea that von Neumann distinguished degenerate and non-degenerate cases. We are aware that this distinction may play an important role in biology.

  7. 7.

    Decoherence is a complicated interpretational issue of quantum mechanics. Some (but not all) researchers treat decoherence as a form of measurement.

  8. 8.

    In quantum information theory this equation is often referred as Lindblad equation.

  9. 9.

    We treat the notion of decision very generally: from decisions made by people to “cell’s decisions”, e.g., to undergo epimutation.

  10. 10.

    In the coordinate form tensor products of vectors and matrices are also known under the name Kronecker product . This structure is widely used in various computational algorithms including computational biology.

  11. 11.

    “What is beyond this symbolism?”—this is a separate question (Sect. 9.2; see also [19]). In a series of papers [6, 20, 21, 23, 24] quantum systems were represented by classical random fields. In this approach elements of the tensor product can be visualized via the functional representation.

  12. 12.

    We remark that information features of entanglement can be modeled (mimic) by using coarse graining procedure for classical stochastic processes, even for classical Brownian motion [19]. In the latter paper the entanglement is exhibited at the level of observables corresponding to coarse graining.

  13. 13.

    In computability theory, a decision problem, which has two possible answers, “yes” or “no”, for an input of question is studied well, and its complexity is classified into several complexity classes. NP (Nondeterministic Polynomial time) problem is a decision problem, whose solution is not given in polynomial time on a non-deternimistic Turing machine, and NP-complete problem is a NP problem reduced in polynomial time from any other NP problems. Whether NP-complete problem can be reduced to Polynomial problem is one of the millennium prize problems, it has been discussed for thirty yeas.

References

  1. Kolmogoroff, A.N.: Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Springer, Berlin (1933); English translation: Kolmogorov, A.N.: Foundations of Theory of Probability. Chelsea Publishing Company, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boole, G.: An Investigation of the Laws of Thought. Dover Edition, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Von Neuman, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khrennikov, A.: Contextual Approach to Quantum Formalism. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khrennikov, A.: Detection model based on representation of quantum particles by classical random fields: Born’s rule and beyond. Found. Phys. 39, 997–1022 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ingarden, R.S., Kossakowski, A., Ohya, M.: Information Dynamics and Open Systems: Classical and Quantum Approach. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Ohya, M., Volovich, I.V.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Information and Computation and Its Applications to Nano- and Bio-systems. Springer, Berlin-New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Asano, M., Ohya, M., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum-like model for decision making process in two players game. Found. Phys. 41(3), 538–548 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Yamato, I.: Quantum-like interference effect in gene expression: glucose-lactose destructive interference. Syst. Synth. Biol. 5, 59–68 (2011)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum probability explanation for violation of rational decision theory. Proc. R. Soc. B 276(1165), 2171–2178 (2009)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J. R.: A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction. Top. Cogn. Sci. (2013), to be published

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zorn, C.H., Smith, Ch.: Pseudo-classical nonseparability and mass politics in two-party systems. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.) Quantum Interaction-3. Lectures Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7052, pp. 83–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Khrennikova, P., Khrennikov, A., Haven, E.: The quantum-like description of the dynamics of party governance in the US political system (2012). arXiv:1206.2888 [physics.gen-ph]

  15. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev. 47(10), 777–780 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs, C.A.: Quantum mechanics as quantum information (and only a little more). In: Khrennikov, A. (ed.) Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations. Series Mathematical Modeling 2, pp. 463–543. Växjö University Press, Växjö (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Caves, C.M., Fuchs, Ch.A., Schack, R.: Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022305 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fuchs, Ch.A., Schack, R.: A quantum-Bayesian route to quantum-state space. Found. Phys. 41, 345–356 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Allahverdyan, A.E., Balian, R., Nieuwenhuizen, Th.M.: The quantum measurement process in an exactly solvable model. In: Foundations of Probability and Physics-3. American Institute of Physics. Series Conference Proceedings, vol. 750, pp. 16–24. Melville (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khrennikov, A.: Description of composite quantum systems by means of classical random fields. Found. Phys. 40, 1051–1064 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Watanabe, N.: Classical signal model for quantum channels. J. Russ. Laser Res. 31, 462–468 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Khrennikov, A.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance. Springer, Heidelberg-Berlin-New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Khrennikov, A.: Prequantum classical statistical field theory: Schrödinger dynamics of entangled systems as a classical stochastic process. Found. Phys. 41, 317–329 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Watanabe, N.: Quantum probability from classical signal theory. Int. J. Quantum Inf. 9, 281–292 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ohya, M.: Complexities and their applications to characterization of chaos. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37, 495–505 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ohya, M.: Some aspects of quantum information theory and their applications to irreversible processes. Rep. Math. Phys. 27, 19–47 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ohya, M., Volovich, I.V.: New quantum algorithm for studying NP-complete problems. Rep. Math. Phys. 52, 25–33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ohya, M.: Adaptive dynamics and its applications to chaos and NPC problem. In: QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis. Quantum Bio-Informatics, vol. 21, pp. 181–216 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masanari Asano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asano, M., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Yamato, I. (2015). Fundamentals of Classical Probability and Quantum Probability Theory. In: Quantum Adaptivity in Biology: From Genetics to Cognition. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9819-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics