Skip to main content

The Naturalness of the Naturalistic Fallacy and the Ethics of Nanotechnology

  • Chapter
Book cover The Role of Technology in Science: Philosophical Perspectives

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 18))

  • 1217 Accesses

Abstract

In the first part of this paper, I clear the ground from frequent misconceptions of the relationship between fact and value by examining some uses of the adjective “natural” in ethical controversies. Such uses bear evidence to our “natural” tendency to regard nature (considered in a descriptive sense, as the complex of physical and biological regularities) as the source of ethical norms. I then try to account for the origins of this tendency by offering three related explanations, the most important of which is evolutionistic: if any behaviour that favours our equilibrium with the environment is potentially adaptive, nothing can be more effective for this goal than developing an attitude toward the natural world that considers it as a dispenser of sacred norms that must be invariably respected. By referring to the Aristotelian notion of human flourishing illustrated in the first part of the paper, in the second I discuss as a case study some ethical problems raised by mini-chips implantable in our bodies. I conclude by defending their potential beneficial effects of such new technological instruments.

Research for this paper has been supported by the Spanish MINECO grant FFI2011-29834-C03-03. I thank Karim Bschir and Matteo Morganti for comments on a previous version of this manuscript. This paper develops some arguments contained in Dorato (2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Today many more questions are being discussed, but here I refer just to these two traditional issues.

  2. 2.

    The political, economical and social importance of the problem of the relation between pure and applied research depends obviously on the fact that many governments, in periods of economic crisis, tend to cut budgets for research programs that have no immediate applications and are regarded as “pure”.

  3. 3.

    Consider that quantum mechanics is, on its turn, at the basis of most of today’s technology.

  4. 4.

    See among others Damasio (1994, 1999), LeDoux (1998) and Gigerenzer (2008).

  5. 5.

    This is my translation of the 29th article of the Italian Constitution.

  6. 6.

    “But in my opinion those who framed the laws are the weaker folk, the majority. And accordingly they frame the laws for themselves and their own advantage, and so too with their approval and censure, and to prevent the stronger who are able to overreach them from gaining the advantage over them, they frighten them by saying that to overreach others is shameful and evil, and injustice consists in seeking the advantage over others. For they are satisfied, I suppose, if being inferior they enjoy equality of status. That is the reason why seeking an advantage over the many is by convention said to be wrong and shameful, and they call it injustice. But in my view nature herself makes it plain that it is right for the better to have the advantage over the worse, the more able over the less. And both among all animals and in entire states and races of mankind it is plain that this is the case – that right is recognized to be the sovereignty and advantage of the stronger over the weaker” (Plato, Gorgias 482e).

  7. 7.

    Think of all the examples of cooperation in the animal world described by de Waal (1996). For a defence of our altruistic nature, see also Sober and Wilson (1998).

  8. 8.

    Philosophers have referred to a virtue-centered morality (MacIntyre 1984), or to the neurophysiological basis of human flourishing (Thagard 2011).

  9. 9.

    I agree that they are commoner in person-in-the-street’s arguments, but this is grist to my mill, because it shows their naturalness in the sense of this section.

  10. 10.

    For a brilliant exception to such a neglect, see Daston (2002, p. 374): “I wish to explore how nature could ever have been endowed with moral authority and why that authority still exerts such a powerful, if covert, pull upon our modern sensibilities, despite innumerable critiques and cautions against conflating “is” and “ought,” against “naturalizing” judgments that are really social and political, and against anthropomorphizing “Nature,” designated with a capital N and often with a feminine pronoun.” See also Daston (2004) in Daston and Vidal (2004).

References

  • Bellone, E. (1980). A world on paper: Studies on the second scientific revolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J. (1962). Fictions (Eng. Trans.). New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2010). Supersizing the mind. Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Bíró, S., Koós, O., & Brockbank, M. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. (2002). The morality of the natural order. The power of Medea. The Tanner lectures (pp. 373–411). http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/volume24/daston_2002.pdf

  • Daston, L. (2004). Attention and the values of nature in the enlightenment. In L. Daston & F. Vidal (Eds.) (2004) (pp.100–126).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., & Vidal, F. (2004). The moral authority of nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorato, M. (2004). Epistemic and non-epistemic values in science. In P. Machamer & G. Wolters (Eds.), Science, values and objectivity (pp. 53–77). Pittsburgh/Konstanz: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorato, M. (2005). The software of the universe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorato, M. (2012). The natural ambiguity of the notion of “natural”, and how to overcome it. Epistemologia, 35, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (1929). Iesous basileus. Heidelberg: Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R. (1946). The royal art of astrology. London: H. Joseph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G.-J., & van de Poel, I. (2010) Philosophy of technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2010 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/technology/

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Gut feelings. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo, G. (2008), Impreparati dinanzi al “simbionte”. http://www.swif.uniba.it/lei/rassegna/021119h.htm

  • Luria, A. (1969). The mind of a mnemonist. London: Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. (1896). Populär-wissenschaftliche Vorlesungen. Leipzig: Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A. (1988). Inward bound. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact-value distinction. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodotà, S. (2004). Tra chip e sensori arriva il post-umano. La Repubblica, 6.12.2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. (1970). Philosophy, technology and the arts in the early modern era. New York: Harper and Row. (Eng. Trans. of I philosophe e le machine. 1962, Milano, Feltrinelli).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907/1981). The methods of ethics (7th ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Onto others. The evolution and psychology of unselfish behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (2011). The brain and the meaning of life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mauro Dorato .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dorato, M. (2015). The Naturalness of the Naturalistic Fallacy and the Ethics of Nanotechnology. In: Hansson, S. (eds) The Role of Technology in Science: Philosophical Perspectives. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 18. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9762-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics