Skip to main content

Grassland Productivity Simulation: Integrating Remote Sensing and an Ecosystem Process Model

  • Chapter
  • 1117 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry ((SPRINGERREMO))

Abstract

The heterogeneous nature of semi-arid grasslands in Canada creates significant challenges in monitoring grassland conditions, especially in light of increasing human activities and rapid environmental changes. It is thus imperative to develop a spatially-explicit tool to monitor and predict grassland productivity and to examine its responses to land-use and environmental change processes. In response to this need, we use a spatial BIOME-BGC model to estimate spatially distributed net primary productivity (NPP) for a mixed semi-arid grassland in Canada. Given the importance of the foliar C:N ratio in modelling terrestrial biochemical cycles and the ability of remote sensing in deriving spatially distributed data, a C:N ratio map is first produced from MODIS data which is then used to drive the spatial BIOME-BGC model. The simulated NPP driven by the fixed foliar C: N (i.e., C:N = 24.0) has an average of 112.53 g C m−2 years−1, while simulated NPP driven by MODIS-derived spatial foliar C:N has an average of 107.36 g C m−2 years−1. The latter better reflects the actual NPP on the ground which is 98.29 g C m−2 years−1. The results demonstrate that spatial foliar C:N can produce a more accurate simulation of grassland biogeochemical cycles thus improving NPP simulation accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams B, White A, Lenton TM (2004) An analysis of some diverse approaches to modeling terrestrial net primary productivity. Ecol Model 177:353–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar Massada A, Carmel Y (2008) Incorporating output variance in local sensitivity analysis for stochastic models. Ecol Model 213:463–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford JB, Lauenroth WK, Burke IC (2005) The impact of cropping on primary production in the U.S. Great Plains. Ecology 86(7): 1863-1872

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman BAM (1992) Linking physical remote sensing models with crop growth simulation models, applied for sugar beet. Int J Remote Sens 13:2565–2581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayrol P, Kergoat L, Moulin S, Dedieu G, Chehbouni A (2000) Calibrating a coupled SVAT-vegetation growth model with remotely sensed reflectance and surface temperature – a case study for the HAPEX-Sahel grassland sites. J Appl Meteorol 39:2452–2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clevers JGPW, van Leeuwen HJC (1996) Combined use of optical and microwave remote sensing data for crop growth monitoring. Remote Sens Environ 56:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WB, Goward SN (2004) Landsat’s role in ecological applications of remote sensing. BioScience 54:535–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer W, Kicklighter DW, Bondeau A, Moore B, Churkina C, Nemry B, Ruimy A, Schloss AL (1999) Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results. Glob Chang Biol 5:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curll MJ, Wilkins RJ, Snaydon RW, Shanmugalingam VS (1985a) The effects of stocking rate and nitrogen fertiliser on a perennial ryegrass-white clover sward: 1. Sward and sheep performance. Grass Forage Sci 40:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curll MJ, Wilkins RJ, Snaydon RW, Shanmugalingam VS (1985b) The effects of stocking rate and nitrogen fertilizer on a perennial ryegrass-white clover sward: 2. Subsequent sward and sheep performance. Grass Forage Sci 40:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran H, van den Berg E, Reich P (1993) Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:192–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fothergill M, Davies DA, Morgan CT (2000) Sheep grazing and white clover. A rest is best? In: Rook AJ, Penning PD (eds) Grazing management. Occasional Symposium No. 34. Harrogate, 29 Feb–2 Mar 2000. The British Grassland Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerif M, Duke CL (2000) Adjustment procedures of a crop model to the site specific characteristics of soil and crop using remote sensing data assimilation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 81:57–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen PM, Schjoerring JK (2003) Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sens Environ 86:542–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasenauer H, Petritsch R, Zhao M, Boisvenue C, Running SW (2012) Reconciling satellite with ground data to estimate forest productivity at national scales. For Ecol Manage 276:196–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y (2008) Modeling grassland productivity through remote sensing products. Ph.D. thesis, University of Saskatchewan

    Google Scholar 

  • He Y (2014) The effect of precipitation on vegetation cover over three landscape units in a protected semi-arid grassland: temporal dynamics and suitable climatic index. Journal of Arid Environments 109:74–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Johnson J, Sallaberry C, Storlie C (2006) Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:1175–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws JA, Newton E (1992) The grazing management of sheep on grass white clover permanent pasture. Ir J Agric Food Res 31:143–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth HFH (1978) Patterns of primary productivity in the biosphere. Hutchinson Ross, Stroudsberg, p 342

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Chen JM, Cihlar J, Park W (1997) A process-based boreal ecosystems productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs. Remote Sens Environ 62:158–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas SJ (1988) Use of remotely-sensed information in agricultural crop growth models. Ecol Model 41:247–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makler-Pick V, Gal G, Gorfine M, Hipsey MR, Carmel Y (2011) Sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models: a new approach. Environ Model Softw 26:124–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell SW, Csillag F (2001) Assessing the stability and uncertainty of predicted vegetation growth under climatic variability: northern mixed grass prairie, Ecol Model, 139(2-3): 101–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojima DS, Parton WJ, Coughenor MB, Scurlock JMO, Kircherner TB, Kittel TGF, Hall DO, Schimel DS, Moya EG, Gilmanov TG, Seastedt TR, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario JI, Long SP, Menaut JC, Sala OE, Scholes RJ, Veen JA (1996) Impact of climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide changes on grasslands of the world. In: Hall DO, Breymeyer AI, Melillo JM, Argen GI (eds) Global change: effects on coniferous forests and grasslands. Wiley, London, pp 271–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr RJ, Parsons AJ, Penning PD, Treacher TT (1990) Sward composition, animal performance and the potential of grass/white clover swards continuously stocked with sheep. Grass Forage Sci 45:325–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton W, Scurlock J, Ojima D (1993) Observations and modelling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7:785–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Coughenor MB, Scurlock JMO, Ojima DS, Gilmanov TG, Kircherner TB, Menaut JC, Seastedt TR, Moya EG, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario JI, Hall DO (1996) Global grassland ecosystem modeling: development and test of ecosystem models for grassland system. In: Hall DO, Breymeyer AI, Melillo JM, Argen GI (eds) Global change: effects on coniferous forests and grasslands. Wiley, London, pp 229–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Psomas A, Kneubühler M, Huber S, Itten K, Zimmermann NE (2008) Coupling imaging spectroscopy and ecosystem process modelling – the importance of spatially distributed foliar biochemical concentration estimates for modelling NPP of grassland habitats. In: IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS 2008), IEEE Boston (USA), CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranson KJ, Sun G, Knox RG, Levine ER, Weishampel JF, Fifer ST (2001) Northern forest ecosystem dynamics using coupled models and remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 75:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Running SW, Hunt ER (1993) Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, BIOME-BGC and an application for global-scale models. In: Ehleringer JC (ed) Field scaling physiological processes: leaf to globe. Academic, San Diego, pp 141–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Campolongo F (2000) Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Stat Sci 15:377–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S, Parsons AJ (1996a) Analysis of the coexistence mechanisms for grasses and legumes in grazing systems. J Ecol 84:799–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinning S, Parsons AJ (1996b) A spatially explicit population model of stoloniferous N-fixing legumes in mixed pastures with grass. J Ecol 84:815–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song CH, Woodcock EC (2003) A regional forest ecosystem carbon budget model: impacts of forest age structure and landuse history. Ecol Model 164:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PE, Law BE, Gholz HL, Clark KL, Falge E, Ellsworth DS, Goldstein AH, Monson RK, Hollinger D, Paw UJC, Sparks JP (2002) Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needle leaf forests. Agric For Meteorol 113:185–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusilova K, Churkina G (2008) The terrestrial ecosystem model GBIOME-BGCv1. Tech Rep Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie 14:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner DP, Ollinger SV, Kimball JS (2004) Integrating remote sensing and ecosystem process models for landscape to regional scale analysis of the carbon cycle. BioScience 54:573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss M, Troufleau D, Baret F, Chauki H, Prevot L, Olioso A, Bruguier N, Brisson N (2001) Coupling canopy functioning and radiative transfer models for remote sensing data assimilation. Agr Forest Meteorol 108:113–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MA, Thornton PE, Running SW, Nemani RR (2000) Parameterization and sensitivity analysis of the BIOME-BGC terrestrial ecosystem model: net primary production controls. Earth Interact 4(3):1–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by ISTPCanada C4507 to Dr. Xulin Guo and NSERC to Dr. Yuhong He. Grateful thanks to Kristina Trusilova for Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, Germany for generously sharing the codes for the terrestrial ecosystem model GBIME-BGCv1.0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuhong He .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

He, Y., Ma, Z., Guo, X. (2015). Grassland Productivity Simulation: Integrating Remote Sensing and an Ecosystem Process Model. In: Li, J., Yang, X. (eds) Monitoring and Modeling of Global Changes: A Geomatics Perspective. Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9813-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics